(07-23-2015 08:29 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote: He says all the things I WISH Conservative politicians would say, but I do wish he had a bit more tact. But since he's not a serious candidate anyway, thankfully he's at least getting the conversations STARTED.
We wouldn't be talking about illegal immigration or Sanctuary Cities if it weren't for Trump. The narrative would still be "Republicans need to get on board with immigration..."
Fair statements. I still think however that republicans must win the Hispanic vote to have a chance. Immigration reform is their only chance.
The bolded part is debatable. What is not debatable is they need to win and turnout the white vote to have a chance. Anyone supporting amnesty is going to have problems there.
Fine. Just stay home. And then complain about Clinton 2.0 for 8 years.
.
Will do. There is no philosophical difference between Clinton, Bush, Rubio, and Kasich. And any of them will be controlled by the same lobbies. The fighting between them is simply elaborate kabuki theatre to keep the proles busy arguing amongst themselves about schit like abortion, race, taxes and the war on women whilst their legislative, monitary, diplomatic, and fiscal policies are exactly the same.
(07-23-2015 08:29 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote: He says all the things I WISH Conservative politicians would say, but I do wish he had a bit more tact. But since he's not a serious candidate anyway, thankfully he's at least getting the conversations STARTED.
We wouldn't be talking about illegal immigration or Sanctuary Cities if it weren't for Trump. The narrative would still be "Republicans need to get on board with immigration..."
Fair statements. I still think however that republicans must win the Hispanic vote to have a chance. Immigration reform is their only chance.
The bolded part is debatable. What is not debatable is they need to win and turnout the white vote to have a chance. Anyone supporting amnesty is going to have problems there.
Fine. Just stay home. And then complain about Clinton 2.0 for 8 years.
.
Will do. There is no philosophical difference between Clinton, Bush, Rubio, and Kasich. And any of them will be controlled by the same lobbies. The fighting between them is simply elaborate kabuki theatre to keep the proles busy arguing amongst themselves about schit like abortion, race, taxes and the war on women whilst their legislative, monitary, diplomatic, and fiscal policies are exactly the same.
Would you rather Clinton or Bush/Rubio/Kasich appoint the next Supreme Court justice?
(07-23-2015 11:15 AM)Fitbud Wrote: Fair statements. I still think however that republicans must win the Hispanic vote to have a chance. Immigration reform is their only chance.
The bolded part is debatable. What is not debatable is they need to win and turnout the white vote to have a chance. Anyone supporting amnesty is going to have problems there.
Fine. Just stay home. And then complain about Clinton 2.0 for 8 years.
.
Will do. There is no philosophical difference between Clinton, Bush, Rubio, and Kasich. And any of them will be controlled by the same lobbies. The fighting between them is simply elaborate kabuki theatre to keep the proles busy arguing amongst themselves about schit like abortion, race, taxes and the war on women whilst their legislative, monitary, diplomatic, and fiscal policies are exactly the same.
Would you rather Clinton or Bush/Rubio/Kasich appoint the next Supreme Court justice?
(07-23-2015 09:17 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: Cooper is a tool.
Yeah...what a tool, indeed:
Pretty sure he knew there was a camera there to record this act of compassion.
Because if the camera WEREN'T there he'd have left the kid there? PLEASE.
Of all the CNN journalists to bash, Anderson is one with at least a shred of credibility left.
Maybe. I'm not saying with any certainty he wouldn't, but boy howdy did it sure help his image that that camera was there to record this act of compassion.
Quote:Maybe. I'm not saying with any certainty he wouldn't, but boy howdy did it sure help his image that that camera was there to record this act of compassion.
So you're attempting to villify him off of a maybe, could be, possibly, neverknowbutmight?
He did a nice thing. He got good press for it. Kudos to him. That doesn't change the nice thing nor that he was reporting in a dangerous area.
(07-23-2015 09:17 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: Cooper is a tool.
