Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
Author Message
BE4evah Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 760
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 2
I Root For: Big East
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 10:40 AM)westwolf Wrote:  As Jim realizes, UConn is now small potatoes.

I don't think that Jim means that U-Conn is small potatoes. Sure, against the major conferences and major teams, it is not on that level. But with basketball U-Conn can still compete and try to be competitive with the majors, just like the Big East is doing this year. Of course, trying to compete with schools that start out of the box with an advantage of $30 or $40 million is hard to do. But that isn't unique to U-Conn.

So long as the NCAA tournament allows mid majors in by way of selection or conference champions, basketball teams can compete. I think the danger will come if/when the major conferences start changing the parameters of the NCAA tournament or start their own.
03-10-2015 11:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagle78 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,390
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 111
I Root For: BC
Location:
Post: #22
Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 09:02 AM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  I think the football brand thing is a bunch of crap....

How good is Boston College's football brand. How much better is it right now over UConn?

I know they have more history and tradition, but IMO that's it. UConn has as much support, is a State flagship, a nice enough stadium...

Has Pitt been that much more relevant than UConn in football over the past 10 years? Seems about even to me.

Has Syracuse?

Bottom line....realignment is about the "good old boys" network. The past. That is the easiest way to describe UConn's lack of entry into the P5. It has nothing to do with what they have, what they are...now. It has everything to do with what happened in 1960 or whatever...legends of Tony Dorsett or a Hail Mary by Doug Flutie...

The P5 is a "club"...invitation only. Matters nothing about who or what you are....matters more who your father is or who you know...

Um...really? You think it's only history and tradition? How about the fact that Boston College is also a winning football program and Uconn is not. Uconn has played in a D1 conference for 11 seasons - and has winning records in only 5 of those. The past 4 years they have finished with records of 5-7, 5-7, 3-9, and 2-10. By comparison, in its last 16 years of D1 Conference Play, BC has had 14 winning seasons.

This is NOT intended to be a criticism of Uconn, but the gulf between BC FB to Uconn FB is far wider than just history and tradition.

Oh, and Quo, 14 winning seasons out of the past 16 is not the definition of a program in a "sorry state". Geez
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2015 12:06 PM by Eagle78.)
03-10-2015 12:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,881
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 898
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #23
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 12:03 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 09:02 AM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  I think the football brand thing is a bunch of crap....

How good is Boston College's football brand. How much better is it right now over UConn?

I know they have more history and tradition, but IMO that's it. UConn has as much support, is a State flagship, a nice enough stadium...

Has Pitt been that much more relevant than UConn in football over the past 10 years? Seems about even to me.

Has Syracuse?

Bottom line....realignment is about the "good old boys" network. The past. That is the easiest way to describe UConn's lack of entry into the P5. It has nothing to do with what they have, what they are...now. It has everything to do with what happened in 1960 or whatever...legends of Tony Dorsett or a Hail Mary by Doug Flutie...

The P5 is a "club"...invitation only. Matters nothing about who or what you are....matters more who your father is or who you know...

Um...really? You think it's only history and tradition? How about the fact that Boston College is also a winning football program and Uconn is not. Uconn has played in a D1 conference for 11 seasons - and has winning records in only 5 of those. The past 4 years they have finished with records of 5-7, 5-7, 3-9, and 2-10. By comparison, in its last 16 years of D1 Conference Play, BC has had 14 winning seasons.

This is NOT intended to be a criticism of Uconn, but the gulf between BC FB to Uconn FB is far wider than just history and tradition.

Oh, and Quo, 14 winning seasons out of the past 16 is not the definition of a program in a "sorry state". Geez


Agreed, Eagle. As an ND fan, I am not predisposed to defend BC, but people are overstating BC's football struggles.
03-10-2015 12:31 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Offline
The Black Knight of The Deplorables

Posts: 9,618
Joined: Oct 2013
I Root For: Army, SFU
Location: Michie Stadium 1945
Post: #24
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
I know one thing that Boston College and UConn have in common:

Both have lost to Army in college football recently! 04-rock


(03-10-2015 10:39 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 09:25 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Correct. The good ol' boys built a clubhouse and posted a "go away" sign on the door, even though some guys on the outside could kick butt on some guys inside.

