RE: Game Week: Akron
I may be in the minority here, but if this team wants to use this season as a stepping stone to building a contender in 2016 and 2017 I truly believe that Roback must stay the starting quarterback when Bell returns. Neither one of these guys is a complete quarterback yet. Bell is injury prone, lacks pocket presence, his footballs tend to float a little and his footwork is non-existent. However, he is a great athlete and his ability to make something out of nothing is a huge incentive. That being said; Roback has shown flashes, his arm strength is top notch, his understanding of the offense, ability to read defenses, and move on to second and third reads is better than Bell's. Roback is a good athlete, can scramble when necessary but he isn't Bell. Roback throws off his back foot way to often, and into coverage at the worst possible times. But, and this is a huge unknown, if the coaches finally decide to stay with Roback, can you imagine where we will be next year with all of these guys returning. Vann, Tuttle, Browing, Daughtery, Bantham. The defense will have POC back, Maclean looks like he might be good on the other defensive end along with Harris. Figueroa and Brown should continue to improve at nose tackle, our secondary held their own last night. I think the rest of this season is going to be rough and hopefully we eek out a couple more wins, but I'm optimistic that next year will be the year we see a winning record. But we can't have the quarterback merry-go-round. Bell will never make it through a Division 1 football season as a starting quarterback. Like I said, just my opinion but if we are laying a foundation for the future we need to have a quarterback that will lead this team, and while neither guy is perfect I believe Roback has the greater up-side.
|