(10-22-2015 09:45 AM)thehappyhuskie Wrote:  

(10-22-2015 09:26 AM)Dog Fan Wrote:  Larry Brink. End 'o subject.

Larry Brink now, or Larry Brink heyday?

Now, of course.

(10-22-2015 09:26 AM)Dog Fan Wrote:  Larry Brink. End 'o subject.

+1000

Rahsaan Melvin on the opposite side of Lurry. Especially the way Logan has played this year

Also wouldn't mind seeing Hollis Thomas anchoring the D line


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It would be interesting having Stacey Robinson run this offense.

J-Mac or Birdman.
ACRB is doing enough at RB. Receiver spot is a little light, especially since Canada is all but forgotten out there.

Chandler Harnish

(10-22-2015 12:27 PM)dpgohuskies Wrote:  Chandler Harnish

Finally, a Chandler Harnish. While I really did get caught up in the Jordan Lynch thing and I think being a Heisman finalist was the single best personal accomplishment in the past 25-30 years, I really think that if their careers were flopped (Lynch, then Harnish) we would have had back to back undefeated seasons, back to back BCS appearances, and a better chance at winning those games.

NOT A SINGLE bit of this is to discredit Jordan---flat out, Chandler was better.

(10-22-2015 12:17 PM)pjfleck82 Wrote:  J-Mac or Birdman.
ACRB is doing enough at RB. Receiver spot is a little light, especially since Canada is all but forgotten out there.

But, I think Hare has proven it doesn't matter who the WR is as long as the O-line gives him time to throw (or if it isn't raining). That's why I went with an offensive lineman.

Here's a new question. Who wins a game between the 2015 Huskies + Jordan Lynch vs. the 2015 Huskies + Larry English? My money is on the Englishes, no disrespect to Lynch. Remember we're choosing who would make the 2015 Huskies the most effective, not who we would pick first if forming teams from scratch. We already have a good QB who may be a better passer than Lynch. Lynch was a great runner but we already have a good running game, the carries would just move from the backs to Lynch. On defense English would make a good defense insanely disruptive. Have at it gents.

(10-22-2015 01:36 PM)NIU1981 Wrote:  Here's a new question. Who wins a game between the 2015 Huskies + Jordan Lynch vs. the 2015 Huskies + Larry English? My money is on the Englishes, no disrespect to Lynch. Remember we're choosing who would make the 2015 Huskies the most effective, not who we would pick first if forming teams from scratch. We already have a good QB who may be a better passer than Lynch. Lynch was a great runner but we already have a good running game, the carries would just move from the backs to Lynch. On defense English would make a good defense insanely disruptive. Have at it gents.

can they use mini-Ditkas? "Da Huskies"

(10-22-2015 01:36 PM)NIU1981 Wrote:  Here's a new question. Who wins a game between the 2015 Huskies + Jordan Lynch vs. the 2015 Huskies + Larry English? My money is on the Englishes, no disrespect to Lynch. Remember we're choosing who would make the 2015 Huskies the most effective, not who we would pick first if forming teams from scratch. We already have a good QB who may be a better passer than Lynch. Lynch was a great runner but we already have a good running game, the carries would just move from the backs to Lynch. On defense English would make a good defense insanely disruptive. Have at it gents.

I'm taking Lynch. 4 WRs (Golladay, Turner on one side, Canada, Tommy on the other). Either empty backfield with 1 TE or 0 TEs wih ACRB standing in front of Lynch. Just run QB power with bubbles and deep balls built in all game. The occasional jet sweep. Good luck stopping that.

Lynch made the offensive line better. Put defenses in number disadvantages. With the exception of the weird Ball State game, the defense has been solid even without English.

You realize Lincoln Howard would be blocking Larry English right?

(10-22-2015 02:00 PM)NIU1981 Wrote:  You realize Lincoln Howard would be blocking Larry English right?

I am aware of that, yes. I also remember how much NIU struggled to block Bosa.

I'll still take Lynch.

(10-22-2015 12:56 PM)Milwaukee Pilot Wrote:  

(10-22-2015 12:27 PM)dpgohuskies Wrote:  Chandler Harnish

Finally, a Chandler Harnish. While I really did get caught up in the Jordan Lynch thing and I think being a Heisman finalist was the single best personal accomplishment in the past 25-30 years, I really think that if their careers were flopped (Lynch, then Harnish) we would have had back to back undefeated seasons, back to back BCS appearances, and a better chance at winning those games.

NOT A SINGLE bit of this is to discredit Jordan---flat out, Chandler was better.

Yes.

Pro measurables = Harnish

Winning games = Lynch

Really as simple as that.

Diem

(10-22-2015 03:42 PM)Kansacity88 Wrote:  Diem

+1....need someone NFL athletic and nasty to change temperament / attitude.

I might make a case for Azar. We have good position players but out kicking game needs help

Dave Doeren

(10-22-2015 08:45 PM)HuskieJoe Wrote:  Dave Doeren

Lol...kudos on the out of the box thinking!