(02-09-2015 09:39 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:34 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:26 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 08:22 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 03:22 PM)Stammers Wrote:  I have to agree with this. Plus, scared to make a mistake Pookie is back.

Take a screen shot folks, hell hath frozen over.

I will agree or disagree with anyone.

Admitting you are wrong is an entirely different thing though.

I admit when I am and I'm certainly flexible when it comes to my opinions changing/evolving. I wouldn't insist that Iverson has a concussion for 6 weeks.

If so, it may have been "shaken baby syndrome" by the toddler school coach

"Kuran you have said two curse words simultaneously, you must go to timeout!"

KI; "No! I don't wanna go to timeout"!

JP; "Kuran, go to timeout now, or you will not participate in activities with the other kids".

KI; "You can't make me, you're not a real teacher anyway, you're just a substitute!"

JP; gets really heated.....grabs the child out of rage....frustration.....embarrassment. ......and feeling of losing control....grabs the toddler...and no shakes him out of rage.....

Daycare fearing legal action deem the incident as a concussion but have paid out the family and victim to not speak publicly about incident
Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(02-09-2015 09:34 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:26 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 08:22 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 03:22 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 01:18 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  What must go though a players head when he (Pookie) gets beaten out by a guy (Kedren) who in the previous two games just went 4-12 (2-7 from three) and had 5 turnovers to 4 assists.

Meanwhile, in those SAME two games, Pookie had gone 3-8 from the field (2-4 from three) with 10 assists and 2 turnovers.

I have to agree with this. Plus, scared to make a mistake Pookie is back.

Take a screen shot folks, hell hath frozen over.

I will agree or disagree with anyone.

Admitting you are wrong is an entirely different thing though.

Boom!

(02-10-2015 09:50 AM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:34 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:26 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 08:22 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 03:22 PM)Stammers Wrote:  I have to agree with this. Plus, scared to make a mistake Pookie is back.

Take a screen shot folks, hell hath frozen over.

I will agree or disagree with anyone.

Admitting you are wrong is an entirely different thing though.

Boom!

I would love to take your word for it, but feel free to supply a link showing where you have ever admitted to being wrong about anything.

(02-08-2015 04:24 PM)MemphisTiger15 Wrote:  He called that last timeout so he could draw up that solid play of Avery Woodson bricking a 22 ft fade away

We scored, or got a good shot on several of the posessions coming out of time-outs. I was trying to pay attention to this since that issue has come up before on this board.

And... even if we had a time out left, you don't call it after Kendren hits a shot with 7 seconds to go. All that does is gives Temple time to draw up a play.

(02-10-2015 10:38 AM)CKMcDan Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 04:24 PM)MemphisTiger15 Wrote:  He called that last timeout so he could draw up that solid play of Avery Woodson bricking a 22 ft fade away

We scored, or got a good shot on several of the posessions coming out of time-outs. I was trying to pay attention to this since that issue has come up before on this board.

And... even if we had a time out left, you don't call it after Kendren hits a shot with 7 seconds to go. All that does is gives Temple time to draw up a play.

On the other hand, a TO at this time also gives you time to settle your guys, set up the defense and go over what to do and what not to do.

(02-10-2015 10:43 AM)airric2255 Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 10:38 AM)CKMcDan Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 04:24 PM)MemphisTiger15 Wrote:  He called that last timeout so he could draw up that solid play of Avery Woodson bricking a 22 ft fade away

We scored, or got a good shot on several of the posessions coming out of time-outs. I was trying to pay attention to this since that issue has come up before on this board.

And... even if we had a time out left, you don't call it after Kendren hits a shot with 7 seconds to go. All that does is gives Temple time to draw up a play.

On the other hand, a TO at this time also gives you time to settle your guys, set up the defense and go over what to do and what not to do.

Bottom line, you never want to be out of timeouts in a one possession ball game in the final 60 seconds.

There was no pressing reason to call the timeout with 1:20 to go when the shot clock is fresh and when the bench can call over the PG to call a play from the same side of the court.

