(02-09-2015 02:52 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 02:50 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  If he goes to jail, I wonder if he'll go to the female or male facility. Ugh, what a nasty POS.

It's California - they probably have jails just for the undecideds or in betweens.

And to think, even THEY didn't want gay marriage until the courts overruled it. You know you're in the minority when even the citizens of California shoot your crying down.

(02-09-2015 02:57 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 02:07 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 01:27 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 01:28 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  I can't joke about the car crash. Jenner rear ended a car stopped at a red light and knocked it into traffic, where it was hit and the poor lady driving the car was killed. Jenner has a lot more to worry about today than becoming a woman. Sad story.

I'm not sure if there's anything he could've done about it. Apparently there was one car stopped in the middle of the road where it should not have been. Another car rear ended the first. Jenner's truck rear ended the second, propelled it into oncoming traffic where it was hit by a Hummer H2, killing the driver of the second car.

I guess that no matter what happens in front of you, you shouldn't rear end a car you are following, but he was not the cause of the initial accident.

According to the news I had to hear about it (because I didn't have the remote close), they think he may have been texting and driving and forced the old lady into oncoming traffic due to not paying attention to the road. Plus texting and driving is against the law now.

It could be that all four cars are at fault. It could be that only one of them is really at fault. I think they mentioned that they would pull the phone records of all parties. The actual evidence at this time seems very week to me (paparazzi photos that don't even show a phone, just a hand... and, from the reflection on his bumper, it looks like it was taken while he was stopped at a light).

When you rear end someone, especially at a traffic light that's red, you weren't paying attention. He was probably daydreaming about how to make his mangina tight.

(02-09-2015 03:53 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 03:29 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 01:12 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:47 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:02 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Those are things he had no business speaking about. He shouldn't concern himself with things in the past like that, and especially shouldn't compare them to things today.

Yes because no one wants to bring those days back right?

You trolling or serious?

That post and your sig pic= irony.

It's not my fault you're ignorant to one of the best movies ever made and equivocate it to trolling.

When you write things like "shouldn't concern himself with things in the past" yet yourself yearn for the past, I just find that ironic.

(02-09-2015 04:11 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 03:53 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 03:29 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 01:12 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:47 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Yes because no one wants to bring those days back right?

You trolling or serious?

That post and your sig pic= irony.

It's not my fault you're ignorant to one of the best movies ever made and equivocate it to trolling.

When you write things like "shouldn't concern himself with things in the past" yet yourself yearn for the past, I just find that ironic.

It's a quote from one of my favorite classic movies, along with a picture of a Confederate Ball that was painted for the GwtW art gallery. And I'm not the POTUSA that has to speak to 330 million Americans. He shouldn't concern himself with race and pick sides. He's supposed to be the race war ender and only makes it worse.

(02-09-2015 03:59 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 02:52 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 02:50 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  If he goes to jail, I wonder if he'll go to the female or male facility. Ugh, what a nasty POS.

It's California - they probably have jails just for the undecideds or in betweens.

And to think, even THEY didn't want gay marriage until the courts overruled it. You know you're in the minority when even the citizens of California shoot your crying down.

Courts? As in plural? I believe it was one lone single solitary judge and he was a gay judge.

(02-09-2015 03:10 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Wait, so the car driven by the lady who was killed was trying to make an illegal turn across traffic?

Not the lady who was killed, but the car in front of her was inexplicably stopped. So, car A was stopped. Car B ran into car A. Jenner (car C) ran into car B. The driver of car B was killed when B went into oncoming traffic and was hit by car D (Hummer).

A - Prius (out of frame below)
B - Lexus (white car)
C - Escalade with Trailer (right of frame)
D - Hummer (top of frame)


Bruce Jenner crash investigation focuses on cellphone records - The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/earl...e-records/ Wrote:Jenner was smoking, not texting, when the accident occurred on the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu, according to TMZ, and officials told the Los Angeles Times that no paparazzi were involved in the chain-reaction crash. Jenner, whose reported transition from male to female has drawn increasing coverage, was being followed by photographers, but L.A. County sheriff’s Sgt. Philip Brooks told the Times that it was doubtful he was attempting to elude them. The Times reports:

Quote:A woman driving northbound in a Toyota Prius slowed down or stopped for reasons that were unclear. A woman driving a Lexus sedan rear-ended the Prius.

Jenner, who was driving a black Cadillac Escalade sport utility vehicle that was hauling a trailer carrying an off-road vehicle, then rear-ended the Lexus.

The impact propelled the Lexus into oncoming traffic, where a Hummer traveling southbound slammed into the Lexus. The driver of the Lexus, whom authorities declined to identify, died at the scene. Both the front and rear ends of the Lexus were severely damaged.

(02-09-2015 04:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  When you rear end someone, especially at a traffic light that's red, you weren't paying attention. He was probably daydreaming about how to make his mangina tight.

If you rear end someone that went from 40 to zero because of a collision, it's hard to conceive that you are at fault (at least from a driver's perspective... there's no defending trying to become the biggest whore in the Kardashian family).

(02-09-2015 06:42 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 03:10 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Wait, so the car driven by the lady who was killed was trying to make an illegal turn across traffic?

