"Abortions account for over 86% of Planned Parenthood’s revenues, according to President Cecile Richards, who makes over $520,000 annually."

Those abortions sure are expensive if only counts for 3% of their services

http://www.infowars.com/planned-parentho...abortions/

(09-30-2015 09:32 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  "Abortions account for over 86% of Planned Parenthood’s revenues, according to President Cecile Richards, who makes over $520,000 annually."

Those abortions sure are expensive if only counts for 3% of their services

http://www.infowars.com/planned-parentho...abortions/

The President actually made Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah look stupid.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress...op-n435606

Info wars?

I'm surprised they didn't say Planned Parenthood made 186% of their revenue from harvesting body parts from late term abortions done on 15 year olds without a parent's or a judges consent.

Even if something posted on infowars was for once correct, so what? Abortion is legal. PP does abortions. No federal funding can be used to perform abortions. Your argument is with SCOTUS.

Quote:“Let’s talk about Planned Parenthood revenue for abortions,” Lummins told Richards. “If you look at the 2013 statistics that you report, abortions from revenue would have been over 86% of your non-government revenue.”

For accuracy.

The government doesn't pay for abortions. Women with money don't go to Planned Parenthood for other services, meaning virtually all of their other services are paid for with government revenue. Imagine that.

(09-30-2015 10:07 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  The President actually made Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah look stupid.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress...op-n435606

Care to be more specific?

(09-30-2015 10:17 AM)Niner National Wrote:  

Quote:“Let’s talk about Planned Parenthood revenue for abortions,” Lummins told Richards. “If you look at the 2013 statistics that you report, abortions from revenue would have been over 86% of your non-government revenue.”

For accuracy.

The government doesn't pay for abortions. Women with money don't go to Planned Parenthood for other services, meaning virtually all of their other services are paid for with government revenue. Imagine that.

Also, this is a quote from Lummins interpreting something in the PP documentation. He likely didn't understand what he read or just lied about it.

Did you see that ass Chaffetz trying to pass off a misleading chart with no x/y axis as being from the PP reports, when in fact it was from a pro-life group and had the name of that group plastered right on his chart?



By any means necessary. It's sickening the levels of lying these Republicans stoop to.

(09-30-2015 10:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:07 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  The President actually made Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah look stupid.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress...op-n435606

Care to be more specific?

Don't you have a job you should be doing?

Yea, you don't want to defend Chaffetz or Jim Jordan.

If I'm planned parenthood, the next time there's a hearing, I'd ask MSNBC to break into to cover it live.

(09-30-2015 10:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:07 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  The President actually made Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah look stupid.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress...op-n435606

Care to be more specific?

Don't you have a job you should be doing?

Trying to see where my check has your signature on it... nope, cant find RedDickTom on it.

(09-30-2015 10:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:17 AM)Niner National Wrote:  

Quote:“Let’s talk about Planned Parenthood revenue for abortions,” Lummins told Richards. “If you look at the 2013 statistics that you report, abortions from revenue would have been over 86% of your non-government revenue.”

For accuracy.

The government doesn't pay for abortions. Women with money don't go to Planned Parenthood for other services, meaning virtually all of their other services are paid for with government revenue. Imagine that.

Also, this is a quote from Lummins interpreting something in the PP documentation. He likely didn't understand what he read or just lied about it.

Did you see that ass Chaffetz trying to pass off a misleading chart with no x/y axis as being from the PP reports, when in fact it was from a pro-life group and had the name of that group plastered right on his chart?



By any means necessary. It's sickening the levels of lying these Republicans stoop to.

Does it not seem odd that Chaffetz implies that a decrease in "cancer screening and prevention services" is a bad thing? Yet that's exactly what defunding PP would achieve, because that's what the Government money goes towards.

(09-30-2015 10:27 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:07 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  The President actually made Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah look stupid.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress...op-n435606

Care to be more specific?

Don't you have a job you should be doing?

Trying to see where my check has your signature on it... nope, cant find RedDickTom on it.

Relax Francis. You told me yesterday that you didn't have time to respond to my question because you don't spend all day on here and that you have a job. I was merely joking with you because of that.

And was the insult really necessary? Are we still in high school?

(09-30-2015 10:32 AM)ODUgradstudent Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:17 AM)Niner National Wrote:  

Quote:“Let’s talk about Planned Parenthood revenue for abortions,” Lummins told Richards. “If you look at the 2013 statistics that you report, abortions from revenue would have been over 86% of your non-government revenue.”

For accuracy.

The government doesn't pay for abortions. Women with money don't go to Planned Parenthood for other services, meaning virtually all of their other services are paid for with government revenue. Imagine that.

