(05-17-2016 06:18 PM)bucs77 Wrote: I personally don't have an issue with the ticket prices.
Make sure you understand the issue I've raised. It's not the absolute ticket prices - it's the fact that they've decided to profiteer just because the Awringe are coming to town. They're taking advantage of the situation in a way that punishes the most loyal fans. My objection has *nothing* to do with the absolute ticket prices.
Let me propose something I would have been ok with......
If they had made it known, by all reasonable means necessary (letters, on the website, media, etc., etc.) that they had decided that they had been under-pricing their ticket structure as a rule; that they had decided (and they could lay out the reasons) that their "product" (and I hate that term when used with sports) was worth more; that they were trying to "move to the next level" (or however they wanted to parse that); that they were thankful for all the past support of their fans; and that now they believed a "new era" had dawned at ETSU that justified a higher price point for ALL their tickets -- then I could live with that philosophy --
assuming they still charged the same for the UT tickets. If they raised season ticket prices 20-30%, NOT because of the UT game, but just "because we're (or "the experience is") worth it", and that was going to be the new price point going forward, then that would have been acceptable. (And that would have also had to have been the logic behind the increase in women's ticket prices.)
I don't feel totally comfortable even suggesting that scenario, but that would have been a much more tolerable approach than what they've done.
But.....to use the argument of "whatever-the-market-will-bear", or "flex pricing" (that one's funny), or "dynamic pricing", is just punishing the loyal, and pure profiteering.
And as Rod clearly made the point, if UT is going to be $25-35, then Miligan, UVa-Wise, and Tusculum should be about $3-$5. The fact that they apparently *don't* see it that way is even further evidence of simply taking advantage of the situation.
This is a classic textbook case of situational ethics. Heck, apparently some of you think that's an ok way to live life, perhaps having been inured to the ways of the world these days, and abandoning absolute right and wrong. (And I'm not making any personal judgements or attacks here; that's just a general commentary on accepting this way of thinking and doing business.)