(07-22-2015 04:16 PM)perimeterpost Wrote:  The answer is smaller conferences, not larger. The ideal conference size is 10- in football you move to a 9 game conference schedule so everybody plays everybody every year. In basketball an 18 game conference schedule give every team a home/away series vs every other conference member.

Should football be a seperate indentity from the rest of the college sports? You could create new conferences like they already do in some sports like hockey. I know college rodeo have the conferences for schools in a region, not strung about. You could see U.Conn., U.Mass., Boston College and some others in a tight region.

(07-23-2015 01:30 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(07-22-2015 04:16 PM)perimeterpost Wrote:  The answer is smaller conferences, not larger. The ideal conference size is 10- in football you move to a 9 game conference schedule so everybody plays everybody every year. In basketball an 18 game conference schedule give every team a home/away series vs every other conference member.

Should football be a seperate indentity from the rest of the college sports? You could create new conferences like they already do in some sports like hockey. I know college rodeo have the conferences for schools in a region, not strung about. You could see U.Conn., U.Mass., Boston College and some others in a tight region.

BC would never agree to that.