(07-01-2015 11:44 AM)john01992 Wrote:  This has got to be the most retarded thread that I have ever read.

You're just an intolerant cis.

I seriously doubt he read the thread. He just read the title and reacted against it with the seemingly puerile unsophistication of his "argument."

The parallels with what happened historically in the last century are increasingly apparent.

An abortion tax is now legal under the SCOTUS ruling, and would at least make some people pay for their decisions, while bringing in revenue for bloated government programs that are inherently structured to be permanently insolvent.

(07-01-2015 11:47 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 11:44 AM)john01992 Wrote:  This has got to be the most retarded thread that I have ever read.

You're just an intolerant cis.

"intolerance" is creating posts about how the liberals are trying to implement nazism.

Also an abortion tax makes no fiscal sense because any tax revenue gained would pale in comparison to the increase in social cost that would result from it.

Like I said, this is a retarded thread.

(07-01-2015 12:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 11:47 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 11:44 AM)john01992 Wrote:  This has got to be the most retarded thread that I have ever read.

You're just an intolerant cis.

"intolerance" is creating posts about how the liberals are trying to implement nazism.

Also an abortion tax makes no fiscal sense because any tax revenue gained would pale in comparison to the increase in social cost that would result from it.

Like I said, this is a retarded thread.

Hmmmm...keping all those "undesireables" around would just be too expensive....like THIS, John?


This poster (from around 1938) reads: "60,000 Reichsmark is what this person suffering from a hereditary defect costs the People's community during his lifetime. Fellow citizen, that is your money too. Read '[A] New People', the monthly magazine of the Bureau for Race Politics of the NSDAP."



Same exact thing as you said, John. Just different country and different leaders. Same thing. History repeats itself in less than a century.


(P.S. also highly offended of your continued bigoted use of the "R" word on this forum, John. Very Politically Incorrect and Intolerant of you, to say the least. As the father of a special needs child, I am offended by your continued bigotry and hateful speech on this forum.)

Well I said retarded because this thread is retarded. It's funny watching someone calling others a nazi crying bigotry and intolerance.

(07-01-2015 12:26 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Well I said retarded because this thread is retarded. It's funny watching someone calling others a nazi crying bigotry and intolerance.

I didn't call you a nazi, John. I did point to the increasingly apparent parallels between how the two implemented their agendas in their societies. Perhaps you need reading glasses. Oh, I forgot, reading is not your thing.

But wait a minute, John....you are now Justifying your admitted bigotry and hate speech because you say it is funny to you?
Really? Wow.

How about we tax abortions and subsidize the cost of contraception?

(07-01-2015 01:58 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  How about we tax abortions and subsidize the cost of contraception?

Considering we're already doing the latter:

According to Planned Parenthood Federation of America‘s 2012 IRS Form 990 Planned Parenthood received an unspeakably lucrative amount of government funding from the taxpayers– to the tune of $540.6 million in FY 2012-13 – along with Planned Parenthood’s total revenue of $1.210 billion?

Which is only just one of the programs that provide contraception at taxpayer expense. Of course the ACA mandates additional spending of taxpayer funds on contraception as well, whether it is against their religious beliefs or not.

So, might as well at least tax those abortions.

Despite the tangents, the original question stands:

How much should the Abortion Tax be in your opinion?
How much is the taking of a human life worth?
How much money would you trade your life, with all its faults and imperfections, for?

(07-01-2015 01:58 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  How about we tax abortions and subsidize the cost of contraception?

Our tax money already pays for the miracle pill my man.

(07-01-2015 03:33 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 01:58 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  How about we tax abortions and subsidize the cost of contraception?

Our tax money already pays for the miracle pill my man.

Perfect... now let's tax abortions to help foot the bill.

(07-01-2015 03:35 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:33 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 01:58 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  How about we tax abortions and subsidize the cost of contraception?

Our tax money already pays for the miracle pill my man.

Perfect... now let's tax abortions to help foot the bill.

They want you to stay out of their vaginaas though.

Separation of Vag and State.

But they are perfectly okay with everyone else paying for their vaginal habits and miracle pills.

Unfortunately they refuse to consider their own cognitive dissonance.

Womyn.....we can't live without them and they can't pee standing up.

(07-01-2015 03:37 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:35 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:33 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 01:58 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  How about we tax abortions and subsidize the cost of contraception?

Our tax money already pays for the miracle pill my man.

Perfect... now let's tax abortions to help foot the bill.

They want you to stay out of their vaginaas though.

Separation of Vag and State.

But they are perfectly okay with everyone else paying for their vaginal habits and miracle pills.

Unfortunately they refuse to consider their own cognitive dissonance.

Womyn.....we can't live without them and they can't pee standing up.

I'm perfectly happy to pay for women to not get knocked up. It'll cut down the amount of abortions going around.

(07-01-2015 03:42 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:37 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:35 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:33 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 01:58 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  How about we tax abortions and subsidize the cost of contraception?

