CajunBlazer
1st String
Posts: 1,419
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 31
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
This was included in the just issued UAB Booster Bulletin:
Message from Director of Athletics Mark Ingram
Blazer AD updates recent football announcement
June 25, 2015
Dear Blazer Family:
We are very pleased with the growing excitement about plans to reinstate football, rifle and bowling at UAB. As you'll recall, we announced on June 1 that we would once again be sponsoring these sports and would be taking the necessary steps toward reinstatement.
We continue to be overwhelmed at the positive commentary and interest we have seen both nationally and in the region. The response we're getting from our community has been tremendous. We continue to receive gifts and intend to report more detail on where we stand in the near future. Also, the negotiation process with our Head Football Coach Bill Clark began on June 1, the same day as our announcement, and continues to move steadily forward in a positive fashion.
I can personally say that we've both been working hard together along with our leadership team in Athletics to present a formal plan to the NCAA and to C-USA which has also been progressing nicely. This plan will ensure that we have the players' safety at the forefront, and that we have the proper amount of staff in place to coach and train them. It will also give us an opportunity to design a facility that meets our needs.
We thank everyone for giving us a championship effort during this process; we couldn't be in this position without you. I will provide further updates as information becomes available.
Go Blazers!!
Mark T. Ingram
Director of Athletics
University of Alabama at Birmingham
I thought this was a sad update so I wrote back saying:
Mark is going to have to do better than this. Even though I have absolutely no insight into the developing situation, I could have written a very similar update since it says virtually mothing.. If this was meant to appease the growing hunger among the boosters for updated information the situation, this isn’t going to fly. The natives are restless.
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2015 01:55 PM by CajunBlazer.)
|
|
07-08-2015 01:55 PM |
|
blzrclub80
Special Teams
Posts: 687
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 5
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
|
|
07-08-2015 02:24 PM |
|
WesternBlazer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 22,183
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 90
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
|
|
07-08-2015 02:25 PM |
|
blzrclub80
Special Teams
Posts: 687
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 5
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
I just got it in an e-mail today from UAB Booster in the Booster bulletin July 8, 2015 - July 21, 2015. Maybe they posted the wrong AD Ingram message. Don't hold your breath. They probably think just a message is enough to calm the restless boosters.
|
|
07-08-2015 02:46 PM |
|
CajunBlazer
1st String
Posts: 1,419
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 31
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
Me thinks it's time to bombard Mr. Ingram with emails. If this guy wants to make it in Blazerland after Pumpkin Head is gone, he had better step it up several notches. I doubt that he is savvy enough to read this board, and if he does, he probably does not understand how many boosters (the people who pay most of his salary) post here. He probably just thinks we are a bunch of vocal fans - probably among the "vocal few".
Speaking of Watts, I hope I'm wrong, but I am concerned like several others that his is the hands which are pulling Ingram's strings and it his voice we hear behind the curtain when Ingram's mouth moves. Ingram has certainly adopted communications patterns. After all, Watts didn't pick the nominating committee's fourth choice without thinking he could control him.
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2015 03:22 PM by CajunBlazer.)
|
|
07-08-2015 03:20 PM |
|
braish
All American
Posts: 2,974
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation: 44
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
(07-08-2015 03:20 PM)CajunBlazer Wrote: Me thinks it's time to bombard Mr. Ingram with emails. If this guy wants to make it in Blazerland after Pumpkin Head is gone, he had better step it up several notches. I doubt that he is savvy enough to read this board, and if he does, he probably does not understand how many boosters (the people who pay most of his salary) post here. He probably just thinks we are a bunch of vocal fans - probably among the "vocal few".
Speaking of Watts, I hope I'm wrong, but I am concerned like several others that his is the hands which are pulling Ingram's strings and it his voice we hear behind the curtain when Ingram's mouth moves. Ingram has certainly adopted communications patterns. After all, Watts didn't pick the nominating committee's fourth choice without thinking he could control him.
He was the fourth choice? Can't say I'm surprised. UAB always operates by appointing a meaningless committee that makes a recommendation which is generously ignored by the administration for a predetermined candidate. Doesn't matter if we're talking academics, student life, or athletics. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
|
|
07-09-2015 09:49 AM |
|
uabbean
1st String
Posts: 1,435
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 7
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
(07-08-2015 03:20 PM)CajunBlazer Wrote: After all, Watts didn't pick the nominating committee's fourth choice without thinking he could control him.
I am a little confused by this statement of "fourth". First at UAB on the nominating committees I was on and at other universities, the candidates are usually never officially ranked. The appointing authority receives the finalist list of qualified names to interview. Written Comments are often furnished to appointing authority. The chairmen sometimes informally orally briefs the AA
If I remember correctly the three finalists were released or leaked on this board. How did he finish fourth out of three?
(This post was last modified: 07-09-2015 10:12 AM by uabbean.)
|
|
07-09-2015 10:08 AM |
|
blzrclub80
Special Teams
Posts: 687
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 5
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
(07-09-2015 10:08 AM)uabbean Wrote: (07-08-2015 03:20 PM)CajunBlazer Wrote: After all, Watts didn't pick the nominating committee's fourth choice without thinking he could control him.
