Sadly you can't go back...

The Grizzlies pick

I think you could place just about anyone but thabeet in that spot and we would all be happy.

Thabeet was one of the most easy to spot busts in Nba history yet we still drafted him

That was Heisley for you

I really don't understand the Ty Lawson love in that column. No way he was the 4th best.

Tyreke waaaaay too low on that.

(07-30-2015 10:54 PM)ksigtigerdood Wrote:  I really don't understand the Ty Lawson love in that column. No way he was the 4th best.

What player ranked below him is clearly better?

(07-31-2015 04:30 PM)Dynamos Wrote:  

(07-30-2015 10:54 PM)ksigtigerdood Wrote:  I really don't understand the Ty Lawson love in that column. No way he was the 4th best.

What player ranked below him is clearly better?

Ty Lawson is not that high of a pick. Sacramento wouldn't take him if they had that draft to do over again.

(07-30-2015 10:54 PM)ksigtigerdood Wrote:  I really don't understand the Ty Lawson love in that column. No way he was the 4th best.

15.2 PPG and 9.6 APG is pretty solid lol.

(08-01-2015 01:49 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(07-31-2015 04:30 PM)Dynamos Wrote:  

(07-30-2015 10:54 PM)ksigtigerdood Wrote:  I really don't understand the Ty Lawson love in that column. No way he was the 4th best.

What player ranked below him is clearly better?

Ty Lawson is not that high of a pick. Sacramento wouldn't take him if they had that draft to do over again.

What player ranked below him is clearly better?

That's not my point. My point is Sacramento would not take him there. If this ranking is a tell of what they have done so far in the league then he definitely didn't belong that high.

I would take Wes Matthews over Lawson. I would take Teague over Lawson. I would take Tyreke over Lawson.

(08-01-2015 10:07 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  That's not my point. My point is Sacramento would not take him there. If this ranking is a tell of what they have done so far in the league then he definitely didn't belong that high.

I would take Wes Matthews over Lawson. I would take Teague over Lawson. I would take Tyreke over Lawson.

And that's your opinion however others would take Lawson over those 3. None are clearly better than the other so arguing about it seems silly to me. Lawson is arguably the 4th best player from that draft and he's fouth on the redraft. I don't see the problem?

(08-01-2015 11:26 AM)Dynamos Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 10:07 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  That's not my point. My point is Sacramento would not take him there. If this ranking is a tell of what they have done so far in the league then he definitely didn't belong that high.

I would take Wes Matthews over Lawson. I would take Teague over Lawson. I would take Tyreke over Lawson.

And that's your opinion however others would take Lawson over those 3. None are clearly better than the other so arguing about it seems silly to me. Lawson is arguably the 4th best player from that draft and he's fouth on the redraft. I don't see the problem?

The problem is when you do a redraft it's usually based on what they have done. What has Lawson done that's put him 4th overall? Heck Tyreke has done more than Lawson.

(08-01-2015 01:24 PM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 11:26 AM)Dynamos Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 10:07 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  That's not my point. My point is Sacramento would not take him there. If this ranking is a tell of what they have done so far in the league then he definitely didn't belong that high.

I would take Wes Matthews over Lawson. I would take Teague over Lawson. I would take Tyreke over Lawson.

And that's your opinion however others would take Lawson over those 3. None are clearly better than the other so arguing about it seems silly to me. Lawson is arguably the 4th best player from that draft and he's fouth on the redraft. I don't see the problem?

The problem is when you do a redraft it's usually based on what they have done. What has Lawson done that's put him 4th overall? Heck Tyreke has done more than Lawson.

What have Evans, Teague and Matthews done that clearly and undeniably puts them above Lawson? All four players have accomplished about the same. You could probably make an argument for all 4 players to be at 4

(08-01-2015 01:52 PM)Dynamos Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 01:24 PM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 11:26 AM)Dynamos Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 10:07 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  That's not my point. My point is Sacramento would not take him there. If this ranking is a tell of what they have done so far in the league then he definitely didn't belong that high.

I would take Wes Matthews over Lawson. I would take Teague over Lawson. I would take Tyreke over Lawson.

And that's your opinion however others would take Lawson over those 3. None are clearly better than the other so arguing about it seems silly to me. Lawson is arguably the 4th best player from that draft and he's fouth on the redraft. I don't see the problem?

The problem is when you do a redraft it's usually based on what they have done. What has Lawson done that's put him 4th overall? Heck Tyreke has done more than Lawson.

What have Evans, Teague and Matthews done? All four players have accomplished about the same. You could probably make an argument for all 4 players to be at 4

Well for starters Tyreke was rookie of the year from that group. So I'd say that's more than what the other 3 have done.

Lawson isn't the fourth best player from that class. Anyone that thinks that hasn't watched him play.

(08-01-2015 01:55 PM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 01:52 PM)Dynamos Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 01:24 PM)tigers0830 Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 11:26 AM)Dynamos Wrote:  

(08-01-2015 10:07 AM)tigers0830 Wrote:  That's not my point. My point is Sacramento would not take him there. If this ranking is a tell of what they have done so far in the league then he definitely didn't belong that high.

I would take Wes Matthews over Lawson. I would take Teague over Lawson. I would take Tyreke over Lawson.

And that's your opinion however others would take Lawson over those 3. None are clearly better than the other so arguing about it seems silly to me. Lawson is arguably the 4th best player from that draft and he's fouth on the redraft. I don't see the problem?

The problem is when you do a redraft it's usually based on what they have done. What has Lawson done that's put him 4th overall? Heck Tyreke has done more than Lawson.

What have Evans, Teague and Matthews done? All four players have accomplished about the same. You could probably make an argument for all 4 players to be at 4

Well for starters Tyreke was rookie of the year from that group. So I'd say that's more than what the other 3 have done.

Lawson isn't the fourth best player from that class. Anyone that thinks that hasn't watched him play.

I don't think winning an award 6 years ago should be the determining factor. Evans has barely been to the playoffs but Lawson has been the best player on four playoff teams. I just don't think there is enough difference between the four to argue about who goes where. They're interchangeable. Shoot I would probably put Derozan over Lawson and Matthews and he's not even in the conversation

(07-30-2015 06:42 PM)Dynamos Wrote:  Thabeet was one of the most easy to spot busts in Nba history yet we still drafted him

I don't follow the draft very closely , yet when someone told me that the Grizz were taking Thabeet at #2, I said, the Grizzlies were putting up a smokescreen for some reason and that there is NO WAY the are taking Thabeet at #2.

I thought they were trading the pick for a player and the #10- #15 pick and were trying to position it like they were getting their pick AND a player, boy did they make me look stupid...