during Benghazi hearings.


http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/25/emails...i-hearing/

It isn't bias when you are on the right side of history.

Well...it is CNN.

Like most people, I keep forgetting that CNN is still broadcasting.

Fair and Balanced, the clintoon news network.

Rough couple weeks for this broad, hope her open advocacy was worth it.

Wonder if she gets fired?

I'm sorry...where's the part about the reporter coordinating with Hillary? I didn't see that in the article.

Even the biased Tucker Carlson rag properly framed the story as her "aide" doing the coordination.

She is shrewd and She will do or say anything to get Her way.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/23/okeefe...ees-video/

Also Check out another story from that web page about an undercover reporter talking with Huma Abedin about Hillary wanting the Syrians in the country. They Even interviewed some Syrians whom hinted They would vote for Her if They could get into the country.

(11-25-2015 02:13 PM)CardFan1 Wrote:  She is shrewd and She will do or say anything to get Her way.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/23/okeefe...ees-video/

Also Check out another story from that web page about an undercover reporter talking with Huma Abedin about Hillary wanting the Syrians in the country. They Even interviewed some Syrians whom hinted They would vote for Her if They could get into the country.

Pretty telling how up to speed those Syrians are on American politics.

(11-25-2015 02:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm sorry...where's the part about the reporter coordinating with Hillary? I didn't see that in the article.

Even the biased Tucker Carlson rag properly framed the story as her "aide" doing the coordination.

HIllary isn't a person. She is a "cause"; she is an "idea"; she is a "movement"; in many senses, she is a "team."

Therefore saying "coordinate with Hillary" is appropriate and applicable in this context.

(11-25-2015 02:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm sorry...where's the part about the reporter coordinating with Hillary? I didn't see that in the article.

Even the biased Tucker Carlson rag properly framed the story as her "aide" doing the coordination.

Just damn

no one is ever responsible for anything...ever

(11-25-2015 02:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm sorry...where's the part about the reporter coordinating with Hillary? I didn't see that in the article.
Even the biased Tucker Carlson rag properly framed the story as her "aide" doing the coordination.

So everything is just the result of rogue aides? Because if that's not the case then the distinction you are making is irrelevant.

On the other hand, if it is the case, do we really want anyone in the White House with such bad judgement about the people she trusts?

That water Tom's toting has got to be getting heavy.

Why would anybody be concerned about a candidate who is getting 1% in the polls.

(11-25-2015 11:21 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Why would anybody be concerned about a candidate who is getting 1% in the polls.

w/o reading any of the above, all I could conjure from your response and the thread title??? "was it anal?"

(11-25-2015 11:21 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Why would anybody be concerned about a candidate who is getting 1% in the polls.

Yeah, you'd have to be pretty damn thin-skinned and paranoid to do something like that.

(11-25-2015 09:35 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-25-2015 02:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm sorry...where's the part about the reporter coordinating with Hillary? I didn't see that in the article.
Even the biased Tucker Carlson rag properly framed the story as her "aide" doing the coordination.

So everything is just the result of rogue aides? Because if that's not the case then the distinction you are making is irrelevant.

On the other hand, if it is the case, do we really want anyone in the White House with such bad judgement about the people she trusts?

I'm really tired of having anti-Harry Trumans in the White House. The buck never stops there.

I'm guessing most people who are really fond of Obama and Hillary never had employees. Obama is our employee. Nobody is perfect, but you want employees you can trust and who take responsibility for their mistakes. Taking ownership of your mistakes is the first step in solving them and preventing recurrence.

(11-26-2015 09:36 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-25-2015 09:35 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-25-2015 02:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm sorry...where's the part about the reporter coordinating with Hillary? I didn't see that in the article.
Even the biased Tucker Carlson rag properly framed the story as her "aide" doing the coordination.

So everything is just the result of rogue aides? Because if that's not the case then the distinction you are making is irrelevant.

On the other hand, if it is the case, do we really want anyone in the White House with such bad judgement about the people she trusts?

I'm really tired of having anti-Harry Trumans in the White House. The buck never stops there.

I'm guessing most people who are really fond of Obama and Hillary never had employees. Obama is our employee. Nobody is perfect, but you want employees you can trust and who take responsibility for their mistakes. Taking ownership of your mistakes is the first step in solving them and preventing recurrence.

They've never been in a position of real leadership either. Real leaders take responsibility when they people they are supposed to be leading screw up. When I was in charge of my engine company my Battalion Chief called me on the carpet when one of my guys screwed up because as a leader I was responsible for their actions.

(11-25-2015 02:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm sorry...where's the part about the reporter coordinating with Hillary? I didn't see that in the article.

Even the biased Tucker Carlson rag properly framed the story as her "aide" doing the coordination.

Can we assume that you were one of the guys who blamed Bush for everything?

(11-26-2015 02:03 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  

(11-25-2015 02:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm sorry...where's the part about the reporter coordinating with Hillary? I didn't see that in the article.

Even the biased Tucker Carlson rag properly framed the story as her "aide" doing the coordination.

Can we assume that you were one of the guys who blamedis blaming Bush for everything?

why yes he is.