Haven't heard much...did Obama manage to silence all the media after he took over Texas?

Jade Helm Begins: The Complete "Texas Takeover" Guide

Why has commenting been disabled?

That's always the best part.

Alex Jones...

I didn't think he was really still on the air.

(09-11-2015 02:00 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Alex Jones...

I didn't think he was really still on the air.

I have a guilty pleasure........I really like listening to George Noori and Coast to Coast AM

(09-11-2015 02:09 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(09-11-2015 02:00 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Alex Jones...

I didn't think he was really still on the air.

I have a guilty pleasure........I really like listening to George Noori and Coast to Coast AM

I get that.

I listen to "The Blaze" sometimes while I am on the shower. Glenn Beck cried this morning.

(09-11-2015 02:09 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(09-11-2015 02:00 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Alex Jones...

I didn't think he was really still on the air.

I have a guilty pleasure........I really like listening to George Noori and Coast to Coast AM

I love this show. Is this show still on? Here locally, it's been replaced by something called

"Ground Zero".

Alex Jones makes the smallest exercise into some major fiasco. MEH

I like Ground Zero but George Noory is just not interesting. The best thing about Coast to Coast was the show on Saturday nights hosted by John B. Wells. His show dominated the ratings and blew Noory off the map. Wells was fired and now he has his own show.
Caravan to Midnight!

There's lots of gullible people out there. What else can you say?

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(09-11-2015 11:08 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Why has commenting been disabled?

That's always the best part.

As ZH does with every article, it is archived after a certain period (I believe 10 days), which disables additional comments.

ZH's coverage was obviously tongue-in-cheek.

I guess you probably didn't read this part:

Quote: So although a "Texas takeover" and/or martial law are probably not in the cards here, the government's response to concerned (if misinformed) citizens leaves much to be desired and we’ll leave it to readers to decide what that says about government accountability and transparency.

(09-11-2015 08:46 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  There's lots of gullible people out there. What else can you say?

I chalk it up to a failure of the military's PAO to inform people beyond gov't officials what Jade Helm entailed. Most people can't bothered with reading CONUS military training plans and are thus surprised when the black helos do show up overhead and inevitably give into tin foil hat conspiracies.

What I also find stunning is that people believe that Obama would be the President to actually institute martial law and that the military would actually carry out such orders.

To follow up in that, why then does BHO want to Federalize the Police?

(09-14-2015 08:21 AM)vandiver49 Wrote:  

(09-11-2015 08:46 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  There's lots of gullible people out there. What else can you say?

I chalk it up to a failure of the military's PAO to inform people beyond gov't officials what Jade Helm entailed. Most people can't bothered with reading CONUS military training plans and are thus surprised when the black helos do show up overhead and inevitably give into tin foil hat conspiracies.

What I also find stunning is that people believe that Obama would be the President to actually institute martial law and that the military would actually carry out such orders.

This. If there is a military coup in this nation, it isn't coming from the left. I don't think it'd ever come from the right, either, but between the two, it's not at all ambiguous which ideology the military supports to a greater extent.

(09-14-2015 09:15 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  To follow up in that, why then does BHO want to Federalize the Police?

Because Obama is someone who believes that the federal gov't can implement national standards for police and overcome the variances that exist at the state and local level.

(09-14-2015 01:04 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 09:15 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  To follow up in that, why then does BHO want to Federalize the Police?

Because Obama is someone who believes that the federal gov't can implement national standards police and overcome the variances that exist at the state and local level.

More Centralized Govt and stripping any State Authority. More tyranny,.. It's crystal clear.

(09-14-2015 01:10 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 01:04 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 09:15 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  To follow up in that, why then does BHO want to Federalize the Police?

Because Obama is someone who believes that the federal gov't can implement national standards police and overcome the variances that exist at the state and local level.

More Centralized Govt and stripping any State Authority. More tyranny,.. It's crystal clear.

Why did you ask the question if you're going to wholly ignore his answer?

(09-14-2015 01:10 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 01:04 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 09:15 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  To follow up in that, why then does BHO want to Federalize the Police?

Because Obama is someone who believes that the federal gov't can implement national standards police and overcome the variances that exist at the state and local level.

More Centralized Govt and stripping any State Authority. More tyranny,.. It's crystal clear.

I was a suggestion he voiced, it obviously didn't get implemented nor does any sitting POTUS have the financial and political capital to make such a dream reality. What can come from the federal level are standardizes guidelines. But it wouldn't be codified as law, just something written up under DHS for effective tactics.

(09-14-2015 02:28 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  It was a suggestion he voiced, it obviously didn't get implemented nor does any sitting POTUS have the financial and political capital to make such a dream reality. What can come from the federal level are standardizes guidelines. But it wouldn't be codified as law, just something written up under DHS for effective tactics.

One more thing that we don't need DHS to be doing.

(09-14-2015 08:40 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 02:28 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  It was a suggestion he voiced, it obviously didn't get implemented nor does any sitting POTUS have the financial and political capital to make such a dream reality. What can come from the federal level are standardizes guidelines. But it wouldn't be codified as law, just something written up under DHS for effective tactics.

One more thing that we don't need DHS to be doing.

I don't like the idea of the DHS running this stuff, but I do think federal standardization is needed when it comes to law enforcement. It's crazy to realize that it's hard to find good data on the number of people killed by police, for instance. That's just an easy example to point to, but it does point to a wider problem in general.

Obama will not leave office when his time comes. You just watch. The best way of doing that is to implement martial law and that's just the beginning. It'll happen just before his time ends ala N.Y.C.'s mayor during 9/11.