(04-03-2015 11:29 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 11:28 AM)TigerBill Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 11:23 AM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 11:22 AM)tigerlands Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 11:06 AM)memphissince86 Wrote:  Pastner says "I knew none of this. Zero. Zilch"

According to Cohen's tweets.

I believe that wholeheartedly.

That's what he said about NCAA problems when he was hired

Which was true. RC knew for months but at Calipari's insistence he told nobody. It only came out after he left.

if RC had come out with that, Cal might have been "too dangerous to touch" for UK...

According to Stephen Smith...if Cal doesn't make the Final Four LAST year...he would have been fired from UK.
You want to talk about 'pressure' jobs?

(04-03-2015 11:46 AM)BIGDTiger Wrote:  Hey Pastner, your goody good we rock the APR clean program boat just sailed.

We should all email cjp at once demanding he step down. Dude is killing our program & cities love affair with tiger basketball.

jppstner@memphis.edu

Because some guys used a tutor (allegedly)? Good lord, that's dumb.

she apparently has multiple talents

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/stacie-leig...83/b1b/868

If the players had simply said, "yes, she tutored us." This would be a non-story. There's nothing wrong with tutoring. It may be a minor violation if they were getting it for free, but no problem.

As it is, their denials look ridiculous because they couldn't keep their story straight. Now, they're implicated.

Still, nothing will likely come of it - but it depends on how aggressive the University and the NCAA wants to be. I suppose they could get in and dig around some. But it would require reading papers submitted years ago and interviewing teachers and such - and that just seems like too much trouble to go through.

(04-03-2015 12:00 PM)k2tigers Wrote:  she apparently has multiple talents

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/stacie-leig...83/b1b/868

so this chick could write your paper, feed you some BBQ, and give you a quick rub down?

(04-03-2015 12:00 PM)k2tigers Wrote:  she apparently has multiple talents

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/stacie-leig...83/b1b/868

good Lord...'massage therapists' have long been a cover for prostitution in Memphis.

(04-03-2015 12:00 PM)k2tigers Wrote:  she apparently has multiple talents

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/stacie-leig...83/b1b/868

Hey, we all could use a good rub down, every now and then!

(04-03-2015 11:55 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  moreover, this person has felonies, and we're just going to believe her at her word?

p$id off

(04-03-2015 12:06 PM)MemphisTiger15 Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 12:00 PM)k2tigers Wrote:  she apparently has multiple talents

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/stacie-leig...83/b1b/868

so this chick could write your paper, feed you some BBQ, and give you a quick rub down?

She was just helping them bone up on their studies.

(04-03-2015 12:07 PM)EarthBoundMisfit Wrote:  [quote='k2tigers' pid='11951508' dateline='1428080443']
she apparently has multiple talents

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/stacie-leig...83/b1b/868

good Lord...'massage therapists' have long been a cover for prostitution AROUND THE WORLD.

FIFY

(04-03-2015 11:40 AM)bone Wrote:  Pearl got a show clause for a BBQ!

Maybe Pastner gets a show clause and we can term his a$$!!!

Need help with phonics much ???

Quote:Show-cause penalty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), a show-cause penalty is an administrative punishment ordering (for a limited time) that any NCAA penalties imposed on a coach found to have committed major rules violations, will stay in effect against that coach for the sanction(s)'s full duration -- and could also be transferred to any other NCAA-member school that hires the coach while the sanctions are still in effect. Both the school and coach are required to send letters to the NCAA agreeing to abide by any restrictions imposed, and, report back to the NCAA every 6 months, until either the end of the coach's employment or the show-cause penalty (whichever comes first). If the school wishes to avoid the NCAA penalties imposed on that coach, the college must send representatives to appear before the NCAA's Committee on Infractions, and "show cause" (i.e., evidence) as to why it should not be penalized for hiring that coach.[1] The penalty is intended to prevent a coach from escaping violations that he/she had a role in committing or allowing -- which are generally applied to the school (e.g., lost scholarships, forfeited wins) -- by merely resigning and taking a coaching job at another, un-penalized school. It is currently the most severe penalty that can be brought against a U.S. college sports coach.

