Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
2016 Massey Percentages
Author Message
baker-'13 Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 430
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 9
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #1
2016 Massey Percentages
As with last year, Ken Massey has predicted results for our schedule this year.

I took the liberty of throwing these percentages into a trusty Excel spreadsheet (based on one JOwl built for this last year) to see what happened. It's attached for anyone who wants to play along.

Quick summary of probabilities of given win totals:
0 wins: 0.0000% (taking this out to ten decimals still yields zero's)
1 win: 0.0002%
2: 0.0061%
3: 0.0994%
4: 0.8350%
5: 4.0858%
6: 12.3686%
7: 23.7070%
8: 28.5493%
9: 20.6881%
10: 8.1672%
11: 1.4196%
12: 0.0738%

There are two scenarios tied for the most likely individual set of outcomes: 9-3 (losses to Texas, Baylor, and LaTech), and 10-2 (flip the LaTech result).

I plan on keeping this updated as the season goes along. If nothing else, it's something to amuse myself with as time goes on.

ETA: Attaching did not work. Instead, find the sheet in a (viewable-only) Google spreadsheet here.
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2015 07:54 PM by baker-'13.)
08-10-2015 11:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


owl95 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,137
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 28
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #2
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
In the 10-2 scenario, I assume we would be the conference champs?
08-11-2015 01:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cr11owl Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,717
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 29
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #3
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 01:53 AM)owl95 Wrote:  In the 10-2 scenario, I assume we would be the conference champs?

It would at least get us to the conference championship game where we would host Marshall or WKU.
08-11-2015 05:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OWLmanz Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 954
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation: 1
I Root For: OWLS & TEXANS
Location: River Oaks
Post: #4
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
01-wingedeagle OK I am "just" an "academ," but how can 9 and 10 wins be the most likely scenarios, since the data table appears to show 8 wins as the highest probability outcome, with 7 wins as the second highest probability????? 04-jawdrop Makes no sense..... 03-banghead

Of course, we learned even in Econ and Finance, that you can interpret statistics any way that you want...........
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2015 07:48 AM by OWLmanz.)
08-11-2015 07:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
baker-'13 Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 430
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 9
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #5
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 07:46 AM)OWLmanz Wrote:  01-wingedeagle OK I am "just" an "academ," but how can 9 and 10 wins be the most likely scenarios, since the data table appears to show 8 wins as the highest probability outcome, with 7 wins as the second highest probability????? 04-jawdrop Makes no sense..... 03-banghead

Of course, we learned even in Econ and Finance, that you can interpret statistics any way that you want...........

"Most likely scenario" = most specific exact combination of things. You get higher probabilities for 7 and 8 wins because there are more different combinations that lead to 7 or 8 wins than there are 9 or 10 wins, even if those individual combinations have a lower probability that the most likely 9- and 10-win combinations.
08-11-2015 08:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,632
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #6
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
What I note is that we are favored in 9 of 12 contests, and an underdog in only 2.

I love this thread. It will be interesting to see how we turn out against the projections. Thanks, 13
08-11-2015 08:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


OWLmanz Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 954
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation: 1
I Root For: OWLS & TEXANS
Location: River Oaks
Post: #7
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
WHAT?? I hear what you're saying, but I find it hard to believe.............. I'm probably too "simplisticly rational" I guess! 03-nutkick Also, if we are truly favored in 9 games, why isn't that the highest probability result???????????? 03-banghead

(08-11-2015 08:40 AM)baker-13 Wrote:  
(08-11-2015 07:46 AM)OWLmanz Wrote:  01-wingedeagle OK I am "just" an "academ," but how can 9 and 10 wins be the most likely scenarios, since the data table appears to show 8 wins as the highest probability outcome, with 7 wins as the second highest probability????? 04-jawdrop Makes no sense..... 03-banghead

Of course, we learned even in Econ and Finance, that you can interpret statistics any way that you want...........