Also, this is a quote from Lummins interpreting something in the PP documentation. He likely didn't understand what he read or just lied about it.

Did you see that ass Chaffetz trying to pass off a misleading chart with no x/y axis as being from the PP reports, when in fact it was from a pro-life group and had the name of that group plastered right on his chart?



By any means necessary. It's sickening the levels of lying these Republicans stoop to.

Does it not seem odd that Chaffetz implies that a decrease in "cancer screening and prevention services" is a bad thing? Yet that's exactly what defunding PP would achieve, because that's what the Government money goes towards.

Chaffetz was an absolute disgrace. He hardly even gave Richards the courtesy to look at her when she was testifying. And then the flippant response when grilling her about her pay. The fool spent ten minutes+ with his opening remarks. Then Cummings got 10 minutes. Then Jordan got 5 minutes. Then another Democrat got 5 minutes. Then Chaffetz finally asks her a question 30 minutes plus into the show. As soon as she started to answer he interrupts and cuts her off telling here that he didn't have time for her detailed response. The hearing was 5 hours long.

(09-30-2015 10:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:17 AM)Niner National Wrote:  

Quote:“Let’s talk about Planned Parenthood revenue for abortions,” Lummins told Richards. “If you look at the 2013 statistics that you report, abortions from revenue would have been over 86% of your non-government revenue.”

For accuracy.

The government doesn't pay for abortions. Women with money don't go to Planned Parenthood for other services, meaning virtually all of their other services are paid for with government revenue. Imagine that.

Also, this is a quote from Lummins interpreting something in the PP documentation. He likely didn't understand what he read or just lied about it.

Did you see that ass Chaffetz trying to pass off a misleading chart with no x/y axis as being from the PP reports, when in fact it was from a pro-life group and had the name of that group plastered right on his chart?



By any means necessary. It's sickening the levels of lying these Republicans stoop to.

The video is in the link I posted. He makes a complete arse of himself and ends up with egg all over his face. She made him look stupid.

(09-30-2015 10:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:27 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:07 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  The President actually made Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah look stupid.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress...op-n435606

Care to be more specific?

Don't you have a job you should be doing?

Trying to see where my check has your signature on it... nope, cant find RedDickTom on it.

Relax Francis. You told me yesterday that you didn't have time to respond to my question because you don't spend all day on here and that you have a job. I was merely joking with you because of that.

And was the insult really necessary? Are we still in high school?

(09-30-2015 10:40 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:17 AM)Niner National Wrote:  

Quote:“Let’s talk about Planned Parenthood revenue for abortions,” Lummins told Richards. “If you look at the 2013 statistics that you report, abortions from revenue would have been over 86% of your non-government revenue.”

For accuracy.

The government doesn't pay for abortions. Women with money don't go to Planned Parenthood for other services, meaning virtually all of their other services are paid for with government revenue. Imagine that.

Also, this is a quote from Lummins interpreting something in the PP documentation. He likely didn't understand what he read or just lied about it.

Did you see that ass Chaffetz trying to pass off a misleading chart with no x/y axis as being from the PP reports, when in fact it was from a pro-life group and had the name of that group plastered right on his chart?



By any means necessary. It's sickening the levels of lying these Republicans stoop to.

The video is in the link I posted. He makes a complete arse of himself and ends up with egg all over his face. She made him look stupid.

Care to be more specific? I find it hard to believe that you got all of that from Chaffetz just saying "No, I wont". They didnt even show what the president of pp was saying.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/...ERSION.pdf

Unless they're doctoring their books, that's not possible.
30% of their revenues come from donations and another 41% come from Govt Health Services Grants and Reimbursements (which exclude abortions by law). So that's 70% that is out of the running from the start.

Or another way: 328K abortions generated $985M in revenue? They don't charge $3K per abortion.

I'm all for having a debate about PP funding, but let's stick to credible data, OK?

(09-30-2015 10:04 AM)gsu95 Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 09:32 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  "Abortions account for over 86% of Planned Parenthood’s revenues, according to President Cecile Richards, who makes over $520,000 annually."

Those abortions sure are expensive if only counts for 3% of their services

http://www.infowars.com/planned-parentho...abortions/

Yep.

Sounds just like your typical democrat party voter.

(09-30-2015 12:02 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 10:04 AM)gsu95 Wrote:  

(09-30-2015 09:32 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  "Abortions account for over 86% of Planned Parenthood’s revenues, according to President Cecile Richards, who makes over $520,000 annually."

Those abortions sure are expensive if only counts for 3% of their services

http://www.infowars.com/planned-parentho...abortions/

Yep.

Sounds just like your typical democrat party voter.