Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Historical College Football: 1946
Author Message
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,358
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #61
RE: Historical College Football: 1946
(06-16-2015 06:35 PM)Love and Honor Wrote:  
(06-16-2015 08:00 AM)loki_the_bubba Wrote:  
(06-15-2015 08:55 PM)ohio1317 Wrote:  Southwestern Conference
Rice 5-1 (co-champ)
Arkansas 5-1 (co-champ)

Bowls
Orange Bowl: #10 Rice 8-#7 Tennesse 0

Final AP Poll:
10 Rice

sigh

If I'm not mistaken, wasn't Rice the big football team in Houston back then? That was way before the Oilers and UT / A&M weren't as big then as they are now, so I guess it would make sense. That would explain why you guys chose to build a gigantic stadium for such a small school.

Rice was Houston's defacto pro team in those days during the postwar boom which were also the golden years of Rice FB.

They won the SWC 4 times during that decade from the mid 40s to late 50s capped off by the 1954 Cotton Bowl vs Alabama which featured the odd play of a Rice RB breaking free toward the endzone only to be tackled by a Tide player from off the sidelines which resulted in Rice being awarded a TD. Rice went on to win that game 28-6.
06-21-2015 09:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,881
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 898
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #62
RE: Historical College Football: 1946
(06-20-2015 11:32 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  
(06-19-2015 06:43 AM)TerryD Wrote:  
(06-18-2015 09:56 PM)gosports1 Wrote:  im going to sound like your grandparents when i say "those were the days when conferences were what they should be"

...and many independents.

What if the independents of the 80's had created a "conference" where they merely packaged their tv rights together and played each other in football (not necessarily a full conference "slate") but didn't treat it like an actual conference, unless they decided to later become one in all other non-football sports?

Say it was:
Florida State
Miami
Pittsburgh
Penn State
Notre Dame
South Carolina
Syracuse
Virginia Tech
West Virginia
Georgia Tech

ND likely would not have done it. They liked, and still like, their stand alone, over the air, NBC deal.

It might have worked with everyone else, though.
(This post was last modified: 06-21-2015 10:14 AM by TerryD.)
06-21-2015 10:13 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Marge Schott Offline
Banned

Posts: 5,989
Joined: Dec 2012
I Root For: YouAreButtHurt
Location: OnTopOfDwarfMountain
Post: #63
RE: Historical College Football: 1946
(06-21-2015 10:13 AM)TerryD Wrote:  
(06-20-2015 11:32 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  
(06-19-2015 06:43 AM)TerryD Wrote:  
(06-18-2015 09:56 PM)gosports1 Wrote:  im going to sound like your grandparents when i say "those were the days when conferences were what they should be"

...and many independents.

What if the independents of the 80's had created a "conference" where they merely packaged their tv rights together and played each other in football (not necessarily a full conference "slate") but didn't treat it like an actual conference, unless they decided to later become one in all other non-football sports?

Say it was:
Florida State
Miami
Pittsburgh
Penn State
Notre Dame
South Carolina
Syracuse
Virginia Tech
West Virginia
Georgia Tech

ND likely would not have done it. They liked, and still like, their stand alone, over the air, NBC deal.

It might have worked with everyone else, though.

When did the NBC deal start?

It's a less restrictive/inclusive version of your current ACC membership. Though I could see all you uppity Domers taking your tv money ball and going home if this were proposed in the 80s.

EDIT: I actually think it's a fairly crappy basketball league.
(This post was last modified: 06-21-2015 10:25 PM by Marge Schott.)
06-21-2015 10:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,881
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 898
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #64
RE: Historical College Football: 1946
(06-21-2015 10:24 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  
(06-21-2015 10:13 AM)TerryD Wrote:  
(06-20-2015 11:32 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  
(06-19-2015 06:43 AM)TerryD Wrote:  
(06-18-2015 09:56 PM)gosports1 Wrote:  im going to sound like your grandparents when i say "those were the days when conferences were what they should be"

...and many independents.

What if the independents of the 80's had created a "conference" where they merely packaged their tv rights together and played each other in football (not necessarily a full conference "slate") but didn't treat it like an actual conference, unless they decided to later become one in all other non-football sports?

Say it was:
Florida State
Miami
Pittsburgh
Penn State
Notre Dame
South Carolina
Syracuse
Virginia Tech
West Virginia
Georgia Tech

ND likely would not have done it. They liked, and still like, their stand alone, over the air, NBC deal.

It might have worked with everyone else, though.

When did the NBC deal start?

It's a less restrictive/inclusive version of your current ACC membership. Though I could see all you uppity Domers taking your tv money ball and going home if this were proposed in the 80s.

EDIT: I actually think it's a fairly crappy basketball league.

1991.

Yes, I think the "uppity" Domers would have done what they perceived was in their best interests instead of something less that others would have wanted them to do.
(This post was last modified: 06-22-2015 07:05 AM by TerryD.)
06-22-2015 07:05 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
exowlswimmer Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 380
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 9
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #65
RE: Historical College Football: 1946
(06-21-2015 09:30 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  
(06-16-2015 06:35 PM)Love and Honor Wrote:  
(06-16-2015 08:00 AM)loki_the_bubba Wrote:  
(06-15-2015 08:55 PM)ohio1317 Wrote:  Southwestern Conference
Rice 5-1 (co-champ)
Arkansas 5-1 (co-champ)

Bowls
Orange Bowl: #10 Rice 8-#7 Tennesse 0

Final AP Poll:
10 Rice

sigh

If I'm not mistaken, wasn't Rice the big football team in Houston back then? That was way before the Oilers and UT / A&M weren't as big then as they are now, so I guess it would make sense. That would explain why you guys chose to build a gigantic stadium for such a small school.

Rice was Houston's defacto pro team in those days during the postwar boom which were also the golden years of Rice FB.

They won the SWC 4 times during that decade from the mid 40s to late 50s capped off by the 1954 Cotton Bowl vs Alabama which featured the odd play of a Rice RB breaking free toward the endzone only to be tackled by a Tide player from off the sidelines which resulted in Rice being awarded a TD. Rice went on to win that game 28-6.

$EC and my tradition bound Aggies; cement the state of Texas with a travel partner worthy of your AAU membership. Everyone states TAMU already owns Houston, but so does Tennessee own Nashville. Rice got dealt a bad hand when The SWC imploded but is doing things smart to get invited back to the big kids table. SEC has raised their academic bar and many Owls are tiring of singing the Whorns praises while Texas singlehandedly destroys their conference for their own benefit. A second academic private school for the SEC corrects earlier errors that drove Tulane and public ivy Gt from their ranks. Plus Houston then becomes a site that SEC alums can travel to and see their team while waiting to get on the priority list for season tickets at Baton Rouge, Gainsville or 'you fill in the blank.'
06-23-2015 04:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.