CollegeCard Wrote:

TopCoog Wrote:Louisville could not have beaten Boise last year either. Big East schools simply do not have the athletes schools like OU have. Its just a different level of play.

Par for the course with you coogie, but do you realize you are contradicting yourself very badly?

I won't even get into the fact that I do think UofL has the athletes to compete with pretty much everyone now. If we say they don't for the sake of argument, what does that prove? Do you want to tell the board that Boise St has the athletes that Oklahoma does? There are many many other factors such as coaching and player development once on campus. You're argument is blown out of the water in a massive fashion by claiming its about athletes and that no one competes with OU in that regard.

You'd save yourself a lot more trouble if you chose someone besides the underachieving Sooners as your example, since they just lost to a team that doesn't have the "talent" of anyone else that finished the season in the top 15. That isn't my opinion, but the opinion of every national football person in the country.

P.S.- Please contact your doctor. Your hard-on for all things Big 12 has lasted longer than 4 hours, and you should seek immediate medical attention!

I can wink and take up for conference mates on most subjects...but this one takes the cake...of course Louisville has the athletes to play with anyone, but choke at most every chance they have to win a big one....

On Wings of Eagles Wrote:Keep it up TopCoog...the truth is killing the small least lite bush league..

What truth? That the fans of a mid-major conference are trolling the board of a power conference? That's the only truth I see.

On Wings of Eagles Wrote:

CollegeCard Wrote:

TopCoog Wrote:Louisville could not have beaten Boise last year either. Big East schools simply do not have the athletes schools like OU have. Its just a different level of play.

Par for the course with you coogie, but do you realize you are contradicting yourself very badly?

I won't even get into the fact that I do think UofL has the athletes to compete with pretty much everyone now. If we say they don't for the sake of argument, what does that prove? Do you want to tell the board that Boise St has the athletes that Oklahoma does? There are many many other factors such as coaching and player development once on campus. You're argument is blown out of the water in a massive fashion by claiming its about athletes and that no one competes with OU in that regard.

You'd save yourself a lot more trouble if you chose someone besides the underachieving Sooners as your example, since they just lost to a team that doesn't have the "talent" of anyone else that finished the season in the top 15. That isn't my opinion, but the opinion of every national football person in the country.

P.S.- Please contact your doctor. Your hard-on for all things Big 12 has lasted longer than 4 hours, and you should seek immediate medical attention!

I can wink and take up for conference mates on most subjects...but this one takes the cake...of course Louisville has the athletes to play with anyone, but choke at most every chance they have to win a big one....

Yeah, they really choked in the Orange bowl. Go back to supporting your mid-major program. Because everyone knows that Houston and Southern Miss are mid-major programs. Props to your conference champion getting their asses kicked by the SEC's 8th place team! lmfao

CatsClaw Wrote:

On Wings of Eagles Wrote:

CollegeCard Wrote:

TopCoog Wrote:Louisville could not have beaten Boise last year either. Big East schools simply do not have the athletes schools like OU have. Its just a different level of play.

Par for the course with you coogie, but do you realize you are contradicting yourself very badly?

I won't even get into the fact that I do think UofL has the athletes to compete with pretty much everyone now. If we say they don't for the sake of argument, what does that prove? Do you want to tell the board that Boise St has the athletes that Oklahoma does? There are many many other factors such as coaching and player development once on campus. You're argument is blown out of the water in a massive fashion by claiming its about athletes and that no one competes with OU in that regard.

You'd save yourself a lot more trouble if you chose someone besides the underachieving Sooners as your example, since they just lost to a team that doesn't have the "talent" of anyone else that finished the season in the top 15. That isn't my opinion, but the opinion of every national football person in the country.

P.S.- Please contact your doctor. Your hard-on for all things Big 12 has lasted longer than 4 hours, and you should seek immediate medical attention!

I can wink and take up for conference mates on most subjects...but this one takes the cake...of course Louisville has the athletes to play with anyone, but choke at most every chance they have to win a big one....

Yeah, they really choked in the Orange bowl. Go back to supporting your mid-major program. Because everyone knows that Houston and Southern Miss are mid-major programs. Props to your conference champion getting their asses kicked by the SEC's 8th place team! lmfao

If Houston is a mid major program Cincy must be D-III. Its like camparing an indy car to a model A.