"Most likely scenario" = most specific exact combination of things. You get higher probabilities for 7 and 8 wins because there are more different combinations that lead to 7 or 8 wins than there are 9 or 10 wins, even if those individual combinations have a lower probability that the most likely 9- and 10-win combinations.
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2015 09:30 AM by OWLmanz.)
08-11-2015 09:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
loki_the_bubba Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,713
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 704
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #8
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-10-2015 11:52 PM)baker-13 Wrote:  As with last year, Ken Massey has predicted results for our schedule this year.

I took the liberty of throwing these percentages into a trusty Excel spreadsheet (based on one JOwl built for this last year) to see what happened. It's attached for anyone who wants to play along.

Quick summary of probabilities of given win totals:
0 wins: 0.0000% (taking this out to ten decimals still yields zero's)
1 win: 0.0002%
2: 0.0061%
3: 0.0994%
4: 0.8350%
5: 4.0858%
6: 12.3686%
7: 23.7070%
8: 28.5493%
9: 20.6881%
10: 8.1672%
11: 1.4196%
12: 0.0738%

There are two scenarios tied for the most likely individual set of outcomes: 9-3 (losses to Texas, Baylor, and LaTech), and 10-2 (flip the LaTech result).

I plan on keeping this updated as the season goes along. If nothing else, it's something to amuse myself with as time goes on.

95% chance we reach bowl eligibility.
08-11-2015 10:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gsloth Offline
perpetually tired
*

Posts: 6,654
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Rice&underdogs
Location: Central VA

Donators
Post: #9
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 08:55 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  What I note is that we are favored in 9 of 12 contests, and an underdog in only 2.

I love this thread. It will be interesting to see how we turn out against the projections. Thanks, 13
emphasis added

With exactly zero actual results to support a real comparative calculation. Sure, it feels right, but until games are actually played, hard to say how we compare - which of our opponents surprise on the positive side (hopefully not many), and how many fail to live up to expectations (which is what Texas and Baylor will be doing when (if?) they lose to Rice).
08-11-2015 10:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,632
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #10
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 10:40 AM)gsloth Wrote:  
(08-11-2015 08:55 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  What I note is that we are favored in 9 of 12 contests, and an underdog in only 2.

I love this thread. It will be interesting to see how we turn out against the projections. Thanks, 13
emphasis added

With exactly zero actual results to support a real comparative calculation. Sure, it feels right, but until games are actually played, hard to say how we compare - which of our opponents surprise on the positive side (hopefully not many), and how many fail to live up to expectations (which is what Texas and Baylor will be doing when (if?) they lose to Rice).

Exactly why I am glad to see that 13 will keep up with this as the season progresses. I presume the percentages will change as we and our opponents have actual results to input, but for now, before the games start, being projected a favorite in 9 games and a tossup in another I think is a good start. I wonder how many games we were preseason favorites in in each of the last five years?

Massey has us at 21% against Texas, about the same as my seat-of-the-pants estimate at 25%. Of more interest to me is that they predict an 11 point margin, 28-17. Does this satisfy the requirement that some here have of keeping it respectable and showing we belong on the same field with them?? it doesn't do it for me. I want to win.
08-11-2015 11:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
owl95 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,137
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 28
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #11
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
OO I want to win as well. 1 in 5 chance to win is not bad. It depends on how the Notre Dame game goes. If UT gets beat up, that could be good for us, sometimes losing badly is contagious. I feel like that is part of what happened vs ODU last year. I think might tune into the UT-Notre Dame game a bit to see how they look.
08-11-2015 11:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,632
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #12
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 11:22 AM)owl95 Wrote:  OO I want to win as well. 1 in 5 chance to win is not bad. It depends on how the Notre Dame game goes. If UT gets beat up, that could be good for us, sometimes losing badly is contagious. I feel like that is part of what happened vs ODU last year. I think might tune into the UT-Notre Dame game a bit to see how they look.

