Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
Author Message
PirateMarv Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
Post: #101
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
The Sun Belt should hope that Missouri State and Illinois State are ready to make a jump. Those would be decent additions.
06-11-2015 12:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DavidSt Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,066
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 781
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #102
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
Who is ready now for FBS?
North Dakota State
Eastern Washington
Montana
Montana State (they have the stadium big enough already for 15,000, but too chicken to move)
Liberty
Alabama State
Jacksonville State
Florida A&M
Delaware
James Madison
Northern Iowa
Youngstown State
06-12-2015 05:39 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Georgia_Power_Company Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,481
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 122
I Root For: GA Southern
Location: Statesboro GA
Post: #103
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-12-2015 05:39 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  Who is ready now for FBS?
North Dakota State
Eastern Washington
Montana
Montana State (they have the stadium big enough already for 15,000, but too chicken to move)
Liberty
Alabama State
Jacksonville State
Florida A&M
Delaware
James Madison
Northern Iowa
Youngstown State

E. Kentucky - wants FBS and has a 20,000 seat stadium currently undergoing renovations

Missouri St - has the budget and recently updated stadium to 17,500 seats.
06-12-2015 07:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cleburneslim Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,551
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 25
I Root For: jax state
Location:
Post: #104
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
Thats enough for a whole new conference.
06-12-2015 06:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billybobby777 Offline
The REAL BillyBobby
*

Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #105
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-11-2015 06:14 AM)Seminole Indian Wrote:  
(06-11-2015 03:05 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  
(06-10-2015 01:52 PM)Eagleditka Wrote:  
(06-03-2015 12:16 PM)chargeradio Wrote:  I don't see a reason to kick out Idaho unless if there's another western addition in football (or all sports). If UT-Arlington announces it is starting football, or if Missouri State wants to join, then you give Idaho the boot. Divisions matter in football, and Arkansas State, Louisiana, and ULM all belong in the West.

I'm with you. Kicking Idaho out seems to be the conventional wisdom on the Sun Belt message board. I'd much rather give NMSU full membership, extend Idaho in football only to 2020, add UMass to a similar deal, and wait until EKU/Coastal/MoSt are more ready. Clean 12/12 setup, divisions and a championship game as early as 2016. No waiting on FCS move ups. Access to Gillette Stadium for TV games. You add more value to the conference by adding a championship game and the Massachusetts media market, then you do subtracting Idaho and going to 10 in football.

I would kick out New Mexico State as well. Lamar's football have improved. They went 8-4 last and just missed out a spot in the playoffs. Lamar have been recruiting players that they will be playing in the FBS. They are aggressive and much more ready than Missouri State, Eastern Kentucky and Coastal Carolina. Lamar could be the 12th team right now which means one of the Louisiana or Arkansas State move to the east. Bring North Dakota State in as football only to help their football be more attractive for another conference. We have schools that are ready for FBS, but are in places where the Sun Belt have schools are at.

It is obvious you should have been in bed and sleeping, when you made this post.

I thought it was joke. Maybe your right and he made an ambian post.
06-12-2015 06:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ARSTATEFAN1986 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,038
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 12
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #106
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-12-2015 06:24 PM)cleburneslim Wrote:  Thats enough for a whole new conference.

Liberty
Alabama State
Jacksonville State
Florida A&M
Delaware
James Madison
Army
Youngstown State
06-12-2015 09:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cleburneslim Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,551
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 25
I Root For: jax state
Location:
Post: #107
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
Eku or ccu, possibly shsu , lamar, maybe utc
06-12-2015 09:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HawaiiMongoose Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,738
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 446
I Root For: Hawaii
Location: Honolulu
Post: #108
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
I predicted EKU 15 months ago. I'm still leaning that way, although there's a lot to like about CCU.

A poster on the EKU board claims to have been "tipped off" that EKU is expecting some kind of answer from the Sun Belt by June 22nd.

http://www.maroon-nation.com/forum/viewt...f=4&t=2003
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2015 02:55 AM by HawaiiMongoose.)
06-13-2015 02:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BirdstheWord Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 252
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 3
I Root For: ISU
Location:
Post: #109
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-11-2015 12:15 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  The Sun Belt should hope that Missouri State and Illinois State are ready to make a jump. Those would be decent additions.

I think the Sun Belt Conference asked around to a lot of the Missouri Valley teams and I know Illinois State said no.
06-13-2015 02:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Savacool Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,438
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: -82
I Root For: Tulane
Location:
Post: #110
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
The Sunbelt's best teams have been cleaned out by CUSA. What lower conferences do they raid?
06-13-2015 07:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dman Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 514
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 23
I Root For: APP STATE
Location:
Post: #111
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-13-2015 07:30 AM)Savacool Wrote:  The Sunbelt's best teams have been cleaned out by CUSA. What lower conferences do they raid?

LOL
06-13-2015 07:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Georgia_Power_Company Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,481
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 122
I Root For: GA Southern
Location: Statesboro GA
Post: #112
Re: RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-13-2015 07:30 AM)Savacool Wrote:  The Sunbelt's best teams have been cleaned out by CUSA. What lower conferences do they raid?