(02-10-2015 10:38 AM)CKMcDan Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 04:24 PM)MemphisTiger15 Wrote:  He called that last timeout so he could draw up that solid play of Avery Woodson bricking a 22 ft fade away

We scored, or got a good shot on several of the posessions coming out of time-outs. I was trying to pay attention to this since that issue has come up before on this board.

And... even if we had a time out left, you don't call it after Kendren hits a shot with 7 seconds to go. All that does is gives Temple time to draw up a play.

When you have a team that consistently gives up open shots in transition, then I think the better strategy is to use a timeout to set-up your defense.

(02-10-2015 09:58 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 09:50 AM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:34 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:26 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 08:22 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  Take a screen shot folks, hell hath frozen over.

I will agree or disagree with anyone.

Admitting you are wrong is an entirely different thing though.

Boom!

I would love to take your word for it, but feel free to supply a link showing where you have ever admitted to being wrong about anything.

Does this PM to ericsrevenge76 count?

Re: I'm sorry

Mick Light Wrote:

Dear ericsrevenge76,

I feel I owe you a personal apology for my insensitive comment on the message board yesterday. I know these days since John's funeral have been very difficult for you, and I was clearly out of order in making reference to "teams not in the Top 25 although they won the National Championship." I'm sorry you had to suffer from my foolishness.

I hope you will be able to forgive me. I have tremendous respect for you and your abilities, and I hope we can continue to work well together. I'm terribly sorry.

Mick

(02-10-2015 02:01 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 09:58 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 09:50 AM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:34 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:26 PM)Stammers Wrote:  I will agree or disagree with anyone.

Admitting you are wrong is an entirely different thing though.

Boom!

I would love to take your word for it, but feel free to supply a link showing where you have ever admitted to being wrong about anything.

Does this PM to ericsrevenge76 count?

Re: I'm sorry

Mick Light Wrote:

Dear ericsrevenge76,

I feel I owe you a personal apology for my insensitive comment on the message board yesterday. I know these days since John's funeral have been very difficult for you, and I was clearly out of order in making reference to "teams not in the Top 25 although they won the National Championship." I'm sorry you had to suffer from my foolishness.

I hope you will be able to forgive me. I have tremendous respect for you and your abilities, and I hope we can continue to work well together. I'm terribly sorry.

Mick

That was well worded, and I know PMs are private, but don't leave us hanging....did Eric accept or not?

(02-10-2015 02:16 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:01 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 09:58 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 09:50 AM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 09:34 PM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  Admitting you are wrong is an entirely different thing though.

Boom!

I would love to take your word for it, but feel free to supply a link showing where you have ever admitted to being wrong about anything.

Does this PM to ericsrevenge76 count?

Re: I'm sorry

Mick Light Wrote:

Dear ericsrevenge76,

I feel I owe you a personal apology for my insensitive comment on the message board yesterday. I know these days since John's funeral have been very difficult for you, and I was clearly out of order in making reference to "teams not in the Top 25 although they won the National Championship." I'm sorry you had to suffer from my foolishness.

I hope you will be able to forgive me. I have tremendous respect for you and your abilities, and I hope we can continue to work well together. I'm terribly sorry.

Mick

That was well worded, and I know PMs are private, but don't leave us hanging....did Eric accept or not?

They are, indeed, private thus I did not post his response.

Perhaps ericsrevenge76 will happen upon this post and not only qualify it's authenticity but also to supply you with your request for his acceptability.

(02-10-2015 02:27 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:16 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:01 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 09:58 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 09:50 AM)Mick Light Wrote:  Boom!

I would love to take your word for it, but feel free to supply a link showing where you have ever admitted to being wrong about anything.

Does this PM to ericsrevenge76 count?

Re: I'm sorry

Mick Light Wrote:

Dear ericsrevenge76,

I feel I owe you a personal apology for my insensitive comment on the message board yesterday. I know these days since John's funeral have been very difficult for you, and I was clearly out of order in making reference to "teams not in the Top 25 although they won the National Championship." I'm sorry you had to suffer from my foolishness.

I hope you will be able to forgive me. I have tremendous respect for you and your abilities, and I hope we can continue to work well together. I'm terribly sorry.

