Also have to consider distance learning as well.

UC may have dropped in the rankings but they just got a dedicated article with pictures in the New York Times Magazine.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/magazi....html?_r=0

(09-10-2015 08:43 PM)InspectorHound Wrote:  UC may have dropped in the rankings but they just got a dedicated article with pictures in the New York Times Magazine.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/magazi....html?_r=0

I'd prefer a higher USNWR rating to that Times article, which isn't exactly flattering.

(09-10-2015 06:34 PM)qsilvr2531 Wrote:  

(09-10-2015 05:52 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:  

(09-10-2015 08:49 AM)subflea Wrote:  He just explained why Ono's statement could be correct while the number of applicants used for the USNWR data could have gone down or stayed the same.

That's what I get for responding in the middle of interruptions. I find it hard to believe that Blue Ash and Clermont are the ones experiencing all the growth.

I do to but if President Ono is including transfer and graduate applications in his statements that could explain the difference as well.

Ono just twittered (again) about the dramatic increase in applications (up something like 19%, I think) and campus visits (up 33%!). Been seeing these kind of twitters for the past several years.

Campus visits are typically incoming freshman, presumably interested in the main campus. I guess when information is presented in that manner, it should be safe to assume that those campus visits are translating into increased applications to the main campus.

http://www.bestcollegereviews.org/featur...n-centers/

We rate #1 in this article on student recreation centers.