Yeah we are really missing the F_U twins. lmao

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App
06-13-2015 07:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
arkstfan Away
Sorry folks
*

Posts: 25,846
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 986
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
Post: #113
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-13-2015 07:30 AM)Savacool Wrote:  The Sunbelt's best teams have been cleaned out by CUSA. What lower conferences do they raid?
Last ten Sun Belt champions
2005: AState, Louisiana, ULM
2006: Troy, MTSU
2007: Troy, FAU
2008: Troy
2009: Troy
2010: Troy, FIU
2011: AState
2012: AState
2013: AState, Louisiana
2014: Georgia Southern

[Image: 4a1e97dc61ad8100ecb31ff98f0b3559.jpg]
06-13-2015 01:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DavidSt Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,066
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 781
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #114
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-12-2015 06:29 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(06-11-2015 06:14 AM)Seminole Indian Wrote:  
(06-11-2015 03:05 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  
(06-10-2015 01:52 PM)Eagleditka Wrote:  
(06-03-2015 12:16 PM)chargeradio Wrote:  I don't see a reason to kick out Idaho unless if there's another western addition in football (or all sports). If UT-Arlington announces it is starting football, or if Missouri State wants to join, then you give Idaho the boot. Divisions matter in football, and Arkansas State, Louisiana, and ULM all belong in the West.

I'm with you. Kicking Idaho out seems to be the conventional wisdom on the Sun Belt message board. I'd much rather give NMSU full membership, extend Idaho in football only to 2020, add UMass to a similar deal, and wait until EKU/Coastal/MoSt are more ready. Clean 12/12 setup, divisions and a championship game as early as 2016. No waiting on FCS move ups. Access to Gillette Stadium for TV games. You add more value to the conference by adding a championship game and the Massachusetts media market, then you do subtracting Idaho and going to 10 in football.

I would kick out New Mexico State as well. Lamar's football have improved. They went 8-4 last and just missed out a spot in the playoffs. Lamar have been recruiting players that they will be playing in the FBS. They are aggressive and much more ready than Missouri State, Eastern Kentucky and Coastal Carolina. Lamar could be the 12th team right now which means one of the Louisiana or Arkansas State move to the east. Bring North Dakota State in as football only to help their football be more attractive for another conference. We have schools that are ready for FBS, but are in places where the Sun Belt have schools are at.

It is obvious you should have been in bed and sleeping, when you made this post.

I thought it was joke. Maybe your right and he made an ambian post.


Not a joke. Look how spread out the Sun Belt would be if you add New Mexico State for all sports? They be better off in a more travel friendly conference with Idaho in the west. They should try and get BYU and the three could try to find a way to revive WAC football.
06-13-2015 01:56 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NotANewbie Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 565
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 42
I Root For: Tennesse, NMSU
Location:
Post: #115
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-13-2015 01:56 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  
(06-12-2015 06:29 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(06-11-2015 06:14 AM)Seminole Indian Wrote:  
(06-11-2015 03:05 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  
(06-10-2015 01:52 PM)Eagleditka Wrote:  I'm with you. Kicking Idaho out seems to be the conventional wisdom on the Sun Belt message board. I'd much rather give NMSU full membership, extend Idaho in football only to 2020, add UMass to a similar deal, and wait until EKU/Coastal/MoSt are more ready. Clean 12/12 setup, divisions and a championship game as early as 2016. No waiting on FCS move ups. Access to Gillette Stadium for TV games. You add more value to the conference by adding a championship game and the Massachusetts media market, then you do subtracting Idaho and going to 10 in football.

I would kick out New Mexico State as well. Lamar's football have improved. They went 8-4 last and just missed out a spot in the playoffs. Lamar have been recruiting players that they will be playing in the FBS. They are aggressive and much more ready than Missouri State, Eastern Kentucky and Coastal Carolina. Lamar could be the 12th team right now which means one of the Louisiana or Arkansas State move to the east. Bring North Dakota State in as football only to help their football be more attractive for another conference. We have schools that are ready for FBS, but are in places where the Sun Belt have schools are at.

It is obvious you should have been in bed and sleeping, when you made this post.

I thought it was joke. Maybe your right and he made an ambian post.


Not a joke. Look how spread out the Sun Belt would be if you add New Mexico State for all sports? They be better off in a more travel friendly conference with Idaho in the west. They should try and get BYU and the three could try to find a way to revive WAC football.


Have you been to Colorado lately? You must have been smokin somethin powerful!
06-13-2015 04:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kittonhead Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,000
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 122
I Root For: Beat Matisse
Location:
Post: #116
RE: Sun Belt to evaluate expansion options within the next 30-45 days
(06-13-2015 02:51 AM)HawaiiMongoose Wrote:  I predicted EKU 15 months ago. I'm still leaning that way, although there's a lot to like about CCU.

A poster on the EKU board claims to have been "tipped off" that EKU is expecting some kind of answer from the Sun Belt by June 22nd.

http://www.maroon-nation.com/forum/viewt...f=4&t=2003

The deadline to begin FBS reclassification for 2016 just passed on June 1st.

I like Coastal here because of the new stadium and South Carolina location.

CUSA has interest in Texas State, AState and ULL. It would make sense to shift the SBC further East where it could become more attractive for schools like JMU and Delaware.
06-13-2015 05:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.