NoDak
Jersey Retired
Posts: 6,958
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 105
I Root For: UND
Location:
|
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
(05-22-2015 07:22 PM)RaiderRed Wrote: (05-22-2015 05:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: The only other way I can see to help the P12N profits is expansion. Get more people in the footprint. The P12N would need to find a way to get into Texas. That's the biggest untapped state in the west for the conference. Adding additional schools is existing Pac12 states or low population untapped western states probably won't help much. Any expansion that doesn't generate interest/viewership in Texas is probably a waste of time.
In Texas, where do they get those viewers? Pac 12 won't take TCU or Baylor and A&M found a home in the SEC.
That leaves Texas, Texas Tech and Houston. 2 of those schools put 60K + in the seats with fans across the state.
Simple. SMU and Houston. Two major media markets.
|
|
05-22-2015 09:06 PM |
|
RaiderRed
Banned
Posts: 794
Joined: Nov 2014
I Root For: P5
Location:
|
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
(05-22-2015 09:06 PM)NoDak Wrote: (05-22-2015 07:22 PM)RaiderRed Wrote: (05-22-2015 05:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: The only other way I can see to help the P12N profits is expansion. Get more people in the footprint. The P12N would need to find a way to get into Texas. That's the biggest untapped state in the west for the conference. Adding additional schools is existing Pac12 states or low population untapped western states probably won't help much. Any expansion that doesn't generate interest/viewership in Texas is probably a waste of time.
In Texas, where do they get those viewers? Pac 12 won't take TCU or Baylor and A&M found a home in the SEC.
That leaves Texas, Texas Tech and Houston. 2 of those schools put 60K + in the seats with fans across the state.
Simple. SMU and Houston. Two major media markets.
BYU has a major media market as well and they have been told NO numerous times. I have a feeling SMU will find the same situation despite the glaring difference in support.
Larry Scott has options, no doubt about it. I wonder why he and the PAC 12 presidents are standing still?
|
|
05-22-2015 10:16 PM |
|
chargeradio
Vamos Morados
Posts: 7,483
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 122
I Root For: ALA, KY, USA
Location: Louisville, KY
|
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
The Pac 10 should have merged with what was left of the SWC in the 1990s. Colorado and Utah would have then been in the middle of the Pac 14 footprint, so Colorado likely leaves the Big 8 and Utah likely leaves the WAC, and both would join the Pac 16 in 1996.
Even if limited to two divisions, giving both divisions access to California and Texas would have allowed the Pac 16 maximum exposure for both recruiting and television. The permanent crossover games could have been setup to preserve rivalries for the California schools and Texas schools, and then the Northwest and Mountain schools could have been shuffled accordingly. Of course the Pac 16 could have pushed for championship game deregulation much sooner, which would have allowed the use of geographically-friendly quads. Both Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston would have been split Pac 16/Big 12 markets.
If Texas isn't coming, Baylor or North Texas is about is as close as the Pac 12 could get to doubling down in DFW. Of course now that Austin itself has grown to 912,000 people, it makes landing the Longhorns that much more lucrative.
|
|
05-24-2015 09:59 PM |
|
NestaKnight1
1st String
Posts: 1,844
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 99
I Root For: UCF
Location:
|
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
(05-22-2015 07:22 PM)RaiderRed Wrote: (05-22-2015 05:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: The only other way I can see to help the P12N profits is expansion. Get more people in the footprint. The P12N would need to find a way to get into Texas. That's the biggest untapped state in the west for the conference. Adding additional schools is existing Pac12 states or low population untapped western states probably won't help much. Any expansion that doesn't generate interest/viewership in Texas is probably a waste of time.
In Texas, where do they get those viewers? Pac 12 won't take TCU or Baylor and A&M found a home in the SEC.
That leaves Texas, Texas Tech and Houston. 2 of those schools put 60K + in the seats with fans across the state.
True, but they might want to take a look at Texas Tech anyway.
|
|
05-25-2015 09:10 AM |
|
bluesox
Heisman
Posts: 5,304
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 84
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
They should have never turned down OU and OK state to jump to 14. Team 15 is Texas Tech and team 16 is either Texas, Kansas, New mexico or Houston…assuming the pac 12 rules out private religious school's. I don't really see them making a move without taking any big 12 school's so it might be awhile.
|
|
05-25-2015 09:32 AM |
|