Are there schools in conferences below the AAC in the pecking order that could kick butt on AAC teams? Yes there are. Is the AAC is letting them in? I don't think so.

Great point. I have noticed that fellow G5 fans have their own pecking when it comes to evaluating conferences and teams.
03-10-2015 12:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,018
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2372
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #25
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 12:03 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  Oh, and Quo, 14 winning seasons out of the past 16 is not the definition of a program in a "sorry state". Geez

You guys haven't lost fewer than 5 games since 2007 and you've lost 5 straight bowls, all minor, during that time. If you have any standards at all, that's a pretty sorry state. 07-coffee3
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2015 12:59 PM by quo vadis.)
03-10-2015 12:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vandiver49 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
Post: #26
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 10:30 AM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 09:25 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 09:02 AM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  I think the football brand thing is a bunch of crap....

How good is Boston College's football brand. How much better is it right now over UConn?

I know they have more history and tradition, but IMO that's it. UConn has as much support, is a State flagship, a nice enough stadium...

Has Pitt been that much more relevant than UConn in football over the past 10 years? Seems about even to me.

Has Syracuse?

Bottom line....realignment is about the "good old boys" network. The past. That is the easiest way to describe UConn's lack of entry into the P5. It has nothing to do with what they have, what they are...now. It has everything to do with what happened in 1960 or whatever...legends of Tony Dorsett or a Hail Mary by Doug Flutie...

The P5 is a "club"...invitation only. Matters nothing about who or what you are....matters more who your father is or who you know...

Correct. The good ol' boys built a clubhouse and posted a "go away" sign on the door, even though some guys on the outside could kick butt on some guys inside.

They'll still use the "football brand" issue successfully until a G5 school does well consistently for many years. The game is rigged, but the conference membership lists are not set in stone.

No they won't...Boise has done it consistently and they aren't in it. It has nothing to do with your product, stadium, whatever...it has everything to do with the past. Why is Wake Forest in the ACC? Why is Vandy in the SEC? Because of their TV market value? Fan base? Tradition? C'mon....it's who you knew and when.

The Grandpa's are running college football and deciding who gets to play and who doesn't...because they want to watch what they grew up watching. They don't want to watch Boise play UCF...they say they built the foundation for Boise and UCF to play...which is a bunch of hogwash. Boise and UCF built their own thing, irregardless of what Purdue did in 1962...or BC did in 1982.

UConn doesn't fit...because BC and Syracuse and Pitt has to fit. They are part of the "club" that created the BCS...they "made" UConn in their eyes...

It's a club built on exclusivity and timelessness. But that doesn't mean that when dictated by certain circumstances that rules can't be built. Your angst over Pitt and 'Cuse is really about how those two b'ball brands were able to escape the sinking Big East while UConn didn't. Well from the ACC's perspective, they needed to appease FSU and Clemson which obviously the Huskies can't do.
03-10-2015 01:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
C2__ Offline
Caltex2
*

Posts: 23,634
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 552
I Root For: Houston, PVAMU
Location: Zamunda
Post: #27
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 10:30 AM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  No they won't...Boise has done it consistently and they aren't in it. It has nothing to do with your product, stadium, whatever...it has everything to do with the past. Why is Wake Forest in the ACC? Why is Vandy in the SEC? Because of their TV market value? Fan base? Tradition? C'mon....it's who you knew and when.

The Grandpa's are running college football and deciding who gets to play and who doesn't...because they want to watch what they grew up watching. They don't want to watch Boise play UCF...they say they built the foundation for Boise and UCF to play...which is a bunch of hogwash. Boise and UCF built their own thing, irregardless of what Purdue did in 1962...or BC did in 1982.

UConn doesn't fit...because BC and Syracuse and Pitt has to fit. They are part of the "club" that created the BCS...they "made" UConn in their eyes...