Not the lady who was killed, but the car in front of her was inexplicably stopped. So, car A was stopped. Car B ran into car A. Jenner (car C) ran into car B. The driver of car B was killed when B went into oncoming traffic and was hit by car D (Hummer).

A - Prius (out of frame below)
B - Lexus (white car)
C - Escalade with Trailer (right of frame)
D - Hummer (top of frame)


Bruce Jenner crash investigation focuses on cellphone records - The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/earl...e-records/ Wrote:Jenner was smoking, not texting, when the accident occurred on the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu, according to TMZ, and officials told the Los Angeles Times that no paparazzi were involved in the chain-reaction crash. Jenner, whose reported transition from male to female has drawn increasing coverage, was being followed by photographers, but L.A. County sheriff’s Sgt. Philip Brooks told the Times that it was doubtful he was attempting to elude them. The Times reports:

Quote:A woman driving northbound in a Toyota Prius slowed down or stopped for reasons that were unclear. A woman driving a Lexus sedan rear-ended the Prius.

Jenner, who was driving a black Cadillac Escalade sport utility vehicle that was hauling a trailer carrying an off-road vehicle, then rear-ended the Lexus.

The impact propelled the Lexus into oncoming traffic, where a Hummer traveling southbound slammed into the Lexus. The driver of the Lexus, whom authorities declined to identify, died at the scene. Both the front and rear ends of the Lexus were severely damaged.

(02-09-2015 04:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  When you rear end someone, especially at a traffic light that's red, you weren't paying attention. He was probably daydreaming about how to make his mangina tight.

If you rear end someone that went from 40 to zero because of a collision, it's hard to conceive that you are at fault (at least from a driver's perspective... there's no defending trying to become the biggest whore in the Kardashian family).

I must not be following because for some reason that doesn't make sense to me. If Car B ran into Car A and then was rear-ended how was Car B thrown into traffic and yet Car A wasn't?

Or am I missing what happened? If not, doesn't that seem really strange?

(02-09-2015 07:01 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 06:42 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 03:10 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Wait, so the car driven by the lady who was killed was trying to make an illegal turn across traffic?

Not the lady who was killed, but the car in front of her was inexplicably stopped. So, car A was stopped. Car B ran into car A. Jenner (car C) ran into car B. The driver of car B was killed when B went into oncoming traffic and was hit by car D (Hummer).

A - Prius (out of frame below)
B - Lexus (white car)
C - Escalade with Trailer (right of frame)
D - Hummer (top of frame)


Bruce Jenner crash investigation focuses on cellphone records - The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/earl...e-records/ Wrote:Jenner was smoking, not texting, when the accident occurred on the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu, according to TMZ, and officials told the Los Angeles Times that no paparazzi were involved in the chain-reaction crash. Jenner, whose reported transition from male to female has drawn increasing coverage, was being followed by photographers, but L.A. County sheriff’s Sgt. Philip Brooks told the Times that it was doubtful he was attempting to elude them. The Times reports:

Quote:A woman driving northbound in a Toyota Prius slowed down or stopped for reasons that were unclear. A woman driving a Lexus sedan rear-ended the Prius.

Jenner, who was driving a black Cadillac Escalade sport utility vehicle that was hauling a trailer carrying an off-road vehicle, then rear-ended the Lexus.

The impact propelled the Lexus into oncoming traffic, where a Hummer traveling southbound slammed into the Lexus. The driver of the Lexus, whom authorities declined to identify, died at the scene. Both the front and rear ends of the Lexus were severely damaged.

(02-09-2015 04:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  When you rear end someone, especially at a traffic light that's red, you weren't paying attention. He was probably daydreaming about how to make his mangina tight.

If you rear end someone that went from 40 to zero because of a collision, it's hard to conceive that you are at fault (at least from a driver's perspective... there's no defending trying to become the biggest whore in the Kardashian family).

I must not be following because for some reason that doesn't make sense to me. If Car B ran into Car A and then was rear-ended how was Car B thrown into traffic and yet Car A wasn't?

Or am I missing what happened? If not, doesn't that seem really strange?

Car A may have driven off after being rear-ended by Car B.

And Car B may have been angled to the left (oncoming) lanes when it was rear-ended by Car C.

the only funny part leftover is y'alls hickory-dick'n-of-the-dock of who gives two shites.....

jfc......

there really is a reason I love this board.....

I guess the sex change may be making him a bad driver.

(02-09-2015 02:50 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  It was probably lighting the cigarette up, not paying attention.

More probable is that he was putting on eye liner or lipstick.

(02-09-2015 12:49 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

Quote:Is anyone else worried about Bruce Jenner?

No.

This.

(02-09-2015 08:17 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:49 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

Quote:Is anyone else worried about Bruce Jenner?

No.

This.

73 posts about Bruce Jenner? On a site with just guys?

(02-09-2015 08:21 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 08:17 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:49 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

Quote:Is anyone else worried about Bruce Jenner?

No.

This.

73 posts about Bruce Jenner? On a site with just guys?

What's wrong with that? Guys always talk about women.

(02-09-2015 08:24 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 08:21 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 08:17 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:49 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

Quote:Is anyone else worried about Bruce Jenner?

No.

This.

73 posts about Bruce Jenner? On a site with just guys?

What's wrong with that? Guys always talk about women.

As long as we don't rate him, one to ten.