Yeah...what a tool, indeed:
Pretty sure he knew there was a camera there to record this act of compassion.
Because if the camera WEREN'T there he'd have left the kid there? PLEASE.
Of all the CNN journalists to bash, Anderson is one with at least a shred of credibility left.
Maybe. I'm not saying with any certainty he wouldn't, but boy howdy did it sure help his image that that camera was there to record this act of compassion.
(07-23-2015 08:29 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote: He says all the things I WISH Conservative politicians would say, but I do wish he had a bit more tact. But since he's not a serious candidate anyway, thankfully he's at least getting the conversations STARTED.
We wouldn't be talking about illegal immigration or Sanctuary Cities if it weren't for Trump. The narrative would still be "Republicans need to get on board with immigration..."
Fair statements. I still think however that republicans must win the Hispanic vote to have a chance. Immigration reform is their only chance.
The bolded part is debatable. What is not debatable is they need to win and turnout the white vote to have a chance. Anyone supporting amnesty is going to have problems there.
(07-23-2015 08:29 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote: He says all the things I WISH Conservative politicians would say, but I do wish he had a bit more tact. But since he's not a serious candidate anyway, thankfully he's at least getting the conversations STARTED.
We wouldn't be talking about illegal immigration or Sanctuary Cities if it weren't for Trump. The narrative would still be "Republicans need to get on board with immigration..."
Fair statements. I still think however that republicans must win the Hispanic vote to have a chance. Immigration reform is their only chance.
The bolded part is debatable. What is not debatable is they need to win and turnout the white vote to have a chance. Anyone supporting amnesty is going to have problems there.
Why? Are white people against amnesty?
Legal immigrants are against amnesty. Those waiting in line legally are also against amnesty. Blacks are against amnesty.
Liberal loony tunes and illegal felons are all for amnesty.
(07-23-2015 08:29 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote: He says all the things I WISH Conservative politicians would say, but I do wish he had a bit more tact. But since he's not a serious candidate anyway, thankfully he's at least getting the conversations STARTED.
We wouldn't be talking about illegal immigration or Sanctuary Cities if it weren't for Trump. The narrative would still be "Republicans need to get on board with immigration..."
Fair statements. I still think however that republicans must win the Hispanic vote to have a chance. Immigration reform is their only chance.
The bolded part is debatable. What is not debatable is they need to win and turnout the white vote to have a chance. Anyone supporting amnesty is going to have problems there.
Why? Are white people against amnesty?
Legal immigrants are against amnesty. Those waiting in line legally are also against amnesty. Blacks are against amnesty.
Liberal loony tunes and illegal felons are all for amnesty.
But he specifically said "white vote " I'd like to know why?
(07-24-2015 10:35 AM)UofMemphis Wrote: Yeah...what a tool, indeed:
Pretty sure he knew there was a camera there to record this act of compassion.
Because if the camera WEREN'T there he'd have left the kid there? PLEASE.
Of all the CNN journalists to bash, Anderson is one with at least a shred of credibility left.
Maybe. I'm not saying with any certainty he wouldn't, but boy howdy did it sure help his image that that camera was there to record this act of compassion.
(07-23-2015 11:15 AM)Fitbud Wrote: Fair statements. I still think however that republicans must win the Hispanic vote to have a chance. Immigration reform is their only chance.
The bolded part is debatable. What is not debatable is they need to win and turnout the white vote to have a chance. Anyone supporting amnesty is going to have problems there.
Why? Are white people against amnesty?
Legal immigrants are against amnesty. Those waiting in line legally are also against amnesty. Blacks are against amnesty.
Liberal loony tunes and illegal felons are all for amnesty.
But he specifically said "white vote " I'd like to know why?
Glad you see the absurdity of the notion that the GOP needs to support amnesty for the "hispanic vote".
![[Image: andersoncooperhaiti6.jpg]](https://horiwood.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/andersoncooperhaiti6.jpg)
