No reason to suspect he was mentally incompetent.

Quote:San Bernardino County judge has expressed doubt about the mental competence of a Fontana man accused of a hate crime in the fatal baseball-bat beating of a 54-year-old grandfather in Rialto this week.

Police say Jeremiah Bell, 22, went out Sunday looking to attack “anybody who wasn’t black.” On a residential street just a short walk from his apartment, they say, Bell, who is black, found Armando Barron, who is Latino, walking home from the grocery store, and attacked him about 2:30 p.m.

Barron died of his injuries at Arrowhead Regional Medical Center on Thursday, the same day that Bell appeared in court to be arraigned on attempted murder charges with an enhancement for use of a deadly weapon. He was also charged with a hate crime.

During the hearing, Superior Court Judge Jon D. Ferguson ordered the proceedings delayed until a court-appointed psychiatrist could evaluate Bell, court minutes show. He had pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors plan to file murder charges against Bell once reports confirming Barron’s death are submitted, a district attorney’s spokesman said.

Bell is due back in court June 9.

Rialto Police Det. Sgt. Paul Stella said he had no information indicating Bell may have been mentally incompetent.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me...story.html

This isn't Baltimore.

(05-03-2015 05:04 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  This isn't Baltimore.

Wait, did I miss the new AUP saying all threads have to involve events in Baltmore?

(05-03-2015 05:08 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:04 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  This isn't Baltimore.

Wait, did I miss the new AUP saying all threads have to involve events in Baltmore?

No. It's just when I post articles like this they're considered spam and the Mods remove them.

Wait the black guy was charged with hate crime for killing a white guy???? The right B****ed extensively about how blacks were immune from hate crimes during the knockout game fiasco. Glad to see that myth being put to an end by ERC of all people.

(05-03-2015 05:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Wait the black guy was charged with hate crime for killing a white guy???? The right B****ed extensively about how blacks were immune from hate crimes during the knockout game fiasco. Glad to see that myth being put to an end by ERC of all people.

Just wait till his psych report comes back as unfit for trial.

One would think you would know that this man being charged with a hate crime has nothing to do with virtually every black person not being charged with a hate crime during the knockout game ordeal when they were clearly targeting white people.

(05-03-2015 05:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Wait the black guy was charged with hate crime for killing a white guy???? The right B****ed extensively about how blacks were immune from hate crimes during the knockout game fiasco. Glad to see that myth being put to an end by ERC of all people.

Just wait till his psych report comes back as unfit for trial.

One would think you would know that this man being charged with a hate crime has nothing to do with virtually every black person not being charged with a hate crime during the knockout game ordeal when they were clearly targeting white people.

:banghead:we went over this a long time ago. You can't charge someone based on assumptions. There are things called evidence and proof and facts. make no mistake about it, if there is clear evidence that it was racially motivated, they will be charged.

"he's black and the victim was white" simply doesn't cut it.

(05-03-2015 05:24 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:08 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:04 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  This isn't Baltimore.

Wait, did I miss the new AUP saying all threads have to involve events in Baltmore?

No. It's just when I post articles like this they're considered spam and the Mods remove them.

No they haven't.

(05-03-2015 05:48 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Wait the black guy was charged with hate crime for killing a white guy???? The right B****ed extensively about how blacks were immune from hate crimes during the knockout game fiasco. Glad to see that myth being put to an end by ERC of all people.

Just wait till his psych report comes back as unfit for trial.

One would think you would know that this man being charged with a hate crime has nothing to do with virtually every black person not being charged with a hate crime during the knockout game ordeal when they were clearly targeting white people.

:banghead:we went over this a long time ago. You can't charge someone based on assumptions. There are things called evidence and proof and facts. make no mistake about it, if there is clear evidence that it was racially motivated, they will be charged.

"he's black and the victim was white" simply doesn't cut it.

Smfh...


You're an idiot of the first order.

(05-03-2015 07:02 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:48 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Wait the black guy was charged with hate crime for killing a white guy???? The right B****ed extensively about how blacks were immune from hate crimes during the knockout game fiasco. Glad to see that myth being put to an end by ERC of all people.

