(11-03-2015 03:22 PM)perimeterpost Wrote:  

(11-03-2015 12:10 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-02-2015 10:41 PM)perimeterpost Wrote:  So the AAC guy looks at 10 conferences and makes a top "7" list so he can passive-aggressively list MW at the bottom.

lol, pathetic.

Don't be an idiot. As someone else pointed out, MWC isn't even 7th. He was complimenting the MWC as one of the top 7. They haven't shown it on the field this year. They are just barely ahead of the Sun Belt and behind the MAC and CUSA.

you're the idiot if you think its rational to look at a group of 10 things and make a top 7 list. you're the idiot if you think a UConn fan was trying to compliment the Mountain West. Don't be an idiot.

The MAC basically doesn't exist.

(11-03-2015 02:52 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(11-03-2015 11:17 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  How is the AAC equal or better than the ACC when 5 schools (Tulsa, Tulane, SMU, UCF & UConn) couldn't win a game in the ACC? The top of the AAC have been great this year but the bottom is just awful. Those 5 teams are 4-19 in conference & 11-31 overall. The top of the ACC is better & the bottom is as well.

The ACC is 3-8 against the other P5, and 3-4 vs the AAC, so 6-12 overall.

The AAC is 4-8 against the other P5, and 4-3 vs the ACC, so 8-11 overall.

The ACC has been really bad this year. It's hard to argue they are better than the AAC.

The AAC is good this year & I'm not saying there is huge gap between them but the top & bottom of the ACC is better. The bottom of the AAC weighs them down a lot.

(11-03-2015 04:02 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  

(11-03-2015 02:52 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(11-03-2015 11:17 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  How is the AAC equal or better than the ACC when 5 schools (Tulsa, Tulane, SMU, UCF & UConn) couldn't win a game in the ACC? The top of the AAC have been great this year but the bottom is just awful. Those 5 teams are 4-19 in conference & 11-31 overall. The top of the ACC is better & the bottom is as well.

The ACC is 3-8 against the other P5, and 3-4 vs the AAC, so 6-12 overall.

The AAC is 4-8 against the other P5, and 4-3 vs the ACC, so 8-11 overall.

The ACC has been really bad this year. It's hard to argue they are better than the AAC.

The AAC is good this year & I'm not saying there is huge gap between them but the top & bottom of the ACC is better. The bottom of the AAC weighs them down a lot.

No question, AAC fans focus on the top 3 teams, that are good, and forget the bottom 3, who are among the 3 worst teams in FBS.

For example, looking at the Massey Composite, the average ACC ranking is 51.5, the average AAC ranking is 62.

Lop off each conference's bottom 3, and the ACC is 41.7, the AAC is 40.4, actually better than the ACC.