I am a little confused by this statement of "fourth". First at UAB on the nominating committees I was on and at other universities, the candidates are usually never officially ranked. The appointing authority receives the finalist list of qualified names to interview. Comments are often furnished to appointing authority. The chairmen informally orally briefs the AA
If I remember correctly the three finalists were released or leaked on this board. How did he finish fourth out of three?
AD Ingram was my 1st choice out of the three finalist "leaked". If we can get him out of the handcuffs of Watts, I believe he will be a great AD for UaB.
|
|
07-09-2015 10:11 AM |
|
notnow
1st String
Posts: 2,003
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation: 14
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
None of the above makes 4 choices.
|
|
07-09-2015 10:39 AM |
|
BlazerHam
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,025
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 5
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
Dear Boosters,
This letter has many words in it. I am proud to say that everyone knows all of these words & we expect bigger & better words in the near future.
I can say that the continued correct syntax of these words are of the utmost importance to us.
As we get more words, we will repeat those words to you, including the words also printed in this letter.
Take care & GO BLAZERS!
Mark Ingram's Wordsmith
(This post was last modified: 07-09-2015 11:27 AM by BlazerHam.)
|
|
07-09-2015 11:27 AM |
|
USAFBlazerFan
Bleeding Green & Gold since '93
Posts: 9,552
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 76
I Root For: UAB BLAZERS!!!
Location: Bellbrook, OH
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
(07-09-2015 11:27 AM)BlazerHam Wrote: Dear Boosters,
This letter has many words in it. I am proud to say that everyone knows all of these words & we expect bigger & better words in the near future.
I can say that the continued correct syntax of these words are of the utmost importance to us.
As we get more words, we will repeat those words to you, including the words also printed in this letter.
Take care & GO BLAZERS!
Mark Ingram's Wordsmith
|
|
07-09-2015 12:20 PM |
|
CajunBlazer
1st String
Posts: 1,419
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 31
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
(07-09-2015 10:08 AM)uabbean Wrote: (07-08-2015 03:20 PM)CajunBlazer Wrote: After all, Watts didn't pick the nominating committee's fourth choice without thinking he could control him.
I am a little confused by this statement of "fourth". First at UAB on the nominating committees I was on and at other universities, the candidates are usually never officially ranked. The appointing authority receives the finalist list of qualified names to interview. Written Comments are often furnished to appointing authority. The chairmen sometimes informally orally briefs the AA
If I remember correctly the three finalists were released or leaked on this board. How did he finish fourth out of three?
Okay, here is the explanation. The nominating committee picked their top three choices among all of the candidates they interviewed to recommend to Watts. (By the way those top three choices were ranked one, two and three by the committee, but I am not sure Watts was ever told that. You're right in that the committee's ranking of the top three is not usually passed on.) However, when the top three candidates were told they were still among those in the running and that they would be called in for additional interviews, the candidate who was nominating committee's first choice decided that he didn't want the job after all and took his name out of the running.
At that point the nominating committee went back and included their fourth choice, Ingram, in the three that they presented to Watts. So when Watts then chose Ingram, he chose the committee's fourth choice.
Does that make sense now?
(This post was last modified: 07-09-2015 01:36 PM by CajunBlazer.)
|
|
07-09-2015 01:32 PM |
|
kdblazer
All American
Posts: 2,573
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 32
I Root For: UAB
Location: Mtn View Forrest
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
It gives me so much comfort to know the level of knowledge we have inside our fan base. This may specific to UAB due to how the University was chartered and the forces lined against it. But for a message board, the Blazaertalk family has been on point for most university related issues whether sports related or academics.
|
|
07-09-2015 01:48 PM |
|
uabbean
1st String
Posts: 1,435
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 7
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Message to the Boosters from Mark Ingram
(07-09-2015 01:32 PM)CajunBlazer Wrote: (07-09-2015 10:08 AM)uabbean Wrote: (07-08-2015 03:20 PM)CajunBlazer Wrote: After all, Watts didn't pick the nominating committee's fourth choice without thinking he could control him.
I am a little confused by this statement of "fourth". First at UAB on the nominating committees I was on and at other universities, the candidates are usually never officially ranked. The appointing authority receives the finalist list of qualified names to interview. Written Comments are often furnished to appointing authority. The chairmen sometimes informally orally briefs the AA
If I remember correctly the three finalists were released or leaked on this board. How did he finish fourth out of three?
Okay, here is the explanation. The nominating committee picked their top three choices among all of the candidates they interviewed to recommend to Watts. (By the way those top three choices were ranked one, two and three by the committee, but I am not sure Watts was ever told that. You're right in that the committee's ranking of the top three is not usually passed on.) However, when the top three candidates were told they were still among those in the running and that they would be called in for additional interviews, the candidate who was nominating committee's first choice decided that he didn't want the job after all and took his name out of the running.
At that point the nominating committee went back and included their fourth choice, Ingram, in the three that they presented to Watts. So when Watts then chose Ingram, he chose the committee's fourth choice.
Does that make sense now?
Yes it does make sense. It is not unusual for a person to withdraw when notified they are finalist for various reasons, I even withdrew once myself when I found out the final job interview was a joke the internal candidate was getting it.
|
|
07-09-2015 05:14 PM |
|