It's Friday, which means we have another round of classified emails from the Clinton email server that lying Hillary said never existed.

By the way, we know they are classified because of "content redacted due to material being classified."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/...fied-info/

(07-31-2015 01:30 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  It's Friday, which means we have another round of classified emails from the Clinton email server that lying Hillary said never existed.

By the way, we know they are classified because of "content redacted due to material being classified."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/...fied-info/

Who was the source? You? Stinkfist? Owl @'s?

(07-31-2015 01:40 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-31-2015 01:30 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  It's Friday, which means we have another round of classified emails from the Clinton email server that lying Hillary said never existed.

By the way, we know they are classified because of "content redacted due to material being classified."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/...fied-info/

Who was the source? You? Stinkfist? Owl @'s?

The IG's at the CIA and State Department.

Tote that water harder.

(07-31-2015 01:48 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-31-2015 01:40 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-31-2015 01:30 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  It's Friday, which means we have another round of classified emails from the Clinton email server that lying Hillary said never existed.

By the way, we know they are classified because of "content redacted due to material being classified."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/...fied-info/

Who was the source? You? Stinkfist? Owl @'s?

The IG's at the CIA and State Department.

Tote that water harder.

They may be putting out the e-mails but who was the source that said that they were classified? Brw, I prefer Bernie over Hillary.

(07-31-2015 01:30 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  It's Friday, which means we have another round of classified emails from the Clinton email server that lying Hillary said never existed.

By the way, we know they are classified because of "content redacted due to material being classified."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/...fied-info/

But, we've been told repeatedly around here that the Cank hasn't lied about anything.

The IG's are clearly part of the VRWC.


And racists. Clearly racists. Jus' cause.

(07-31-2015 01:55 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-31-2015 01:48 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-31-2015 01:40 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-31-2015 01:30 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  It's Friday, which means we have another round of classified emails from the Clinton email server that lying Hillary said never existed.

By the way, we know they are classified because of "content redacted due to material being classified."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/...fied-info/

Who was the source? You? Stinkfist? Owl @'s?

The IG's at the CIA and State Department.

Tote that water harder.

They may be putting out the e-mails but who was the source that said that they were classified?

The IG's arenot putting out the emails. The IG's are reporting that they have found emails tha tcame from her server (or were sent to her server) that were CLASSIFIED AT THE TIME THEY WERE SENT OR RECEIVED.

The state department is releasing these emails, and another batch today had redactions because they contain classified material.

Wonder how she looks in orange?

Have you actually looked at any of those e-mails?

I had to wade through about a dozen before I found one in which Hillary said anything more than "See b/l"

Every single one was forwarded and had a e-mail chain going to two or more recipients at some point.

What a colossal waste of time and money.

(07-31-2015 02:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

Have you actually looked at any of those e-mails?

I had to wade through about a dozen before I found one in which Hillary said anything more than "See b/l"

Every single one was forwarded and had a e-mail chain going to two or more recipients at some point.

What a colossal waste of time and money.

A whole DOZEN?!? Say it ain't so!!!

So the IG's are a part of the VRWC? Is that what your guessing?

This should simply be dropped? One set of rules for everyone else, one set of rules for HDR22?

I mean, she is almost queen, right?

(07-31-2015 02:15 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-31-2015 02:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

Have you actually looked at any of those e-mails?

I had to wade through about a dozen before I found one in which Hillary said anything more than "See b/l"

Every single one was forwarded and had a e-mail chain going to two or more recipients at some point.

What a colossal waste of time and money.

A whole DOZEN?!? Say it ain't so!!!

So the IG's are a part of the VRWC? Is that what your guessing?

This should simply be dropped? One set of rules for everyone else, one set of rules for HDR22?

I mean, she is almost queen, right?

Go read them...I went through about 20 more. Almost every one is just boring itinerary information stuff that was sent to Hillary as an FYI.

Almost none of them contained any reply from Hillary. And the ones that did were again just trivial crap.

But by all means...keep hoping you're going to find the one where she orders the death of Stevens.

So I'll put you down as a "Yes" for the special rules and laws for the Cankles.

Got it.




Wonder how long until the search warrant is executed?

(07-31-2015 03:02 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  So I'll put you down as a "Yes" for the special rules and laws for the Cankles.

Got it.




Wonder how long until the search warrant is executed?

What special rules? When have I ever said that Hillary was allowed to keep a separate account or delete e-mails, etc.?

And wasn't the law at the time that they just needed to save the pertinent e-mails and not everything? Honestly, I don't remember.

But I'll guess the warrant will be executed the same day the ACA dies. So it will happen tomorrow.

That the private server exists at all should make her unfit to be president. The content of the emails is really immaterial.