01-lauramac2

03-lmfao
03-10-2015 01:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
blunderbuss Offline
Banned

Posts: 19,649
Joined: Apr 2011
I Root For: ECU & the CSA
Location: Buzz City, NC
Post: #28
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 12:58 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 12:03 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  Oh, and Quo, 14 winning seasons out of the past 16 is not the definition of a program in a "sorry state". Geez

You guys haven't lost fewer than 5 games since 2007 and you've lost 5 straight bowls, all minor, during that time. If you have any standards at all, that's a pretty sorry state. 07-coffee3

Speaking of sorry states... USF football and men's basketball combined for 13 wins this year. 04-coffee
03-10-2015 01:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wedge Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 19,862
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 964
I Root For: California
Location: IV, V, VI, IX
Post: #29
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 10:37 AM)Bull Wrote:  I thought that train went to Clarksville... not Tuscon. ;-)

Maybe Jim Calhoun prefers obscure novels to Monkees songs.

http://www.amazon.com/Train-Tucson-Train...1411644050

[Image: 41zaog5Y-iL.jpg]
03-10-2015 01:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BIgCatonProwl Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,171
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 35
I Root For: Houston Cougars
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 12:31 PM)TerryD Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 12:03 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 09:02 AM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  I think the football brand thing is a bunch of crap....

How good is Boston College's football brand. How much better is it right now over UConn?

I know they have more history and tradition, but IMO that's it. UConn has as much support, is a State flagship, a nice enough stadium...

Has Pitt been that much more relevant than UConn in football over the past 10 years? Seems about even to me.

Has Syracuse?

Bottom line....realignment is about the "good old boys" network. The past. That is the easiest way to describe UConn's lack of entry into the P5. It has nothing to do with what they have, what they are...now. It has everything to do with what happened in 1960 or whatever...legends of Tony Dorsett or a Hail Mary by Doug Flutie...

The P5 is a "club"...invitation only. Matters nothing about who or what you are....matters more who your father is or who you know...

Um...really? You think it's only history and tradition? How about the fact that Boston College is also a winning football program and Uconn is not. Uconn has played in a D1 conference for 11 seasons - and has winning records in only 5 of those. The past 4 years they have finished with records of 5-7, 5-7, 3-9, and 2-10. By comparison, in its last 16 years of D1 Conference Play, BC has had 14 winning seasons.

This is NOT intended to be a criticism of Uconn, but the gulf between BC FB to Uconn FB is far wider than just history and tradition.

Oh, and Quo, 14 winning seasons out of the past 16 is not the definition of a program in a "sorry state". Geez


Agreed, Eagle. As an ND fan, I am not predisposed to defend BC, but people are overstating BC's football struggles.

Agree BC has great tradition, as one informed observer of realignment stated, to be invited to the P5 party (when expansion happens again) lot of it will be based on, the FB tradition and reputation of the school, which are intangibles, along with the market they are in.
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2015 01:32 PM by BIgCatonProwl.)
03-10-2015 01:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagle78 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,390
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 111
I Root For: BC
Location:
Post: #31
Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 12:58 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 12:03 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  Oh, and Quo, 14 winning seasons out of the past 16 is not the definition of a program in a "sorry state". Geez

You guys haven't lost fewer than 5 games since 2007 and you've lost 5 straight bowls, all minor, during that time. If you have any standards at all, that's a pretty sorry state. 07-coffee3

LOL...so a 7-5 regular season and making a bowl is an example of a "sorry state"??? LMFAO. I don't think even you believe that idiocy. You do realize to make all those bowls they had to have winning seasons in all those years, right?

7-5 and making a bowl may be an indication of an "average-to slightly better" team, maybe. But "sorry state"?? No, "sorry state" is 2-10.

Question for the Board - ever notice how when somebody says something here that is dumb and gets called out on it with facts, all they often do is double down on dumb?

Winning season and making a even a minor bowl is indicative of a program in a "sorry state". Geez, now I have heard everything.
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2015 02:09 PM by Eagle78.)
03-10-2015 02:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
arkstfan Away
Sorry folks
*

Posts: 25,818
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 967
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
Post: #32
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
Here's the thing about realignment.

