As long as he’s giving away the store, how about throwing in some hookers and blow too? Or a home in Hawaii, right next to the Obama vacation home?

Quote:The State Department on Monday would not rule out giving Iran up to $50 billion as a so-called “signing bonus” for agreeing to a nuclear deal later this year, according to comments made to journalists following reports that the Obama administration had formulated a plan to release tens of billions of frozen Iranian funds.

Experts have said this multi-billion dollar “signing bonus” option, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, could be the largest cash infusion to a terror-backing regime in recent memory.

A cash release of $30 to $50 billion upon reaching a final nuclear agreement would come in addition to the more than $11 billion in unfrozen assets that Iran will already have received under an interim nuclear accord reached in 2013.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/04/...-for-iran/

Less expensive to destroy their Nuke facilities? I know Obama hates America but why just not Nuke yourself? He wants 10 years of 25 Million in income before America gets Nuked.

It is freeing up their assets, not an actual check from Uncle Sam.

There is a pretty big difference.

(04-21-2015 07:44 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It is freeing up their assets, not an actual check from Uncle Sam.

There is a pretty big difference.

No, it's Obama literally giving Iran $50 Billion dollars like the title said. Don't bring facts into this.

How about, destroy all of your nuke assets and we free up that money. Iran has no position of strength.

Already, some Arab states have indicated that they will not be attending (Oman), or will only send junior delegations (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates). Amir Taheri of the New York Post quotes one Arab official: “He is going to give a Churchillian speech. But we know that you can’t be Chamberlain one day and Churchill the next.”

Meanwhile, Israel quietly signals that it is not going to wait for a Churchill to arrive in the Oval Office.

(04-21-2015 07:56 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  How about, destroy all of your nuke assets and we free up that money. Iran has no position of strength.

Position of strength or no, I can see the Iranian leadership basically telling Obama to pound sand when it comes to verification...........and Obama and Kerry all but bending over and taking the refusal with no lube - but hey, legacy assured, check the signed paper.

Why does this board continually put up with ERC's antics? You have zero credibility ERC. Why anybody would give you any credence is beyond me.

(04-21-2015 08:08 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Why does this board continually put up with ERC's antics? You have zero credibility ERC. Why anybody would give you any credence is beyond me.

What antics he posted a news article? Why not comment on the content of the article Mach? Why do you attack the poster? You were banned for this before.

(04-21-2015 08:08 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Why does this board continually put up with ERC's antics? You have zero credibility ERC. Why anybody would give you any credence is beyond me.

He highlights the ridiculousness of the left. It's like shining a light on cockroaches.

Release of assets would be a favorable alternative to immediate suspension of sanctions for Iran. It should be part and parcel of the relaxation of sanctions, not an alternative.

It seems as if Congress should consider imposing sanctions on the Whitehouse to cut out some of their antics.

Did the title change. Originally it said Obama gave Iran a 50 billion signing bonus. Super fly and Uconn. You don't find that dishonest? What I'm wondering is how he changed the title without an edit time stamp?

I don't think it changed.

The title is still a little shady as in a bonus when it was their money held in escrow but I thought for sure he included Obama in the title when I first read it.

lol, if nothing else works, just bribe Iran. It will take the money and then do as it pleases anyway. Win win for Iran.

(04-21-2015 07:44 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It is freeing up their assets, not an actual check from Uncle Sam.

There is a pretty big difference.

Don't upset them with facts.

(04-22-2015 10:08 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-21-2015 07:44 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It is freeing up their assets, not an actual check from Uncle Sam.

There is a pretty big difference.

Don't upset them with facts.

It's the same thing, IMO. They can just sell assets or use said assets to basically write itself a check.