Drew 1,155M viewers. Another impressive showing topping last years numbers.

http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/sh...-2015.html

2014 Friday ESPN2 AAC games: UCF/USF had 447K, Tulsa/UCF had 735K, UC/Tulane had 648K, and USF/UC had 576K viewers.

Much better channel placement and numbers for the Tigers compared to last year.

(10-05-2015 04:15 PM)gulfcoastgal Wrote:  Drew 1,155M viewers. Another impressive showing topping last years numbers.

http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/sh...-2015.html

2014 Friday ESPN2 AAC games: UCF/USF had 447K, Tulsa/UCF had 735K, UC/Tulane had 648K, and USF/UC had 576K viewers.

Much better channel placement and numbers for the Tigers compared to last year.

'Murika's Team!

Wow, that is really good.

(10-05-2015 05:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Wow, that is really good.

Really good since we won. Woulda been rough if we had lost

(10-05-2015 06:00 PM)holyterror Wrote:  

(10-05-2015 05:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Wow, that is really good.

Really good since we won. Woulda been rough if we had lost

Would have been great if we had performed better. A win but not our best performance. Think of the national attention if we had laid 40+ on them.

(10-05-2015 09:11 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(10-05-2015 06:00 PM)holyterror Wrote:  

(10-05-2015 05:02 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Wow, that is really good.

Really good since we won. Woulda been rough if we had lost

Would have been great if we had performed better. A win but not our best performance. Think of the national attention if we had laid 40+ on them.

That was the best defense we've played all season

I'm tracking year over year ratings and so far Memphis has "outperformed." A LOT has to do with channel placement, but even then UM numbers have so far exceeded prior year bests. The AAC has to be happy with Memphis thus far.

I'm curious as to the local/regional numbers. Maybe the CA/Daily/Flyer/Helmsman will look into it. (get the #)

(10-06-2015 12:36 PM)gulfcoastgal Wrote:  I'm tracking year over year ratings and so far Memphis has "outperformed." A LOT has to do with channel placement, but even then UM numbers have so far exceeded prior year bests. The AAC has to be happy with Memphis thus far.

I'm curious as to the local/regional numbers. Maybe the CA/Daily/Flyer/Helmsman will look into it. (get the #)

Seems like the kind of thing the Big 12 would take note of, as well.

(10-06-2015 01:09 PM)holyterror Wrote:  

(10-06-2015 12:36 PM)gulfcoastgal Wrote:  I'm tracking year over year ratings and so far Memphis has "outperformed." A LOT has to do with channel placement, but even then UM numbers have so far exceeded prior year bests. The AAC has to be happy with Memphis thus far.

I'm curious as to the local/regional numbers. Maybe the CA/Daily/Flyer/Helmsman will look into it. (get the #)

Seems like the kind of thing the Big 12 would take note of, as well.

Quick, someone get the pamphlets together!

(10-06-2015 01:11 PM)tiger2000 Wrote:  

(10-06-2015 01:09 PM)holyterror Wrote:  

(10-06-2015 12:36 PM)gulfcoastgal Wrote:  I'm tracking year over year ratings and so far Memphis has "outperformed." A LOT has to do with channel placement, but even then UM numbers have so far exceeded prior year bests. The AAC has to be happy with Memphis thus far.

I'm curious as to the local/regional numbers. Maybe the CA/Daily/Flyer/Helmsman will look into it. (get the #)

Seems like the kind of thing the Big 12 would take note of, as well.

Quick, someone get the pamphlets together!

Don't need pamphlets; once they see the airport, it's a done deal.

(10-06-2015 01:09 PM)holyterror Wrote:  

(10-06-2015 12:36 PM)gulfcoastgal Wrote:  I'm tracking year over year ratings and so far Memphis has "outperformed." A LOT has to do with channel placement, but even then UM numbers have so far exceeded prior year bests. The AAC has to be happy with Memphis thus far.

I'm curious as to the local/regional numbers. Maybe the CA/Daily/Flyer/Helmsman will look into it. (get the #)

Seems like the kind of thing the Big 12 would take note of, as well.

Yep --- fan support was one of the question marks I'd think. TV numbers another. More of this can only help.

Yep, a negative talking point on Memphis is not carrying the local market...let's see the numbers. The FB NYT says Memphis has it, but prove it.

AFAIK, UofM is doing good...better than last year. We'll see...would love for local press to publish local #.