Let's say I'm a Muslim and I walk into a store like this. How is this guy gonna know, other than posting a sign that says "WE DON'T SERVE MUSLIMS"?

I could buy my gun and then go back and say - Haha! Bought a gun from you and I'm a Muslim. You are a failure at discrimination

And then the guy just looks stupid for selling a gun to a Muslim when he couldn't tell otherwise. That's what comes to mind first at this.

(08-01-2015 09:11 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Isn't the Spin Room Muslim free? Kaplony needs to take down his sig.

Nothing muslim in my signature.

(08-01-2015 01:46 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  Let's say I'm a Muslim and I walk into a store like this. How is this guy gonna know, other than posting a sign that says "WE DON'T SERVE MUSLIMS"?

I could buy my gun and then go back and say - Haha! Bought a gun from you and I'm a Muslim. You are a failure at discrimination

And then the guy just looks stupid for selling a gun to a Muslim when he couldn't tell otherwise. That's what comes to mind first at this.

Stupid post of the day. So far...

(08-01-2015 02:11 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 01:46 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  Let's say I'm a Muslim and I walk into a store like this. How is this guy gonna know, other than posting a sign that says "WE DON'T SERVE MUSLIMS"?

I could buy my gun and then go back and say - Haha! Bought a gun from you and I'm a Muslim. You are a failure at discrimination

And then the guy just looks stupid for selling a gun to a Muslim when he couldn't tell otherwise. That's what comes to mind first at this.

Stupid post of the day. So far...

Why is that stupid? This is all about making some political point, but in practice there is no way to stop Muslims from buying guns at some store unless you ask everyone to - as has been suggested in this thread - eat bacon or something. And even then, some Muslims might do it still. The whole idea of "Muslim free stores" is what's stupid.

So again I'll ask which Section or Amendment to the Constitution covers the scenario you insist upon promoting here?

(08-01-2015 02:35 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  So again I'll ask which Section or Amendment to the Constitution covers the scenario you insist upon promoting here?

Just to be clear. You are openly advocating for discriminating Muslims simply because of their religion? And you also that you could not understand my last post?

(08-01-2015 02:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 02:35 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  So again I'll ask which Section or Amendment to the Constitution covers the scenario you insist upon promoting here?

Just to be clear. You are openly advocating for discriminating Muslims simply because of their religion? And you also that you could not understand my last post?

I'm not advocating anything.

I'm questioning your erroneous statement earlier in this thread that this gun shop owner and/or the GOP was against the Constitution. I have asked you civilly many time since to please point out which part of the Constitution this scenario violates and as you typically do you refuse to do so in an extremely childish manner. What's really sad is you are so determined not to be proven wrong that you have not only failed to acknowledge the fact that you have already been corrected, but also the fact that all of your leftist butt-buddies who would normally rush in to your defense have left you to tilt at this windmill all by yourself.

(08-01-2015 02:52 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 02:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 02:35 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  So again I'll ask which Section or Amendment to the Constitution covers the scenario you insist upon promoting here?

Just to be clear. You are openly advocating for discriminating Muslims simply because of their religion? And you also that you could not understand my last post?

I'm not advocating anything.

I'm questioning your erroneous statement earlier in this thread that this gun shop owner and/or the GOP was against the Constitution. I have asked you civilly many time since to please point out which part of the Constitution this scenario violates and as you typically do you refuse to do so in an extremely childish manner. What's really sad is you are so determined not to be proven wrong that you have not only failed to acknowledge the fact that you have already been corrected, but also the fact that all of your leftist butt-buddies who would normally rush in to your defense have left you to tilt at this windmill all by yourself.

Well you are clearly defending a very sickening stance.

It's not an erroneous statement. I've already explained this to you dumb***

(08-01-2015 02:44 PM)smudge12 Wrote:  Yeah, I don't get how the owner can find out other than asking. Also, the pig suggestions are ridiculous. When I used to be Muslim, I ate pig and I knew a ton of other Muslims who did too.

So you used to CALL yourself a Muslim.

(08-01-2015 02:14 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 02:11 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 01:46 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  Let's say I'm a Muslim and I walk into a store like this. How is this guy gonna know, other than posting a sign that says "WE DON'T SERVE MUSLIMS"?

I could buy my gun and then go back and say - Haha! Bought a gun from you and I'm a Muslim. You are a failure at discrimination

And then the guy just looks stupid for selling a gun to a Muslim when he couldn't tell otherwise. That's what comes to mind first at this.

Stupid post of the day. So far...

