It's the battle of the anonymous sources!

(04-11-2015 06:46 AM)axeme Wrote:  It's the battle of the anonymous sources!

Actually my source is undisclosed not anonymous, I know who they are but they don't want to be named. He does not even mention sources.

The columnist at TBN love to speculate narratives and write them as fact. Gleason is guessing that Hurley was insulted at 551, he was guessing that the relationship soured.

He took the fact the contract was not signed as "evidence". I don't know if this is odd or not but few of our coaches sign their contracts right off the bat. It took Hurley several months to sign the last extension.

(04-11-2015 09:27 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-11-2015 06:46 AM)axeme Wrote:  It's the battle of the anonymous sources!

Actually my source is undisclosed not anonymous, I know who they are but they don't want to be named. He does not even mention sources.

The columnist at TBN love to speculate narratives and write them as fact. Gleason is guessing that Hurley was insulted at 551, he was guessing that the relationship soured.

He took the fact the contract was not signed as "evidence". I don't know if this is odd or not but few of our coaches sign their contracts right off the bat. It took Hurley several months to sign the last extension.

I'm not surprised about contracts as don't they need to be approved by the regents or trustees (or whatever a university has)?

I doubt most schools have a sub-committee approve the hires or do a voice (now e-mail) vote.

I'm curious how many other schools use a MoU as a 'placeholder' for a contract until the governing body approves it?