Mick

That was well worded, and I know PMs are private, but don't leave us hanging....did Eric accept or not?

They are, indeed, private thus I did not post his response.

Perhaps ericsrevenge76 will happen upon this post and not only qualify it's authenticity but also to supply you with your request for his acceptability.

This new personality your displaying is very commendable, Micky, even though it's going to take some getting used to. lol

(02-10-2015 02:36 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:27 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:16 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:01 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 09:58 AM)Stammers Wrote:  I would love to take your word for it, but feel free to supply a link showing where you have ever admitted to being wrong about anything.

Does this PM to ericsrevenge76 count?

Re: I'm sorry

Mick Light Wrote:

Dear ericsrevenge76,

I feel I owe you a personal apology for my insensitive comment on the message board yesterday. I know these days since John's funeral have been very difficult for you, and I was clearly out of order in making reference to "teams not in the Top 25 although they won the National Championship." I'm sorry you had to suffer from my foolishness.

I hope you will be able to forgive me. I have tremendous respect for you and your abilities, and I hope we can continue to work well together. I'm terribly sorry.

Mick

That was well worded, and I know PMs are private, but don't leave us hanging....did Eric accept or not?

They are, indeed, private thus I did not post his response.

Perhaps ericsrevenge76 will happen upon this post and not only qualify it's authenticity but also to supply you with your request for his acceptability.

This new personality your displaying is very commendable, Micky, even though it's going to take some getting used to. lol

I wear many hats.

Some say it's personalities.

You be the judge.

(02-10-2015 02:47 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:36 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:27 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:16 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:01 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  Does this PM to ericsrevenge76 count?

Re: I'm sorry

Mick Light Wrote:

Dear ericsrevenge76,

I feel I owe you a personal apology for my insensitive comment on the message board yesterday. I know these days since John's funeral have been very difficult for you, and I was clearly out of order in making reference to "teams not in the Top 25 although they won the National Championship." I'm sorry you had to suffer from my foolishness.

I hope you will be able to forgive me. I have tremendous respect for you and your abilities, and I hope we can continue to work well together. I'm terribly sorry.

Mick

That was well worded, and I know PMs are private, but don't leave us hanging....did Eric accept or not?

They are, indeed, private thus I did not post his response.

Perhaps ericsrevenge76 will happen upon this post and not only qualify it's authenticity but also to supply you with your request for his acceptability.

This new personality your displaying is very commendable, Micky, even though it's going to take some getting used to. lol

I wear many hats.

Some say it's personalities.

You be the judge.

unh-uh. I'm not being the judge. It's your idea. You be the judge.

There must have been a door there in the wall when we all came in...lol.

(02-10-2015 05:39 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:47 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:36 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:27 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:16 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  That was well worded, and I know PMs are private, but don't leave us hanging....did Eric accept or not?

They are, indeed, private thus I did not post his response.

Perhaps ericsrevenge76 will happen upon this post and not only qualify it's authenticity but also to supply you with your request for his acceptability.

This new personality your displaying is very commendable, Micky, even though it's going to take some getting used to. lol

I wear many hats.

Some say it's personalities.

You be the judge.

unh-uh. I'm not being the judge. It's your idea. You be the judge.

There must have been a door there in the wall when we all came in...lol.

Remember Da Judge Firebirds? I didn't like em.

(02-10-2015 05:41 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 05:39 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:47 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:36 PM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(02-10-2015 02:27 PM)Mick Light Wrote:  They are, indeed, private thus I did not post his response.

Perhaps ericsrevenge76 will happen upon this post and not only qualify it's authenticity but also to supply you with your request for his acceptability.

This new personality your displaying is very commendable, Micky, even though it's going to take some getting used to. lol

I wear many hats.

Some say it's personalities.

You be the judge.

unh-uh. I'm not being the judge. It's your idea. You be the judge.

There must have been a door there in the wall when we all came in...lol.

Remember Da Judge Firebirds? I didn't like em.

I don't think I ever knew 'em....Or they must've taken my marbles away.

(02-08-2015 03:42 PM)JTS Wrote:  Started the second half with a double digit lead, blew it, sad.

That never happens to good teams , right ?