Why is that stupid? This is all about making some political point, but in practice there is no way to stop Muslims from buying guns at some store unless you ask everyone to - as has been suggested in this thread - eat bacon or something. And even then, some Muslims might do it still. The whole idea of "Muslim free stores" is what's stupid.

Gun free zones don't stop anyone, be they lawful citizens or criminals/insane nuts, from entering with guns.

It's a sign. It can't possibly keep Muslims out. He's just posting he would rather a Muslim **** off.

(08-01-2015 02:15 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 01:27 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 10:47 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 09:44 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 01:25 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  So what you are saying is you can't point out what "blatant" as you claim.


Remember, this is the Richard Simmons Spin Room and you are required to provide proof of your claims. All I'm asking for is for you to provide the proof. Which part of the US Constitution did this gun shop owner and/or the GOP violate in this case? Either back up your claim or admit you were wrong.

Shouldn't be that hard for you, what with it being "blatant" and all.


(Notice that unlike you I didn't resort to juvenile insults. That should be your first clue that you've lost and the best course of action for you is to admit defeat and bow out with what little dignity you can salvage here )

No what I am saying is that you are such a pee brain that I am no longer feeding into your bull****. If you think discrimination based on ones religion is acceptable in anyway then you are a bigoted idiotic fool. If you think there are no constitutional protections then you are even more delusional then I ever thought.

Your version of america is a scary world to think about it and I am glad that people like you have absolutely no say.

Well, technically, Kaplony is right, there is nothing in the constitution that bans a private citizen from discriminating against another person. The constitution places restrictions on government action. There are statutes which prohibit discrimination by private persons which are based upon public accommodation theories and the commerce clause.

You went and ruined it I figured as stubborn as johnnyzero is I could get at least a week of fun out of yet again exposing him as the fool he is.

What neither of you understand is that the interpretations of the constitution has changed over time thanks to court rulings. Why do you think it took an amendment for prohibition however in the modern era that isn't needed?

It seems like neither of you have an understanding as to how our govt works and one of you is an extremely bigoted prick who resorts to a troll talking point and has "american" values that are more on par with n@zi germany than actual american values.

I agree that the Court changes interpretations of the Constitution over time. I was merely pointing out that nothing in the Constitution prohibits discrimination by a private actor (with the arguable exception being the 13th amendment as to discrimination against African Americans only). Rather, it is the laws of Congress (and states) that prohibit discrimination by private actors. That's all I was pointing out. I do agree with you, what the store owner is doing is against the law and could get him sued.

Here's a good explanation of the law on the subject:

Link to University of Baltimore Article

(08-01-2015 02:03 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 09:11 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Isn't the Spin Room Muslim free? Kaplony needs to take down his sig.

Nothing muslim in my signature.

He thought the flag was Islamic due to the crescent but I looked it up and it appears to be some sort of racist South Carolina confederacy flag.

(08-01-2015 04:01 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 02:03 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 09:11 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Isn't the Spin Room Muslim free? Kaplony needs to take down his sig.

Nothing muslim in my signature.

He thought the flag was Islamic due to the crescent but I looked it up and it appears to be some sort of racist South Carolina confederacy flag.

Racist in what way?

And to correct your ignorance it's like every other SC flag and not a crescent. It's a gorget of the style of the troops on Fort Sullivan.

(08-01-2015 09:47 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 04:01 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 02:03 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 09:11 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Isn't the Spin Room Muslim free? Kaplony needs to take down his sig.

Nothing muslim in my signature.

He thought the flag was Islamic due to the crescent but I looked it up and it appears to be some sort of racist South Carolina confederacy flag.

Racist in what way?

And to correct your ignorance it's like every other SC flag and not a crescent. It's a gorget of the style of the troops on Fort Sullivan.

Oh, not racist but treasonous. That's much better.

(08-01-2015 01:46 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  Let's say I'm a Muslim and I walk into a store like this. How is this guy gonna know, other than posting a sign that says "WE DON'T SERVE MUSLIMS"?

I could buy my gun and then go back and say - Haha! Bought a gun from you and I'm a Muslim. You are a failure at discrimination

And then the guy just looks stupid for selling a gun to a Muslim when he couldn't tell otherwise. That's what comes to mind first at this.

This was my question... what's he going to do, keep an eye out for traditional Muslim garb?

What's he going to do when a Sikh walks in with a Turban, accuse them of being Muslim?

(08-01-2015 09:47 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 04:01 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 02:03 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 09:11 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Isn't the Spin Room Muslim free? Kaplony needs to take down his sig.