You make someone an equity partner based on the evidence of the day. Financial committment, fan support, results, academics, and geography.

What you don't do is walk back a decade later and say, "Hey we were wrong, we want to take your equity away and kick you out."

Off the top of my head I can only name some small conference instances where a league expelled or came close to expelling an equity member.

What BC has done or not done since accepting an invitiation is not relevant to the discussion of ACC's expansion criteria, you have to look at what their expansion committee looked at.
03-10-2015 02:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagle78 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,390
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 111
I Root For: BC
Location:
Post: #33
Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 02:23 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  Here's the thing about realignment.

You make someone an equity partner based on the evidence of the day. Financial committment, fan support, results, academics, and geography.

What you don't do is walk back a decade later and say, "Hey we were wrong, we want to take your equity away and kick you out."

Off the top of my head I can only name some small conference instances where a league expelled or came close to expelling an equity member.

What BC has done or not done since accepting an invitiation is not relevant to the discussion of ACC's expansion criteria, you have to look at what their expansion committee looked at.

I don't disagree with you, but, while on the subject of what BC has done since joining the ACC, here is its cumulative W-L record against since joining the Conference, compared with the rest of the ACC.

1. Virginia Tech: 96-38
2. Clemson: 89-42
3. Florida State: 84-38
4. Louisville: 82-44
5. Georgia Tech: 81-54
6. Miami: 75-54
7. Boston College: 74-55
8. Pittsburgh: 68-55
9. NC State: 61-64
10. Wake Forest: 58-66
11. UVA: 52-70
12. UNC: 48-61
13. Syracuse: 45-77
14. Duke: 42-81

Since coming to the ACC, Boston College has finished in the top half of the conference in terms of wins and losses. This despite enduring 4 years of a disastrous coaching situation. (BTW, if Syracuse, Pitt and Louisville were removed firm this list and replaced by Maryland, BC would have still finished in the top half of the original 12 team Conference.)
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2015 03:53 PM by Eagle78.)
03-10-2015 03:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UConn-SMU Offline
often wrong, never in doubt
*

Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
Post: #34
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
My anti-BC cred is off the charts (I'm a UConn alum/fan), but BC has a good FB program. It seems like they went 15 straight years at 8-4 with a bowl. Then they had a very bad couple years and now they're on their way back.

My contention has always been that UConn could do better on a level playing field in the same conference. But that's a different issue and we may never know the answer to that.
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2015 04:05 PM by UConn-SMU.)
03-10-2015 04:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,018
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2372
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #35
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 02:01 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 12:58 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 12:03 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  Oh, and Quo, 14 winning seasons out of the past 16 is not the definition of a program in a "sorry state". Geez

You guys haven't lost fewer than 5 games since 2007 and you've lost 5 straight bowls, all minor, during that time. If you have any standards at all, that's a pretty sorry state. 07-coffee3

LOL...so a 7-5 regular season and making a bowl is an example of a "sorry state"???

Are standards really so low at BC these days that you think 7-6, 7-6, 2-10, 4-8, 7-6, which are your last 5 seasons, are indicative of anything but a "sorry state"?

And you do realize that those three pathetic "winning seasons" you put so much stock in calling them wouldn't even be winning seasons without wins over FCS schools each of those years?

What a sad clown. 03-lmfao
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2015 04:56 PM by quo vadis.)
03-10-2015 04:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagle78 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,390
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 111
I Root For: BC
Location:
Post: #36
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 04:54 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 02:01 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 12:58 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 12:03 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  Oh, and Quo, 14 winning seasons out of the past 16 is not the definition of a program in a "sorry state". Geez

You guys haven't lost fewer than 5 games since 2007 and you've lost 5 straight bowls, all minor, during that time. If you have any standards at all, that's a pretty sorry state. 07-coffee3

LOL...so a 7-5 regular season and making a bowl is an example of a "sorry state"???

Are standards really so low at BC these days that you think 7-6, 7-6, 2-10, 4-8, 7-6, which are your last 5 seasons, are indicative of anything but a "sorry state"?

