As I said before, I foresaw that Ohio State would be foolish to not use a quarterback rotation between Barrett and Jones. People like to stick with concept that they understand. For most folks, the past has shown us that quarterback rotations just don't work. They don't allow quarterbacks to be in a rhythm or to have the confidence that they can make a mistake and not get removed from the game.
Considering the success that both quarterbacks have had, I think both should feel very comfortable in their position.
What I would do? I would have them each play a half and I wouldn't make it the same half every game. That will force teams every week to have to game plan for both quarterbacks which puts them at a disadvantage to the Buckeyes in preparation. They wont even know before kick off what quarterback they will be facing in the first half so they cant lean towards preparing for one quarterback while then using half time to supplement the preparation for the other quarterback.
This will give Ohio State a considerable advantage all year long above and beyond the talent advantage they already have.
What talent advantage is that? Well everyone is already saying they have three Heisman candidates on the team. Well I am saying that they have four. If they run this system then they very well may have two QB candidates, a receiver candidate with Braxton Miller and a running back candidate with Elliot. Elliot is even seen by many to be the frontrunner currently. What if Bosa is dominant after his return? Five possible candidates?
This team may go down as the most dominant football team in the history of football at the college level. That isn't me being a homer, that is simply me speaking about what everyone is speaking about.
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...s-involved
Quote:Meyer later said the message to both quarterbacks will be to "get ready because I'd like to see both guys involved."