bullet
Legend
Posts: 66,818
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3315
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
|
RE: Outside The Lines looks at non-prosecution of accused college athletes
(06-14-2015 04:17 PM)JRsec Wrote: (06-14-2015 04:03 PM)Wedge Wrote: (06-14-2015 04:01 PM)JRsec Wrote: (06-14-2015 03:34 PM)Wedge Wrote: Lawyers, status, public backlash aid college athletes accused of crimes
Quote:As a University of Florida running back, Chris Rainey was named a suspect in five crimes in Gainesville. He faced charges once.
Rainey's experience as a star athlete accused of criminal activity -- stalking, fighting, injuring someone with fireworks -- but ending up with a mostly clean record is not uncommon: From 2009 to 2014, male basketball and football players at the University of Florida and Florida State University avoided criminal charges or prosecution on average two-thirds of the time when named as suspects in police documents, a result far exceeding that of non-athlete males in the same age range, an Outside the Lines investigation has found.
Last fall, to determine how often crimes involving college athletes are prosecuted and what factors influence them, Outside the Lines requested police reports involving all football and men's basketball players on rosters from 2009 to 2014 from campus and city police departments covering 10 major programs: Auburn, Florida, Florida State, Michigan State, Missouri, Notre Dame, Oklahoma State, Oregon State, Texas A&M and Wisconsin. Some police departments withheld records citing state disclosure laws. (ESPN sued the University of Notre Dame and Michigan State University for not releasing material; both cases are pending on appeal.) And not all information was uniform among jurisdictions.
I wonder why Alabama, Texas, Oklahoma, Penn State, Michigan and Ohio State were excluded along with all of the programs of the ACC with the exception of Notre Dame? I know of 6 programs in that grouping I listed that would have had some explaining to do.
Florida State is still in the ACC, notwithstanding the "projections" of many posters on this message board.
They were so obvious after the Winston mess I didn't even consider them as being out of place here. The whole Research Triangle would have been easy to research because of the limited number of police departments involved. Clemson, Miami (hello), and Louisville (with their recent penchant for taking discipline problems from other schools) would all have been in order.
What I sniff here is ESPN's pandering to their sweethearts: Alabama, Texas, Kansas, Oregon, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State while hitting on virtually all of their rivals. Auburn, A&M, Oklahoma State, Michigan State, Oregon State, Wisconsin, Missouri, and I would classify N.D. & F.S.U. as being a rival to many things in Raleigh / Durham / Chapel Hill. Really only Florida stands alone as one who has been a darling, but then the Hernandez stench attaches itself to the Gators, but remarkably not to his former head coach, Urban Meyer.
Oklahoma St., Notre Dame, Missouri and FSU have all had high profile incidents. Pretty obvious why they were included. And of course, Auburn and A&M have always been high on the major violation list. And with Cam Newton, Nick Marshall and Johnny Manziel they made even more obvious targets. 2 people who got kicked out of other programs and 1 person who always made a lot of negative news.
Florida is known for being pretty lenient on their drug policy.
Not sure why Oregon St., Michigan St. and Wisconsin made the list, but they may have had some high profile incidents I hadn't heard about.
|
|