(03-10-2015 04:28 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: I heard some of her speech on the radio.
She had some pretty fast and loose answers.
That speech is only going to make things worse for her.
The funny part (not haha funny...) was that although fast and loose, and clearly deceptive, she was reading them. The reporters were hand picked and it was obvious the answers were scripted and probably parsed by a roomful of lawyers so had to be put out very carefully- no deviation from said script.
That's why we got the Cankles cackle, her version of uhhhh, ummmm, nervous laugh, then the aforementioned "That's a lot of questions for one question" response to start each "answer".
The more I hear it again, the more awful it gets. This only adds to the questions and as you said, it's only going to get worse.
Course next step will be to bump her head again, wear some more funny glasses, take a month or so off the public stage then come back and claim "That's old news. We've been over that. What difference does it make and time to move on".
(03-10-2015 02:45 PM)NIU007 Wrote: I didn't see the press conference. Did she give any reason?
If she's damaged by this, the Republicans might win the election by default, whether they have a good candidate or not.
She said she thought it'd be too much to carry 2 phones.
No, really.
So a potential president thinks managing two phones is too much
Smh
That's exactly what I was thinking. It's just stupid, but she'll get away with it, dems always do. And of course we get the typical white house "We heard it on the news" response. Did Obama never communicate via email to his own Secretary of State? Is he too stupid to realize it was not a gov't addy if he did? Either answer is just flat out awful and shows this administration is incredibly incompetent or incredibly deceptive. I can't even express what I really think of this BS.
Silver Lining....At least IRS big wigs use gov't email. Although, they just blatantly destroy them if anyone asks for them.
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2015 07:24 PM by Pyrizzo.)
(03-10-2015 02:45 PM)NIU007 Wrote: I didn't see the press conference. Did she give any reason?
If she's damaged by this, the Republicans might win the election by default, whether they have a good candidate or not.
She said she thought it'd be too much to carry 2 phones.
No, really.
So a potential president thinks managing two phones is too much
Smh
That's exactly what I was thinking. It's just stupid, but she'll get away with it, dems always do. And of course we get the typical white house "We heard it on the news" response. Did Obama never communicate via email to his own Secretary of State? Is he too stupid to realize it was not a gov't addy if he did? Either answer is just flat out awful and shows this administration is incredibly incompetent or incredibly deceptive. I can't even express what I really think of this BS.
Silver Lining....At least IRS big wigs use gov't email. Although, they just blatantly destroy them if anyone asks for them.
This might be worthy of a poll or contest- whats the over under in # of days before the "Clinton Server" (no not named lewinsky) suffers a catastrophic meltdown?
I'll say around 3 weeks or so, on a Friday, maybe a long weekend Friday (is there one coming up?) and it'll be blamed on "hackers" that will never be found.
Re: RE: Just watched Pantsuits press conference...
(03-10-2015 05:37 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:
(03-10-2015 05:34 PM)Fitbud Wrote:
(03-10-2015 04:26 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:
(03-10-2015 04:24 PM)Fitbud Wrote: Most transparent doesn't mean 100% transparent.
But it does mean greater than 0% transparent.
So you saying this administration has 0 transperancy? Come on man, your better than that.
I'll play. This administration is usually somewhat transparent about Obama's vacations and his golf outings. They are less transparent about his schedule. They have zero transparency about their numerous scandals. In fact, how could they be transparent when they find out everything on the news?
But haven't they released lots of classified documents? Haven't they agreed to release emails?
(03-10-2015 04:24 PM)Fitbud Wrote: Most transparent doesn't mean 100% transparent.
But it does mean greater than 0% transparent.
So you saying this administration has 0 transperancy? Come on man, your better than that.
I'll play. This administration is usually somewhat transparent about Obama's vacations and his golf outings. They are less transparent about his schedule. They have zero transparency about their numerous scandals. In fact, how could they be transparent when they find out everything on the news?
But haven't they released lots of classified documents? Haven't they agreed to release emails?
Right. They've released lots of things, but not everything. They are choosing what to make public.
Re: RE: Just watched Pantsuits press conference...
(03-10-2015 02:27 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote: Nothing has changed. She is as big a liar as Obama. She also thinks Americans are stupid. She had no answer to the hard questions except her version of what she wants us to believe. Not happening. She is just as arrogant and dirty as it gets.
So how far was big Hill into this press conference when she just threw her hands up and said, "What difference does it make?" Now go eat cake peasants.
Chutzpah! Video Of Hillary: “The Server Will Remain Private” Because I Say So
The attitude on this video is just astonishing. She was shaking her head so much in response to the question about deleting emails, I thought her head was going to spin completely around. Of course, she then admitted she had done just that to about half of her emails. Of course, only the “private” ones…
She claimed all the server has on it now is her private emails with her husband. So the “server will remain private”.
Of course, Bill’s spokesman just said he doesn’t send email, that he’s only sent two in his life, while he was president.
Strangely timed statement one would think on Bill’s part. Did he mean to undermine her story?
Also notice how she isn’t looking you in the eye mostly as she talks.
I suspect Trey Gowdy will have something to Hillary by way of a subpoena for the server.
(03-10-2015 04:24 PM)Fitbud Wrote: Most transparent doesn't mean 100% transparent.
But it does mean greater than 0% transparent.
So you saying this administration has 0 transperancy? Come on man, your better than that.
He's forgetting the 1% of the White House visitor logs that Obama released in his first year in office (that the left had a transparencygasm over). That was before his administration went to court to fight having to release more.
Anyone want to wager on how long it is until we learn that the server melted down in a totally "accidantal" catastrophic fire rendering it completely useless?
/
Just watched Pantsuits press conference...
