Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
Author Message
XLance Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,231
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 762
I Root For: Carolina
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #41
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
(05-11-2015 05:42 AM)ren.hoek Wrote:  Only problem with 3-3-5 is that some schools will have a big scheduling advantage by virtue if their 3 permanent rivals. Duke might end up with UNC, WF, and UVa, which is a far cry from Clemson getting FSU, NCSU and GT or FSU getting Clemson, Miami and Louisville. It really brings me back to the fact that we need 16 with dynamic divisions to fix the problem.

?
Dook will end up with Georgia Tech as one of their three permanents. The Yellow Jackets and the Dookies have played football every year since 1933.
You can't fix divisions or a 3-3-5 alignment until you learn, understand and are sensitive to the history of the conference and it's teams.
05-11-2015 07:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fburghokie Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 177
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 6
I Root For: Va tech
Location:
Post: #42
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
Acc can say ok we bring it to NBC and they lose the entire Acc product line which Includes all basketball from the preeminent basketball league in college sports -Acc says take it to court and don't think ESPN wants that .

(05-10-2015 05:08 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  ESPN may give the ACC an ultimatum: fix the scheduling model or forget about an ACC Cable Network. No way do they want more UVa vs. Ga Tech and Wake vs. Syracuse games at the expense of FSU vs GT or even Wake vs. UNC. ESPN wants good match-ups, and that means rivalries on the FIELD - not in the classroom. I'm sure they couldn't care less about "institutional fit" when it comes to football - they just want good games!
05-11-2015 07:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Marge Schott Offline
Banned

Posts: 5,989
Joined: Dec 2012
I Root For: YouAreButtHurt
Location: OnTopOfDwarfMountain
Post: #43
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
(05-11-2015 07:38 AM)Fburghokie Wrote:  Acc can say ok we bring it to NBC and they lose the entire Acc product line which Includes all basketball from the preeminent basketball league in college sports -Acc says take it to court and don't think ESPN wants that .

(05-10-2015 05:08 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  ESPN may give the ACC an ultimatum: fix the scheduling model or forget about an ACC Cable Network. No way do they want more UVa vs. Ga Tech and Wake vs. Syracuse games at the expense of FSU vs GT or even Wake vs. UNC. ESPN wants good match-ups, and that means rivalries on the FIELD - not in the classroom. I'm sure they couldn't care less about "institutional fit" when it comes to football - they just want good games!

Not sure you thought that through...?
05-11-2015 07:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EvilVodka Offline
stuff

Posts: 3,585
Joined: Jan 2014
I Root For: FSU LSU
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #44
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
Add two teams (Houston and Rice) and create 4 pods, doing away with divisions and just having the best 2 teams in the championship
05-11-2015 11:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hokie Mark Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,720
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 1392
I Root For: VT, ACC teams
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #45
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
(05-11-2015 11:10 AM)EvilVodka Wrote:  Add two teams (Houston and Rice) and create 4 pods, doing away with divisions and just having the best 2 teams in the championship

If the ACC ever adds 2 G5 teams from the Gulf Coast area, they would have to be from 2 different states most likely - like Houston and Tulane.
05-11-2015 01:29 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ken d Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,331
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 1211
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #46
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
(05-11-2015 01:29 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  
(05-11-2015 11:10 AM)EvilVodka Wrote:  Add two teams (Houston and Rice) and create 4 pods, doing away with divisions and just having the best 2 teams in the championship

If the ACC ever adds 2 G5 teams from the Gulf Coast area, they would have to be from 2 different states most likely - like Houston and Tulane.

Sure. If we've learned anything about college football it's that folks in Texas and Louisiana really crave more opponents like BC, Syracuse, Pitt, Wake Forest, etc. 07-coffee3
05-11-2015 01:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hokie Mark Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,720
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 1392
I Root For: VT, ACC teams
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #47
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
(05-11-2015 01:40 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(05-11-2015 01:29 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  
(05-11-2015 11:10 AM)EvilVodka Wrote:  Add two teams (Houston and Rice) and create 4 pods, doing away with divisions and just having the best 2 teams in the championship

If the ACC ever adds 2 G5 teams from the Gulf Coast area, they would have to be from 2 different states most likely - like Houston and Tulane.

Sure. If we've learned anything about college football it's that folks in Texas and Louisiana really crave more opponents like BC, Syracuse, Pitt, Wake Forest, etc. 07-coffee3

Just so we are clear, I do NOT think those are the best additions!
05-11-2015 02:13 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cuseroc Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 15,262
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 546
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: Rochester/Sarasota

Donators
Post: #48
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
(05-11-2015 01:40 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(05-11-2015 01:29 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  
(05-11-2015 11:10 AM)EvilVodka Wrote:  Add two teams (Houston and Rice) and create 4 pods, doing away with divisions and just having the best 2 teams in the championship

If the ACC ever adds 2 G5 teams from the Gulf Coast area, they would have to be from 2 different states most likely - like Houston and Tulane.