Our tax money already pays for the miracle pill my man.

Perfect... now let's tax abortions to help foot the bill.

They want you to stay out of their vaginaas though.

Separation of Vag and State.

But they are perfectly okay with everyone else paying for their vaginal habits and miracle pills.

Unfortunately they refuse to consider their own cognitive dissonance.

Womyn.....we can't live without them and they can't pee standing up.

I'm perfectly happy to pay for women to not get knocked up. It'll cut down the amount of abortions going around.

Generally speaking.

I'd be perfectly happy if womyn paid for their own habits, personally. I really do want to stay out of their vaginaas. That includes funding miracle pills that causes their vag to function improperly.

(07-01-2015 03:46 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:42 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:37 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:35 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:33 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Our tax money already pays for the miracle pill my man.

Perfect... now let's tax abortions to help foot the bill.

They want you to stay out of their vaginaas though.

Separation of Vag and State.

But they are perfectly okay with everyone else paying for their vaginal habits and miracle pills.

Unfortunately they refuse to consider their own cognitive dissonance.

Womyn.....we can't live without them and they can't pee standing up.

I'm perfectly happy to pay for women to not get knocked up. It'll cut down the amount of abortions going around.

Generally speaking.

I'd be perfectly happy if womyn paid for their own habits, personally. I really do want to stay out of their vaginaas. That includes funding miracle pills that causes their vag to function improperly.

You know, most of the people dumb enough to get knocked up can't even afford it in the first place.

(07-01-2015 03:51 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:46 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:42 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:37 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:35 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  Perfect... now let's tax abortions to help foot the bill.

They want you to stay out of their vaginaas though.

Separation of Vag and State.

But they are perfectly okay with everyone else paying for their vaginal habits and miracle pills.

Unfortunately they refuse to consider their own cognitive dissonance.

Womyn.....we can't live without them and they can't pee standing up.

I'm perfectly happy to pay for women to not get knocked up. It'll cut down the amount of abortions going around.

Generally speaking.

I'd be perfectly happy if womyn paid for their own habits, personally. I really do want to stay out of their vaginaas. That includes funding miracle pills that causes their vag to function improperly.

You know, most of the people dumb enough to get knocked up can't even afford it in the first place.

Then it sounds like if they can't afford cheap miracle pills, then they sure as **** can't afford a baby. They should consider shutting their legs.

But such would require a little self-discipline and an escape from degeneracy. Or even a boyfriend who has a job. Or a job themselves.

(07-01-2015 03:54 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:51 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:46 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:42 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 03:37 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  They want you to stay out of their vaginaas though.

Separation of Vag and State.

But they are perfectly okay with everyone else paying for their vaginal habits and miracle pills.

Unfortunately they refuse to consider their own cognitive dissonance.

Womyn.....we can't live without them and they can't pee standing up.

I'm perfectly happy to pay for women to not get knocked up. It'll cut down the amount of abortions going around.

Generally speaking.

I'd be perfectly happy if womyn paid for their own habits, personally. I really do want to stay out of their vaginaas. That includes funding miracle pills that causes their vag to function improperly.

You know, most of the people dumb enough to get knocked up can't even afford it in the first place.

Then it sounds like if they can't afford cheap miracle pills, then they sure as **** can't afford a baby. They should consider shutting their legs.

But such would require a little self-discipline and an escape from degeneracy. Or even a boyfriend who has a job. Or a job themselves.

That's the thing, these problems all roll up into one... knocked up by a deadbeat guy that can't hold a job.

ITT: People b*tching about their tax $$$ being spent on reproductive health without realizing said funding is a net revenue gain for the tax payers.

(07-01-2015 11:37 PM)john01992 Wrote:  ITT: People b*tching about their tax $$$ being spent on reproductive health without realizing said funding is a net revenue gain for the tax payers.

Going to need you to provide an unbiased link for that.


This is the Richard Simmons Spin Room and all.

(07-01-2015 11:43 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-01-2015 11:37 PM)john01992 Wrote:  ITT: People b*tching about their tax $$$ being spent on reproductive health without realizing said funding is a net revenue gain for the tax payers.

Going to need you to provide an unbiased link for that.


This is the Richard Simmons Spin Room and all.

Guttmacher Institute research finds that every public dollar invested in contraception saves $3.74 in short-term Medicaid expenditures for care related to births from unintended pregnancies. In total, services provided at publicly funded family planning centers saved $5.1 billion in 2008. (Significantly, these savings do not account for any of the broader health, social or economic benefits to women and families from contraceptive services and supplies and the ability to time, space and prepare for pregnancies.) A 2010 Brookings Institution analysis came to the same conclusion, and projected that expanding access to family planning services under Medicaid saves $4.26 for every $1 spent.

What's more expensive? Raising a kid or providing a single person contraception? It's not a hard conception to wrap your head around...unless you are a republican.