Contrary to popular belief, an NCAA member school is allowed to hire a coach who is under an ongoing show-cause order. However, the show-cause restrictions make it prohibitively difficult for a coach with a show-cause order to get another collegiate job. As mentioned above, any school that hires a coach with an outstanding show-cause order can be penalized merely for hiring him. Additionally, that school could be severely punished if such a coach commits additional violations while the show-cause order is still in effect.[2] Consequently, most schools will not even consider hiring a coach with a show-cause penalty in effect, meaning that it usually has the effect of blackballing that coach from the collegiate ranks for the duration of the penalty. Many coaches who receive a show-cause penalty never coach again, even after the penalty expires, since a large number of athletic directors and university presidents are unwilling to hire someone with a history of major violations.[3]
.

I hope there aren't any football players involved in any of this.

(04-03-2015 12:13 PM)pdlglm Wrote:  I hope there aren't any football players involved in any of this.

It should be OK. I see this story culminating with a happy ending.

(04-03-2015 12:15 PM)3rdgenerationtiger Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 12:13 PM)pdlglm Wrote:  I hope there aren't any football players involved in any of this.

It should be OK. I see this story culminating with a happy ending.

cue oldmangrizz

(04-03-2015 11:57 AM)SigEpMike Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 11:46 AM)BIGDTiger Wrote:  Hey Pastner, your goody good we rock the APR clean program boat just sailed.

We should all email cjp at once demanding he step down. Dude is killing our program & cities love affair with tiger basketball.

jppstner@memphis.edu

Because some guys used a tutor (allegedly)? Good lord, that's dumb.

Look at all that tutoring...



I got downs.

(04-03-2015 12:13 PM)Cletus Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 11:40 AM)bone Wrote:  Pearl got a show clause for a BBQ!

Maybe Pastner gets a show clause and we can term his a$$!!!

Need help with phonics much ???

Quote:Show-cause penalty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), a show-cause penalty is an administrative punishment ordering (for a limited time) that any NCAA penalties imposed on a coach found to have committed major rules violations, will stay in effect against that coach for the sanction(s)'s full duration -- and could also be transferred to any other NCAA-member school that hires the coach while the sanctions are still in effect. Both the school and coach are required to send letters to the NCAA agreeing to abide by any restrictions imposed, and, report back to the NCAA every 6 months, until either the end of the coach's employment or the show-cause penalty (whichever comes first). If the school wishes to avoid the NCAA penalties imposed on that coach, the college must send representatives to appear before the NCAA's Committee on Infractions, and "show cause" (i.e., evidence) as to why it should not be penalized for hiring that coach.[1] The penalty is intended to prevent a coach from escaping violations that he/she had a role in committing or allowing -- which are generally applied to the school (e.g., lost scholarships, forfeited wins) -- by merely resigning and taking a coaching job at another, un-penalized school. It is currently the most severe penalty that can be brought against a U.S. college sports coach.

Contrary to popular belief, an NCAA member school is allowed to hire a coach who is under an ongoing show-cause order. However, the show-cause restrictions make it prohibitively difficult for a coach with a show-cause order to get another collegiate job. As mentioned above, any school that hires a coach with an outstanding show-cause order can be penalized merely for hiring him. Additionally, that school could be severely punished if such a coach commits additional violations while the show-cause order is still in effect.[2] Consequently, most schools will not even consider hiring a coach with a show-cause penalty in effect, meaning that it usually has the effect of blackballing that coach from the collegiate ranks for the duration of the penalty. Many coaches who receive a show-cause penalty never coach again, even after the penalty expires, since a large number of athletic directors and university presidents are unwilling to hire someone with a history of major violations.[3]
.

What about that Sanity Clause?

^ swimming parties are now against the rules?

(04-03-2015 12:20 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  ^ swimming parties are now against the rules?

They ain't swimming foo. They hoopin' on that ENTIRE backyard Grizz themed halfcourt.

Pastner knowing nothing about this is troubling.

(04-03-2015 12:21 PM)poppaslaw Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 12:20 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  ^ swimming parties are now against the rules?

They ain't swimming foo. They hoopin' on that ENTIRE backyard Grizz themed halfcourt.

What NCAA rule does that violate?