Nothing muslim in my signature.

He thought the flag was Islamic due to the crescent but I looked it up and it appears to be some sort of racist South Carolina confederacy flag.

Racist in what way?

And to correct your ignorance it's like every other SC flag and not a crescent. It's a gorget of the style of the troops on Fort Sullivan.

Just trollin'. I know nothing about the history of that flag.

(08-01-2015 10:05 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 09:47 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 04:01 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 02:03 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 09:11 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Isn't the Spin Room Muslim free? Kaplony needs to take down his sig.

Nothing muslim in my signature.

He thought the flag was Islamic due to the crescent but I looked it up and it appears to be some sort of racist South Carolina confederacy flag.

Racist in what way?

And to correct your ignorance it's like every other SC flag and not a crescent. It's a gorget of the style of the troops on Fort Sullivan.

Oh, not racist but treasonous. That's much better.

Treasonous to you maybe, I look at it like the Founding Fathers looked at it when they created this country. When their existing government took stances that would lead to the absolute destruction of their way of life they took up arms and rid themselves of the oppression. In the process they created a new nation, much like what South Carolina desired to do when it left a union it voluntarily joined.

If things continue the way they are going currently with the oppressive central government trying to take control over every aspect of our lives I hope that if logic doesn't prevail that a new breed of patriots have the guts to do the same and return at least a few of us closer to what the Founding Fathers intended for this country to be instead of the vision that you leftists have currently.

(08-01-2015 01:27 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 10:47 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 09:44 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 01:25 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  So what you are saying is you can't point out what "blatant" as you claim.


Remember, this is the Richard Simmons Spin Room and you are required to provide proof of your claims. All I'm asking for is for you to provide the proof. Which part of the US Constitution did this gun shop owner and/or the GOP violate in this case? Either back up your claim or admit you were wrong.

Shouldn't be that hard for you, what with it being "blatant" and all.


(Notice that unlike you I didn't resort to juvenile insults. That should be your first clue that you've lost and the best course of action for you is to admit defeat and bow out with what little dignity you can salvage here )

No what I am saying is that you are such a pee brain that I am no longer feeding into your bull****. If you think discrimination based on ones religion is acceptable in anyway then you are a bigoted idiotic fool. If you think there are no constitutional protections then you are even more delusional then I ever thought.

Your version of america is a scary world to think about it and I am glad that people like you have absolutely no say.

Well, technically, Kaplony is right, there is nothing in the constitution that bans a private citizen from discriminating against another person. The constitution places restrictions on government action. There are statutes which prohibit discrimination by private persons which are based upon public accommodation theories and the commerce clause.

You went and ruined it I figured as stubborn as johnnyzero is I could get at least a week of fun out of yet again exposing him as the fool he is.

He's just repeating what his mommy has told him. Bless his heart !

(08-01-2015 10:25 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 10:05 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 09:47 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 04:01 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 02:03 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Nothing muslim in my signature.

He thought the flag was Islamic due to the crescent but I looked it up and it appears to be some sort of racist South Carolina confederacy flag.

Racist in what way?

And to correct your ignorance it's like every other SC flag and not a crescent. It's a gorget of the style of the troops on Fort Sullivan.

Oh, not racist but treasonous. That's much better.

Treasonous to you maybe, I look at it like the Founding Fathers looked at it when they created this country. When their existing government took stances that would lead to the absolute destruction of their way of life they took up arms and rid themselves of the oppression. In the process they created a new nation, much like what South Carolina desired to do when it left a union it voluntarily joined.

If things continue the way they are going currently with the oppressive central government trying to take control over every aspect of our lives I hope that if logic doesn't prevail that a new breed of patriots have the guts to do the same and return at least a few of us closer to what the Founding Fathers intended for this country to be instead of the vision that you leftists have currently.

That's all fine and dandy until you recognize that the way of life they wanted to defend was an industrial economy based around and rooted in slavery. That's not exactly something I would think you would be proud of saying your ancestors stood for. And our government is not trying to control every aspect of our lives, unless of course you're gay, black, or a woman. Or a combo of all three.

(08-01-2015 12:19 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-31-2015 07:14 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  It's easy, just make a line across the entrance with pigs blood and anyone that doesn't want to go in, fine. It's his business he can do anything he wants.

John, and thinking all Muslims are one race is RACIST.

No the OP is racist. Oh and just an FYI you are only calling others racist because you know damn well just how terrible your own viewpoints are.

I'm just joining the club. It's part of the initiation.

And Johnny O, America is spelled with a Big A. You Communist.