(04-07-2015 10:23 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 10:16 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 09:58 PM)tigerjeb Wrote:  6 of 8 inside the top 60 RPI & 5th ranked conference. not bad

And 5 of 8 inside the top 50 >>>

#24 USF
#36 Houston
#38 UConn
#40 UCF
#49 Memphis

And the AAC is now #4 baseball conference in RPI :)

http://warrennolan.com/baseball/2015/conferencerpi

Yessssiiiirrr!

(04-07-2015 10:27 PM)Piratelife4me Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 10:23 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 10:16 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 09:58 PM)tigerjeb Wrote:  6 of 8 inside the top 60 RPI & 5th ranked conference. not bad

And 5 of 8 inside the top 50 >>>

#24 USF
#36 Houston
#38 UConn
#40 UCF
#49 Memphis

And the AAC is now #4 baseball conference in RPI :)

http://warrennolan.com/baseball/2015/conferencerpi

Yessssiiiirrr!

Big East has also moved up to #20.

(04-07-2015 10:19 PM)Piratelife4me Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 06:27 AM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 01:43 AM)BearcatJerry Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 11:20 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 09:27 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  What part of we lost 4 games against the Top 100 and had to replace them with 4 games against the bottom 175 do you not understand. Had the original schedule held those SOS numbers would be way different. Piss poor weather is only reason our SOS numbers are close.

Here I'll make it simple,

What we were going to play,

ND 32
NCSU 76
Richmond 99
Michigan 55

Forced changes due to weather

UNC-G 176
Albany 226 x3

Stick those facts in your pipe and smoke it.

That's what he is saying you don't get. It's not about ECUs schedule, it was about UCs.

For ECUMBH, the world revolves around ECU. Every single thread is about ECU. Seriously. So the fact that UC scheduled an ambitious slate means...nothing...to him. The fact ECU's basketball schedule was weak in comparison to other schools, means...well...nothing to him. There is only ECU.

What? Guess you can't read. Guess you can't tell that our schedule changed because of weather forcing us to play lesser teams, hurting our SOS. If can't get that then you truly are stupid. Other are comparing the schedule played vs UC's. Not what we had to begin with.

Yes. ECU SOS was hurt by scheduling conflicts. This is not what UC(AAC) fans are debating.

UC sucks at baseball but still managed to play a top 65(ish) schedule OOC

ECU sucks at basketball but only scheduled 300(ish) schedule OOC.

At least UC challenged themselves.

Thats the point.

Basketball is over, this is about baseball, keep it to that. Our schedule got jacked up and was still higher ranked than UC's. We still have 15 games left against the RPI top 50. Congrats, you challenged yourselves and got killed, 8-21, 211 RPI.

(04-07-2015 10:29 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 10:27 PM)Piratelife4me Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 10:23 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 10:16 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 09:58 PM)tigerjeb Wrote:  6 of 8 inside the top 60 RPI & 5th ranked conference. not bad

And 5 of 8 inside the top 50 >>>

#24 USF
#36 Houston
#38 UConn
#40 UCF
#49 Memphis

And the AAC is now #4 baseball conference in RPI :)

http://warrennolan.com/baseball/2015/conferencerpi

Yessssiiiirrr!

Big East has also moved up to #20.

I know ECU is not pulling its fair share, but glad to see the conference doing well. Most of the conference has stepped up from previous years(while some maintain) and made a statement to this point. Look forward to an exciting race down the stretch

(04-07-2015 10:33 PM)Piratelife4me Wrote:  I know ECU is not pulling its fair share, but glad to see the conference doing well. Most of the conference has stepped up from previous year(while some maintain) and made a statement to this point. Look forward to an exciting race down the stretch

It won't take us long. CG is about to drop is bombs on people with recruiting and not just in conference.

(04-07-2015 10:33 PM)Piratelife4me Wrote:  I know ECU is not pulling its fair share, but glad to see the conference doing well. Most of the conference has stepped up from previous years(while some maintain) and made a statement to this point. Look forward to an exciting race down the stretch

Any team in basketball or basketball that has a RPI under 100 (in ooc play) is pulling its weight. Beyond that, it's good for the specific school to get its team into post season. But under 100 is doing right by the conference.
Every team is doing fine. Even Cincy....they played a decent schedule and, frankly, 8/8 teams being good is too much, as the league does need some breathing room.

It would be good to have a couple under 20, but I doubt that happens this year. These teams are too evenly matched.

(04-07-2015 10:19 PM)Piratelife4me Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 06:27 AM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 01:43 AM)BearcatJerry Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 11:20 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 09:27 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  What part of we lost 4 games against the Top 100 and had to replace them with 4 games against the bottom 175 do you not understand. Had the original schedule held those SOS numbers would be way different. Piss poor weather is only reason our SOS numbers are close.

Here I'll make it simple,

What we were going to play,

ND 32
NCSU 76
Richmond 99
Michigan 55

Forced changes due to weather

UNC-G 176
Albany 226 x3

Stick those facts in your pipe and smoke it.

That's what he is saying you don't get. It's not about ECUs schedule, it was about UCs.

For ECUMBH, the world revolves around ECU. Every single thread is about ECU. Seriously. So the fact that UC scheduled an ambitious slate means...nothing...to him. The fact ECU's basketball schedule was weak in comparison to other schools, means...well...nothing to him. There is only ECU.

What? Guess you can't read. Guess you can't tell that our schedule changed because of weather forcing us to play lesser teams, hurting our SOS. If can't get that then you truly are stupid. Other are comparing the schedule played vs UC's. Not what we had to begin with.

Yes. ECU SOS was hurt by scheduling conflicts. This is not what UC(AAC) fans are debating.

UC sucks at baseball but still managed to play a top 65(ish) schedule OOC

ECU sucks at basketball but only scheduled 300(ish) schedule OOC.

At least UC challenged themselves.

Thats the point.

Thank you, I really started to think I was crazy for a second. That went on for way too long and its almost definitely my doing, even if I was trying to make a legitimate point.

(04-06-2015 11:20 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 09:27 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 08:52 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 12:09 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 07:50 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  That statement right there shows how little you know

From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

STX you are wasting your time....he doesn't comprehend what you re saying...he's an ECU fan. Have mercy.

What part of we lost 4 games against the Top 100 and had to replace them with 4 games against the bottom 175 do you not understand. Had the original schedule held those SOS numbers would be way different. Piss poor weather is only reason our SOS numbers are close.

Here I'll make it simple,

What we were going to play,

ND 32
NCSU 76
Richmond 99
Michigan 55

Forced changes due to weather

UNC-G 176
Albany 226 x3

Stick those facts in your pipe and smoke it.

That's what he is saying you don't get. It's not about ECUs schedule, it was about UCs.

lol yup