And you do realize that those three pathetic "winning seasons" you put so much stock in calling them wouldn't even be winning seasons without wins over FCS schools each of those years?

What a sad clown. 03-lmfao

Sad clown. Yeah, that's the ticket! You can always tell a moron when they go around demeaning others while demonstrating for the world their abject stupidity.

Where to begin. Yeah, BC played an FCS a school in each of those years. Guess what? So didn't virtually every other D1 school. Look it up. Alabama, Ohio State, Florida State, etc., etc., etc. You gonna discount their wins too? Or just BC's?

BCS had a disastrous coach for a few years - and in THOSE couple of years, it's probably was in a sorry state. The new coaching staff has returned BC to respectability.

7-6 this year. With a wins over a ranked USC (was #9 when BC played them), Virginia Tech, and NC State, all bowl teams. They took Florida State to the last second, was a dropped pass away form beating Clemson, and would have beaten PSU if they had a kicker.

7-6 is not a world beater. But a 7-5 regular season and a close bowl loss for a team that is still rebuilding is hardly in a "sorry state".

Good Lord, I have to believe you are being argumentative because nobody could be this dumb - because only an idiot would label a turnaround from a 2 win season to two consecutive 7 win seasons as a "sorry state."
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2015 06:59 PM by Eagle78.)
03-10-2015 06:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DefCONNOne Offline
That damn MLS!!

Posts: 11,005
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: UCONN
Location: MLS HQ
Post: #37
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 12:31 PM)TerryD Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 12:03 PM)Eagle78 Wrote:  
(03-10-2015 09:02 AM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  I think the football brand thing is a bunch of crap....

How good is Boston College's football brand. How much better is it right now over UConn?

I know they have more history and tradition, but IMO that's it. UConn has as much support, is a State flagship, a nice enough stadium...

Has Pitt been that much more relevant than UConn in football over the past 10 years? Seems about even to me.

Has Syracuse?

Bottom line....realignment is about the "good old boys" network. The past. That is the easiest way to describe UConn's lack of entry into the P5. It has nothing to do with what they have, what they are...now. It has everything to do with what happened in 1960 or whatever...legends of Tony Dorsett or a Hail Mary by Doug Flutie...

The P5 is a "club"...invitation only. Matters nothing about who or what you are....matters more who your father is or who you know...

Um...really? You think it's only history and tradition? How about the fact that Boston College is also a winning football program and Uconn is not. Uconn has played in a D1 conference for 11 seasons - and has winning records in only 5 of those. The past 4 years they have finished with records of 5-7, 5-7, 3-9, and 2-10. By comparison, in its last 16 years of D1 Conference Play, BC has had 14 winning seasons.

This is NOT intended to be a criticism of Uconn, but the gulf between BC FB to Uconn FB is far wider than just history and tradition.

Oh, and Quo, 14 winning seasons out of the past 16 is not the definition of a program in a "sorry state". Geez


Agreed, Eagle. As an ND fan, I am not predisposed to defend BC, but people are overstating BC's football struggles.

Your hatred of UCONN football/athletics has been firmly established.
03-10-2015 07:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rabbit_in_Red Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,496
Joined: Sep 2013
I Root For: Louisville, ACC
Location:
Post: #38
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
But no really, is a USF fan talking crap about football!?
03-10-2015 08:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UConn-SMU Offline
often wrong, never in doubt
*

Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
Post: #39
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
(03-10-2015 08:22 PM)Rabbit_in_Red Wrote:  But no really, is a USF fan talking crap about football!?

He's not pro USF. He's anti-AAC, anti-UConn, etc.
03-10-2015 08:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rabbit_in_Red Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,496
Joined: Sep 2013
I Root For: Louisville, ACC
Location:
Post: #40
RE: Former coach Calhoun on U-Conn: Realignment has passed U-Conn by
I'm anti-UConn, and I've never been bashful about that...but seriously, a USF fan talking about any other program being in a "sorry state"...that's just sickening irony.
03-10-2015 09:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.