Sure. If we've learned anything about college football it's that folks in Texas and Louisiana really crave more opponents like BC, Syracuse, Pitt, Wake Forest, etc. 07-coffee3

As long as they would be invited to a P5 Conference, I dont think a team like Houston or Rice would really care about playing the likes of BC, Cuse, Wake or Pitt. That being said, Houston would never be in the Acc as we know it today.
(This post was last modified: 05-11-2015 02:15 PM by cuseroc.)
05-11-2015 02:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Marge Schott Offline
Banned

Posts: 5,989
Joined: Dec 2012
I Root For: YouAreButtHurt
Location: OnTopOfDwarfMountain
Post: #49
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
So basically no one likes the Houston/Rice expansion proposal? Seems like it's approval rating is about the same as it was a month ago: pretty low.
(This post was last modified: 05-11-2015 07:18 PM by Marge Schott.)
05-11-2015 05:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RedGrad Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 100
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
Post: #50
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
I don't think the ACC ever expands into TX unless some earth shattering break in the P5 caused the lid to pop off the Big12. Even then your talking vast travel distances beyond what we're already dealing with. If it ever did happen it's not gonna be for Houston and Rice. I just don't see Florida State and Notre Dame heading out to rice to compete in sports. Ever. I think this is an Eastern league. After reading about the WVU travel grind I'm good with it.
05-11-2015 07:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cuseroc Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 15,262
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 546
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: Rochester/Sarasota

Donators
Post: #51
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
(05-11-2015 05:08 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  So basically no one likes the Houston/Rice expansion proposal? Seems like it's approval rating is about the same as it was a month ago: pretty low.

Houston in the ACC is a silly idea at best. Rice is not much better.
05-11-2015 07:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Marge Schott Offline
Banned

Posts: 5,989
Joined: Dec 2012
I Root For: YouAreButtHurt
Location: OnTopOfDwarfMountain
Post: #52
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
(05-11-2015 07:51 PM)cuseroc Wrote:  
(05-11-2015 05:08 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  So basically no one likes the Houston/Rice expansion proposal? Seems like it's approval rating is about the same as it was a month ago: pretty low.

Houston in the ACC is a silly idea at best. Rice is not much better.

I agree the whole idea is silly, but you think Houston is a worse addition than Rice?
05-11-2015 08:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ragu Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,834
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 605
I Root For: FAU/FSU
Location:
Post: #53
ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
You guys realize that both Houston and rice are in the same city right? Dumb idea anyways but that makes it even more ridiculous
05-11-2015 09:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,637
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1326
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #54
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
Houston/Rice is ridiculous...if UT ever comes (which is a pipe-dream IMHO) they will bring along a few teams like OU/Baylor/TCU
(This post was last modified: 05-11-2015 09:27 PM by TexanMark.)
05-11-2015 09:27 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RedGrad Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 100
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
Post: #55
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
There's nothing worse than going to Houston to play sports. Long trip, no fans - empty stadium, and what's worse they always have surprising talent. They can beat you if you don't play motivated football. So your team gets lulled to sleep and then is forced to fight through a surprisingly tough situation. Another city school with not quite all the ingredients to put it together. Huge city with lots and lots of football talent. They also had a nice era of power basketball teams. Best money could buy. Rice is just not even worth the discussion.
05-11-2015 09:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cuseroc Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 15,262
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 546
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: Rochester/Sarasota

Donators
Post: #56
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
(05-11-2015 08:59 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  
(05-11-2015 07:51 PM)cuseroc Wrote:  
(05-11-2015 05:08 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  So basically no one likes the Houston/Rice expansion proposal? Seems like it's approval rating is about the same as it was a month ago: pretty low.

Houston in the ACC is a silly idea at best. Rice is not much better.

I agree the whole idea is silly, but you think Houston is a worse addition than Rice?

They may be equally bad for the Acc. Rice has great academics, terrible revenue sports, while Houston has decent to good revenue sports and bad academics. The city of Houston would be a plus but does anyone in Houston care about either team? Neither would pay their way in the Acc. My opinion, for what its worth.
05-11-2015 10:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Marge Schott Offline
Banned

Posts: 5,989
Joined: Dec 2012
I Root For: YouAreButtHurt
Location: OnTopOfDwarfMountain
Post: #57
RE: ACC should consider changes at spring meetings
Houston is the better addition than Rice. That's not even debatable. And neither are good additions. That's also not debatable. The ACC will never add both, together. Again, that's not debatable.

I only asked because someone keeps trying to push that idea and wouldn't listen to my previous comments attesting to the poor decision that would be. And clearly everyone but this one person thinks it's a poor decision. And it's not debatable.
05-11-2015 10:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.