Just wait till his psych report comes back as unfit for trial.

One would think you would know that this man being charged with a hate crime has nothing to do with virtually every black person not being charged with a hate crime during the knockout game ordeal when they were clearly targeting white people.

:banghead:we went over this a long time ago. You can't charge someone based on assumptions. There are things called evidence and proof and facts. make no mistake about it, if there is clear evidence that it was racially motivated, they will be charged.

"he's black and the victim was white" simply doesn't cut it.

Smfh...


You're an idiot of the first order.

Compelling argument.

(05-03-2015 07:00 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:24 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:08 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:04 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  This isn't Baltimore.

Wait, did I miss the new AUP saying all threads have to involve events in Baltmore?

No. It's just when I post articles like this they're considered spam and the Mods remove them.

No they haven't.

Uh yes. They have.

(05-03-2015 07:21 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 07:02 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:48 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Wait the black guy was charged with hate crime for killing a white guy???? The right B****ed extensively about how blacks were immune from hate crimes during the knockout game fiasco. Glad to see that myth being put to an end by ERC of all people.

Just wait till his psych report comes back as unfit for trial.

One would think you would know that this man being charged with a hate crime has nothing to do with virtually every black person not being charged with a hate crime during the knockout game ordeal when they were clearly targeting white people.

:banghead:we went over this a long time ago. You can't charge someone based on assumptions. There are things called evidence and proof and facts. make no mistake about it, if there is clear evidence that it was racially motivated, they will be charged.

"he's black and the victim was white" simply doesn't cut it.

Smfh...


You're an idiot of the first order.

Compelling argument.

Succinct and to the point.

(05-03-2015 07:32 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 07:00 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:24 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:08 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:04 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  This isn't Baltimore.

Wait, did I miss the new AUP saying all threads have to involve events in Baltmore?

No. It's just when I post articles like this they're considered spam and the Mods remove them.

No they haven't.

Uh yes. They have.

Point to one.

(05-03-2015 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 07:32 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 07:00 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:24 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:08 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  Wait, did I miss the new AUP saying all threads have to involve events in Baltmore?

No. It's just when I post articles like this they're considered spam and the Mods remove them.

No they haven't.

Uh yes. They have.

Point to one.

You know that isn't possible because they were deleted. However, Mach and I have threads that have been closed that are still available to view.

Fcking animal. I hope he suffers every day of the rest of his miserable life.

Kill him now...No Justice,..No Peace! Riot and burn.

Oh yes, I forgot, real property owners do not destroy their own stuff. Only the poor, uneducated inner city folks that live in government housing does this!

Now this is the time for the reasoning that the facts are what they are and there really is no need for a lengthy trial. Sounds like they know:

Who the perp is. What he did. End of story,,,, get a rope!

(05-03-2015 05:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Wait the black guy was charged with hate crime for killing a white guy???? The right B****ed extensively about how blacks were immune from hate crimes during the knockout game fiasco. Glad to see that myth being put to an end by ERC of all people.

I think the victim could be Latino. He has a Latino-sounding name. It's hard to tell with the glasses and that dark picture.

Execute the Thug, hate crimes deserve a stronger punishment.

(05-03-2015 07:21 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 07:02 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:48 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(05-03-2015 05:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Wait the black guy was charged with hate crime for killing a white guy???? The right B****ed extensively about how blacks were immune from hate crimes during the knockout game fiasco. Glad to see that myth being put to an end by ERC of all people.

Just wait till his psych report comes back as unfit for trial.

One would think you would know that this man being charged with a hate crime has nothing to do with virtually every black person not being charged with a hate crime during the knockout game ordeal when they were clearly targeting white people.

:banghead:we went over this a long time ago. You can't charge someone based on assumptions. There are things called evidence and proof and facts. make no mistake about it, if there is clear evidence that it was racially motivated, they will be charged.

"he's black and the victim was white" simply doesn't cut it.

Smfh...


You're an idiot of the first order.

Compelling argument.

Such a compelling counter-argument.

Take the "suspect" out back, shoot him, and dump the body in the river.

No one will ever miss him.