Yeah. I was referring to the people who will be satisfied with a good showing. That would be better than nothing, but as a goal it stinks.
08-11-2015 11:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hambone10 Offline
Hooter
*

Posts: 40,333
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 1290
I Root For: My Kids
Location: Right Down th Middle

New Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #13
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 09:28 AM)OWLmanz Wrote:  WHAT?? I hear what you're saying, but I find it hard to believe.............. I'm probably too "simplisticly rational" I guess! 03-nutkick Also, if we are truly favored in 9 games, why isn't that the highest probability result???????????? 03-banghead

overly-simplistic response (what else would you expect from a dumb jock) but while we are favored in 9, there is a 'margin of error' in all of them.

I think the stats probably say that 7 of the 9 our 'favor' is outside the margin of error... on the other side, perhaps only one of the three is inside it. That would make sense if you think about rankings... 7 teams likely worse than 80... 2 teams probably in the top 25.... 2 teams probably ranked between 60 and 80... and then us and one other ranked between 60 and maybe 40.

We're expected to win 7 (all the teams ranked 80 or higher). Likely to win at least one and likely two more (the 60-80's)... MIGHT win a third (the one with us between 40 and 60)... unlikely to win the other two (top 25).

We'd have to significantly under perform our 'expected average performance' to win fewer than 7, and significantly out-perform our 'expected average performance' to win more than 10.... of course, assuming THEY all play to their pre-season expectations as well
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2015 11:46 AM by Hambone10.)
08-11-2015 11:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OldOwl Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,315
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: -12
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #14
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
I hope Texas beats Notre Dame and then they come in over confident to play us. BAM -Upset :)
(08-11-2015 11:44 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  
(08-11-2015 09:28 AM)OWLmanz Wrote:  WHAT?? I hear what you're saying, but I find it hard to believe.............. I'm probably too "simplisticly rational" I guess! 03-nutkick Also, if we are truly favored in 9 games, why isn't that the highest probability result???????????? 03-banghead

overly-simplistic response (what else would you expect from a dumb jock) but while we are favored in 9, there is a 'margin of error' in all of them.

I think the stats probably say that 7 of the 9 our 'favor' is outside the margin of error... on the other side, perhaps only one of the three is inside it. That would make sense if you think about rankings... 7 teams likely worse than 80... 2 teams probably in the top 25.... 2 teams probably ranked between 60 and 80... and then us and one other ranked between 60 and maybe 40.

We're expected to win 7 (all the teams ranked 80 or higher). Likely to win at least one and likely two more (the 60-80's)... MIGHT win a third (the one with us between 40 and 60)... unlikely to win the other two (top 25).

We'd have to significantly under perform our 'expected average performance' to win fewer than 7, and significantly out-perform our 'expected average performance' to win more than 10.... of course, assuming THEY all play to their pre-season expectations as well
08-11-2015 12:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Antarius Offline
Say no to cronyism
*

Posts: 11,959
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 87
I Root For: Rice
Location: KHOU
Post: #15
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 11:27 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(08-11-2015 11:22 AM)owl95 Wrote:  OO I want to win as well. 1 in 5 chance to win is not bad. It depends on how the Notre Dame game goes. If UT gets beat up, that could be good for us, sometimes losing badly is contagious. I feel like that is part of what happened vs ODU last year. I think might tune into the UT-Notre Dame game a bit to see how they look.

Yeah. I was referring to the people who will be satisfied with a good showing. That would be better than nothing, but as a goal it stinks.

I don't think that's the goal anyone has. Its just that if we HAVE to lose, please let it be in such a way that we are competitive.
08-11-2015 12:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hambone10 Offline
Hooter
*

Posts: 40,333
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 1290
I Root For: My Kids
Location: Right Down th Middle

New Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #16
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 12:52 PM)Antarius Wrote:  
(08-11-2015 11:27 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(08-11-2015 11:22 AM)owl95 Wrote:  OO I want to win as well. 1 in 5 chance to win is not bad. It depends on how the Notre Dame game goes. If UT gets beat up, that could be good for us, sometimes losing badly is contagious. I feel like that is part of what happened vs ODU last year. I think might tune into the UT-Notre Dame game a bit to see how they look.

