(03-14-2015 06:37 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 02:47 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 02:33 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 01:02 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  I just don't understand this talk of not afraid of any 6 thru 11 seeds or we can beat some 3 seeds. We couldn't beat Temple late in year ( a possible NCAA team ), we couldn't beat X ( at home ) who is a NCAA team, then we beat 5 non NCAA teams ( most were very bad ) and we can't beat UCONN on their home floor. Yet we are going to go beat all these other teams, most who have played in much tougher conferences than ours and we are just going to steam roll these teams.lol By the way, you win in March with guards, that is UC's big weakness. Last night was classic case in point.

You were very critical of many of us who said UC was going to be in the tournament and would be fine. Someone needs to give you a hug man... So negative all the time.

Just realistic, my glasses are not rose colored. I also said they would lose to UCONN in the first game. Just don't think their guards are good enough, hell I hope they win 5 or 6 in a row, but their is nothing in the last half of this year that screams UC is going to beat NCAA caliber teams back to back to back. Please tell me why they will, I'm reasonable.

Yea, but to be fair didn't you also say that UC would go 2-2 down the stretch.

Should I go back and find something where you were wrong, you really did that, wow. And other people said 3-1 and some people said 4-0, we all took shots at it. Some people said UC would win the conf. tourney, you gonna look for them to.

(03-14-2015 06:41 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 06:37 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 02:47 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 02:33 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 01:02 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  I just don't understand this talk of not afraid of any 6 thru 11 seeds or we can beat some 3 seeds. We couldn't beat Temple late in year ( a possible NCAA team ), we couldn't beat X ( at home ) who is a NCAA team, then we beat 5 non NCAA teams ( most were very bad ) and we can't beat UCONN on their home floor. Yet we are going to go beat all these other teams, most who have played in much tougher conferences than ours and we are just going to steam roll these teams.lol By the way, you win in March with guards, that is UC's big weakness. Last night was classic case in point.

You were very critical of many of us who said UC was going to be in the tournament and would be fine. Someone needs to give you a hug man... So negative all the time.

Just realistic, my glasses are not rose colored. I also said they would lose to UCONN in the first game. Just don't think their guards are good enough, hell I hope they win 5 or 6 in a row, but their is nothing in the last half of this year that screams UC is going to beat NCAA caliber teams back to back to back. Please tell me why they will, I'm reasonable.

Yea, but to be fair didn't you also say that UC would go 2-2 down the stretch.

Should I go back and find something where you were wrong, you really did that, wow.

He wasn't the one pretending to be Nostradamus.

(03-14-2015 06:43 PM)franzeal Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 06:41 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 06:37 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 02:47 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 02:33 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  You were very critical of many of us who said UC was going to be in the tournament and would be fine. Someone needs to give you a hug man... So negative all the time.

Just realistic, my glasses are not rose colored. I also said they would lose to UCONN in the first game. Just don't think their guards are good enough, hell I hope they win 5 or 6 in a row, but their is nothing in the last half of this year that screams UC is going to beat NCAA caliber teams back to back to back. Please tell me why they will, I'm reasonable.

Yea, but to be fair didn't you also say that UC would go 2-2 down the stretch.

Should I go back and find something where you were wrong, you really did that, wow.

He wasn't the one pretending to be Nostradamus.

The point is negativity. He was right about the negative loss but fails to mention his prediction of a 2 and 2 negative result when in fact we went 4-0.

You boys are definitely right, I should have known better than to throw my opinion into the mix. Anything not seen by rose colored glasses on this board is subject to bs my the majority on here. Bye. See you all next season. Good lord.

(03-14-2015 06:48 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  You boys are definitely right, I should have known better than to throw my opinion into the mix. Anything not seen by rose colored glasses on this board is subject to bs my the majority on here. Bye.

You are welcome and appreciated for your opinion. But not everyone is going to agree with you. For instance, I think this team plays hard and has over achieved based on talent and experience. They will not go all the way, but they may pull an upset.

(03-14-2015 06:45 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 06:43 PM)franzeal Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 06:41 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 06:37 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(03-14-2015 02:47 PM)CincyBro Wrote:  Just realistic, my glasses are not rose colored. I also said they would lose to UCONN in the first game. Just don't think their guards are good enough, hell I hope they win 5 or 6 in a row, but their is nothing in the last half of this year that screams UC is going to beat NCAA caliber teams back to back to back. Please tell me why they will, I'm reasonable.

Yea, but to be fair didn't you also say that UC would go 2-2 down the stretch.

Should I go back and find something where you were wrong, you really did that, wow.

He wasn't the one pretending to be Nostradamus.

The point is negativity. He was right about the negative loss but fails to mention his prediction of a 2 and 2 negative result when in fact we went 4-0.

I did not start any of this, go back and read post 521 and 522 and my post of 528, it was very fair.