Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
Author Message
NoDak Offline
Jersey Retired
Jersey Retired

Posts: 6,958
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 105
I Root For: UND
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
(05-22-2015 07:22 PM)RaiderRed Wrote:  
(05-22-2015 05:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  The only other way I can see to help the P12N profits is expansion. Get more people in the footprint. The P12N would need to find a way to get into Texas. That's the biggest untapped state in the west for the conference. Adding additional schools is existing Pac12 states or low population untapped western states probably won't help much. Any expansion that doesn't generate interest/viewership in Texas is probably a waste of time.

In Texas, where do they get those viewers? Pac 12 won't take TCU or Baylor and A&M found a home in the SEC.

That leaves Texas, Texas Tech and Houston. 2 of those schools put 60K + in the seats with fans across the state.
Simple. SMU and Houston. Two major media markets.
05-22-2015 09:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RaiderRed Offline
Banned

Posts: 794
Joined: Nov 2014
I Root For: P5
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
(05-22-2015 09:06 PM)NoDak Wrote:  
(05-22-2015 07:22 PM)RaiderRed Wrote:  
(05-22-2015 05:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  The only other way I can see to help the P12N profits is expansion. Get more people in the footprint. The P12N would need to find a way to get into Texas. That's the biggest untapped state in the west for the conference. Adding additional schools is existing Pac12 states or low population untapped western states probably won't help much. Any expansion that doesn't generate interest/viewership in Texas is probably a waste of time.

In Texas, where do they get those viewers? Pac 12 won't take TCU or Baylor and A&M found a home in the SEC.

That leaves Texas, Texas Tech and Houston. 2 of those schools put 60K + in the seats with fans across the state.
Simple. SMU and Houston. Two major media markets.

BYU has a major media market as well and they have been told NO numerous times. I have a feeling SMU will find the same situation despite the glaring difference in support.

Larry Scott has options, no doubt about it. I wonder why he and the PAC 12 presidents are standing still?
05-22-2015 10:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chargeradio Offline
Vamos Morados
*

Posts: 7,492
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 128
I Root For: ALA, KY, USA
Location: Louisville, KY
Post: #23
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
The Pac 10 should have merged with what was left of the SWC in the 1990s. Colorado and Utah would have then been in the middle of the Pac 14 footprint, so Colorado likely leaves the Big 8 and Utah likely leaves the WAC, and both would join the Pac 16 in 1996.

Even if limited to two divisions, giving both divisions access to California and Texas would have allowed the Pac 16 maximum exposure for both recruiting and television. The permanent crossover games could have been setup to preserve rivalries for the California schools and Texas schools, and then the Northwest and Mountain schools could have been shuffled accordingly. Of course the Pac 16 could have pushed for championship game deregulation much sooner, which would have allowed the use of geographically-friendly quads. Both Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston would have been split Pac 16/Big 12 markets.

If Texas isn't coming, Baylor or North Texas is about is as close as the Pac 12 could get to doubling down in DFW. Of course now that Austin itself has grown to 912,000 people, it makes landing the Longhorns that much more lucrative.
05-24-2015 09:59 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NestaKnight1 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,844
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 99
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
(05-22-2015 07:22 PM)RaiderRed Wrote:  
(05-22-2015 05:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  The only other way I can see to help the P12N profits is expansion. Get more people in the footprint. The P12N would need to find a way to get into Texas. That's the biggest untapped state in the west for the conference. Adding additional schools is existing Pac12 states or low population untapped western states probably won't help much. Any expansion that doesn't generate interest/viewership in Texas is probably a waste of time.

In Texas, where do they get those viewers? Pac 12 won't take TCU or Baylor and A&M found a home in the SEC.

That leaves Texas, Texas Tech and Houston. 2 of those schools put 60K + in the seats with fans across the state.

True, but they might want to take a look at Texas Tech anyway.03-lmfao
05-25-2015 09:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bluesox Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,308
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 84
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Utah AD opines about changes in P12N ownership model
They should have never turned down OU and OK state to jump to 14. Team 15 is Texas Tech and team 16 is either Texas, Kansas, New mexico or Houston…assuming the pac 12 rules out private religious school's. I don't really see them making a move without taking any big 12 school's so it might be awhile.
05-25-2015 09:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.