Yeah. I was referring to the people who will be satisfied with a good showing. That would be better than nothing, but as a goal it stinks.

I don't think that's the goal anyone has. Its just that if we HAVE to lose, please let it be in such a way that we are competitive.

and preferably to a very good team

preference 1, beat everyone including some very good teams. We're likely top 15 and maybe even better.

preference 2, beat everyone and have some 'names' that aren't very good that year for some reason

preference 3, only lose to very good teams and do so in a competitive manner. We're likely top 20

Preference 4, only lose to very good teams but not be competitive, we're perhaps top 40 to 60 depending on whom we get a shot at in the bowl.


there is no preference 5.
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2015 01:23 PM by Hambone10.)
08-11-2015 01:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


OwlAndSparrow Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 14
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation: 4
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #17
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 09:28 AM)OWLmanz Wrote:  WHAT?? I hear what you're saying, but I find it hard to believe.............. I'm probably too "simplisticly rational" I guess! 03-nutkick Also, if we are truly favored in 9 games, why isn't that the highest probability result???????????? 03-banghead

(08-11-2015 08:40 AM)baker-13 Wrote:  
(08-11-2015 07:46 AM)OWLmanz Wrote:  01-wingedeagle OK I am "just" an "academ," but how can 9 and 10 wins be the most likely scenarios, since the data table appears to show 8 wins as the highest probability outcome, with 7 wins as the second highest probability????? 04-jawdrop Makes no sense..... 03-banghead

Of course, we learned even in Econ and Finance, that you can interpret statistics any way that you want...........

"Most likely scenario" = most specific exact combination of things. You get higher probabilities for 7 and 8 wins because there are more different combinations that lead to 7 or 8 wins than there are 9 or 10 wins, even if those individual combinations have a lower probability that the most likely 9- and 10-win combinations.

Even if we were favored in all 12 games, 12 wins wouldn't be the most likely result.

Let's call the games A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and L. We'll call the probability of winning each W(X) for game X. So, if A is against Wagner, then W(A) is close to 100%, so probably something like .99. For each game, the probability of losing, L(X), is 1 - W(X), so L(A) is about .01.

Since each game is DIFFERENT, then the probability of having a particular season is the product of the probabilities for each game. Kinda like the probability of flipping a coin heads and then tails is .5 * .5 = .25. Now, the probability of getting one heads and one tails is .5, since you get HT 25% of the time and TH 25% of the time.

So, the probability of winning all 12 games is:

W(A)*W(B)*W©*W(D)*W(E)*W(F)*W(G)*W(H)*W(I)*W(J)*W(K)*W(L)

The probability of getting 11 wins is not so easy to write, because there are 12 ways it could happen, with some much more likely than others (e.g., it's EXTREMELY unlikely we'll beat Texas and Baylor but lose to Wagner).

So, we'd take L(A)*W(B)*W©* ... * W(K)*W(L), the first way to win 11 games, then add

W(A)*L(B)*W©* .. *W(K)*W(L),

then add

W(A)*W(B)*L©*W(D)* ... *W(K)*W(L),

and so on. Add those all up to get the probability of winning 11 games.

For 10, 9, 8, and so on, there are a lot more terms that need to be added up.


In the end, games B, D, and H are the hardest games. W(H) is about .5, it sounds like. W(B) is about .20, and W(D) is something small. These are the ones where L(B) and L(D) are higher than W(B) and W(D), and W(H) is about the same as L(H).

Thus,

W(A)*L(D)*W©*L(D)*W(E)*W(F)*W(G)*L(H)*W(I)*W(J)*W(K)*W(L)

and

W(A)*L(D)*W©*L(D)*W(E)*W(F)*W(G)*W(H)*W(I)*W(J)*W(K)*W(L)

are the most likely seasons.


