(03-03-2015 09:11 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 09:06 AM)Crebman Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 08:58 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 08:44 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 08:38 AM)Smaug Wrote:  It doesn't matter.

She's the left's demigod, and all questions of legality, morality, or competence are irrelevant.

You finally understand, now get in line.

So tell me, fizzy. What in her background tells you she'll be a good president?

I always figured the cult of personality required someone with a personality.

Breaking the next great barrier - She has female parts - she has a "D" next to her name on the ballot. This is ALL that matters. Nothing else does. But you already knew that.

It's sad that the leftists are so shallow.

Evidently they don't learn from past mistakes.

(03-03-2015 07:54 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Nothing will happen. She's untouchable and if any republican suggests an investigation it will be deemed a witch hunt.

Certainly they Wouldn't !

No big fat defense of her?

Certainly not the type of judgment or common sense required by someone with Presidential aspirations.

MSNBC Host: ‘No Conceivable Rational Explanation’ For Hillary To Use Non-State Dept Email



When MSNBC is coming down on Pantsuits for this email law violation, then she has REAL problems.

Video here

Quote:In the wake of a New York Times report Monday night that Hillary Clinton used a personal email rather than an official State Department address during her tenure as secretary of state, one MSNBC host slammed the presumptive 2016 nominee’s decision.

In the immediate aftermath, a baffled Lawrence O’Donnell said there is “no conceivable rational explanation” for the former secretary to “legitimately” use a personal email in absence of an official State Department one.

“This is not a senior official at the Environmental Protection Agency or the Department of Agriculture. This is the secretary of state using a not secure commercial email system,” O’Donnell said.

“I just think there is something more going on here because it just raises so many questions,” said MSNBC analyst Beth Fouhy. “Where were the State Department lawyers who allowed this to go forward? Where were the top diplomats in other countries receiving these emails from HRC@yahoo.com or something like that saying ‘wait a minute, this can’t possibly be an official missive from the secretary of state of the United States.’”

“She is a very secretive person, there’s no question about it,” Fouhy said. “For her to just willingly violate it to just to preserve some semblance of privacy really makes no sense.”

“Well, if it’s true that she never used a State Department email address, we have something that at first read has no conceivable rational explanation to it that is legitimate,” O’Donnell said incredulously.

You know this is all a bald face lie about Hillary.

I can't wait for the Justice Dept to look into this.

(03-03-2015 10:58 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I can't wait for the Justice Dept to look into this.

Lmao... I hope that was sarcasm.

(03-03-2015 07:45 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Hillary was required to keep her e-mails on a government account, but she refused to set up an account. She exclusively used her personal e-mail account for government business. This allowed her to maintain complete control over what e-mails were kept. It also violated federal law. A government archivist said this was unprecedented. This is so Clintonian.

Contrast this with Jeb Bush who just released every e-mail he had as governor of Florida. That's all you need to know to contrast typical Bush and Clinton behavior.

Maybe someone can link the NY Times article.

This and the Clinton Foundation. Hillary is going to get pillaged. I just wish all of this came out after she gets the nomination... I don't want her derailed until then. God forbid Elizabeth Warren decides to run and gets the nomination... ]

(03-03-2015 11:02 AM)No Bull Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 07:45 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Hillary was required to keep her e-mails on a government account, but she refused to set up an account. She exclusively used her personal e-mail account for government business. This allowed her to maintain complete control over what e-mails were kept. It also violated federal law. A government archivist said this was unprecedented. This is so Clintonian.

Contrast this with Jeb Bush who just released every e-mail he had as governor of Florida. That's all you need to know to contrast typical Bush and Clinton behavior.

Maybe someone can link the NY Times article.

This and the Clinton Foundation. Hillary is going to get pillaged. I just wish all of this came out after she gets the nomination... I don't want her derailed until then. God forbid Elizabeth Warren decides to run and gets the nomination... ]

If Elizabeth Warren is honestly the best the Libs have to throw out there... then they are in MUCH worse shape than they proclaim the Republicans to be in.

Let's not forget that the Democrats got SHELLACKED in 2014. Things are trending downwards for them, and Obama is simply doing as much damage as he can with his pen until he's out of office.

It's much easier to solicit donations to the Clinton Foundation (the Clinton's pockets) when everything is private and off the record. Being SOS at the time is irrelevant - all those foreigners have big hearts to go along with big wallets.

(03-03-2015 11:05 AM)Crebman Wrote:  It's much easier to solicit donations to the Clinton Foundation (the Clinton's pockets) when everything is private and off the record. Being SOS at the time is irrelevant - all those foreigners have big hearts to go along with big wallets.

And have expectations based on those donations.

(03-03-2015 11:07 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 11:05 AM)Crebman Wrote:  It's much easier to solicit donations to the Clinton Foundation (the Clinton's pockets) when everything is private and off the record. Being SOS at the time is irrelevant - all those foreigners have big hearts to go along with big wallets.

And have expectations based on those donations.

No way! All altruistic. Nothing compromised here.........run along.

She can't claim ignorance of the Law. She's a Lawyer and former "President"

hdr22@clintonemail.com

(03-03-2015 11:54 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  She can't claim ignorance of the Law. She's a Lawyer and former "President":lmfao:

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.. And I'm quoting a NY City Judge on this-- Ron White.

That is dumb. Unless there is something to hide, use the e-mails you are supposed to. No excuse!!

(03-03-2015 12:21 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  hdr22@clintonemail.com

(03-03-2015 12:23 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  That is dumb. Unless there is something to hide, use the e-mails you are supposed to. No excuse!!

Wanna bet the serfs in the Democratic party don't care one iota? For example, it wouldn't cause you to vote for whomever the Republican was instead of her, would it?

See, she could be filmed selling crack on a street corner and it wouldn't change the vote.