Now, looking at the other nine games, we're favored in all of them, BUT that doesn't mean it's likely we'll actually win all of them. It's like, roll a die nine times. Count how many times you roll higher than a 2. Each individual time you roll, you're probably getting higher than a 2, but the chances of ALL NINE rolls being higher than 2 are very small (about .00005).

So, the season

W(A)*L(D)*L©*L(D)*W(E)*W(F)*W(G)*L(H)*W(I)*W(J)*W(K)*W(L)

is less likely than the one where we just lose to Texas and Baylor, but if we take into account ALL of the other nine games (and LaTech is a coin flip), we're more likely to lose one or two of them than we are to win all of them.
08-11-2015 01:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OWLmanz Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 954
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation: 1
I Root For: OWLS & TEXANS
Location: River Oaks
Post: #18
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
04-jawdrop WHAT? [actually didn't even read the reply below; if I had wanted a statistics lesson, I would have signed up for Continuing Ed....] 03-banghead

(08-11-2015 01:41 PM)OwlAndSparrow Wrote:  
(08-11-2015 09:28 AM)OWLmanz Wrote:  WHAT?? I hear what you're saying, but I find it hard to believe.............. I'm probably too "simplisticly rational" I guess! 03-nutkick Also, if we are truly favored in 9 games, why isn't that the highest probability result???????????? 03-banghead

(08-11-2015 08:40 AM)baker-13 Wrote:  
(08-11-2015 07:46 AM)OWLmanz Wrote:  01-wingedeagle OK I am "just" an "academ," but how can 9 and 10 wins be the most likely scenarios, since the data table appears to show 8 wins as the highest probability outcome, with 7 wins as the second highest probability????? 04-jawdrop Makes no sense..... 03-banghead

Of course, we learned even in Econ and Finance, that you can interpret statistics any way that you want...........

"Most likely scenario" = most specific exact combination of things. You get higher probabilities for 7 and 8 wins because there are more different combinations that lead to 7 or 8 wins than there are 9 or 10 wins, even if those individual combinations have a lower probability that the most likely 9- and 10-win combinations.

Even if we were favored in all 12 games, 12 wins wouldn't be the most likely result.

Let's call the games A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and L. We'll call the probability of winning each W(X) for game X. So, if A is against Wagner, then W(A) is close to 100%, so probably something like .99. For each game, the probability of losing, L(X), is 1 - W(X), so L(A) is about .01.

Since each game is DIFFERENT, then the probability of having a particular season is the product of the probabilities for each game. Kinda like the probability of flipping a coin heads and then tails is .5 * .5 = .25. Now, the probability of getting one heads and one tails is .5, since you get HT 25% of the time and TH 25% of the time.

So, the probability of winning all 12 games is:

W(A)*W(B)*W©*W(D)*W(E)*W(F)*W(G)*W(H)*W(I)*W(J)*W(K)*W(L)

The probability of getting 11 wins is not so easy to write, because there are 12 ways it could happen, with some much more likely than others (e.g., it's EXTREMELY unlikely we'll beat Texas and Baylor but lose to Wagner).

So, we'd take L(A)*W(B)*W©* ... * W(K)*W(L), the first way to win 11 games, then add

W(A)*L(B)*W©* .. *W(K)*W(L),

then add

W(A)*W(B)*L©*W(D)* ... *W(K)*W(L),

and so on. Add those all up to get the probability of winning 11 games.

For 10, 9, 8, and so on, there are a lot more terms that need to be added up.


In the end, games B, D, and H are the hardest games. W(H) is about .5, it sounds like. W(B) is about .20, and W(D) is something small. These are the ones where L(B) and L(D) are higher than W(B) and W(D), and W(H) is about the same as L(H).

Thus,

W(A)*L(D)*W©*L(D)*W(E)*W(F)*W(G)*L(H)*W(I)*W(J)*W(K)*W(L)

and

W(A)*L(D)*W©*L(D)*W(E)*W(F)*W(G)*W(H)*W(I)*W(J)*W(K)*W(L)

are the most likely seasons.


Now, looking at the other nine games, we're favored in all of them, BUT that doesn't mean it's likely we'll actually win all of them. It's like, roll a die nine times. Count how many times you roll higher than a 2. Each individual time you roll, you're probably getting higher than a 2, but the chances of ALL NINE rolls being higher than 2 are very small (about .00005).

So, the season

W(A)*L(D)*L©*L(D)*W(E)*W(F)*W(G)*L(H)*W(I)*W(J)*W(K)*W(L)

is less likely than the one where we just lose to Texas and Baylor, but if we take into account ALL of the other nine games (and LaTech is a coin flip), we're more likely to lose one or two of them than we are to win all of them.
08-11-2015 01:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MOBalum Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 559
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 14
I Root For:
Location:

Baseball GeniusNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #19
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-11-2015 01:51 PM)OWLmanz Wrote:  04-jawdrop WHAT? [actually didn't even read the reply below; if I had wanted a statistics lesson, I would have signed up for Continuing Ed....] 03-banghead

So first you say that the result doesn't make sense, then imply that people are interpreting statistics however they want, and finally you complain when someone gives you an explanation that's too mathematically rigorous for your limited patience.

sigh... I'll try...

Consider a 10-game schedule in which Rice is favored to win every game with an 80% probability.

The most likely outcome of Game 1 is that we win - woo hoo!

The most likely outcome of Game 2 is that we win - Go Owls!

The most likely outcome of Game 3 is that we win - Hootie Hoot!

The most likely outcome of Game 4 is that we win - Oh Yeah!

etc.

So the most likely outcome is that we're 10-0. Everyone agrees with that? Good.

Now for the tricky part - although an upset in any particular game is unlikely (1 in 5 chance based on the percentages), it would be very, very difficult to get through that season without any upsets. Doing the math, the probability of running the table is only 10.7%. In other words, although there's a 20% chance of an upset in any specific game, there is a 90% chance of at least one upset if you consider the entire season.

What's the most likely record for this hypothetical team? It's 8-2! Applying the math from OwlandSparrow shows that an 8-2 record has a probability of 30%, followed by 9-1 (27%) and 7-3 (20%). That 8-2 record isn't surprising - the 80% probability of winning each game means that against every team we play, we should win 8 out of 10 games. QED.[/i]
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2015 02:16 PM by MOBalum.)
08-11-2015 02:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
talon owl Offline
Chicken Fingers Justin
*

Posts: 10,277
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 38
I Root For: The OE Arrrrrgh
Location: North/South Face

New Orleans BowlThe Parliament Awards
Post: #20
RE: 2016 Massey Percentages
(08-10-2015 11:52 PM)baker-13 Wrote:  As with last year, Ken Massey has predicted results for our schedule this year.

I took the liberty of throwing these percentages into a trusty Excel spreadsheet (based on one JOwl built for this last year) to see what happened. It's attached for anyone who wants to play along.

Quick summary of probabilities of given win totals:
0 wins: 0.0000% (taking this out to ten decimals still yields zero's)
1 win: 0.0002%
2: 0.0061%
3: 0.0994%
4: 0.8350%
5: 4.0858%
6: 12.3686%
7: 23.7070%
8: 28.5493%
9: 20.6881%
10: 8.1672%
11: 1.4196%
12: 0.0738%

There are two scenarios tied for the most likely individual set of outcomes: 9-3 (losses to Texas, Baylor, and LaTech), and 10-2 (flip the LaTech result).

I plan on keeping this updated as the season goes along. If nothing else, it's something to amuse myself with as time goes on.

I don't see the spreadsheet attachment. ?
08-11-2015 06:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.