(02-01-2015 03:20 PM)PirateJim Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:19 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:18 PM)PirateJim Wrote:  AAC is a one team league for the NCAA tournament and that's only because they have to take one. You better win the conference tournament or you are going to the NIT. IMO.

Well your opinion is wrong :). IMHO

I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Cincy's RPI is still 34 after the loss, I don't think they are on the bubble yet, but probably bumped them to a 10 or 11 seed. Tulsa is on an 11 game win streak and SMU is on an 8 game win streak. We will have at least 3 teams in the tourney.

(02-01-2015 03:24 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:20 PM)bearcatfan Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:14 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  Poor UC fans. They lost to bad OVC team who didn't even play well. Grow a sack, we scored 50 which is going to give you at least a 50% chance to beat Cincy.

There is no need for that.

Whoa, now. I can certainly go pick out some quotes that were apparently needed when Cincinnati beat ECU.

We didn't play well. Whisnant, and White both had their worst games of the year. Tyson stepped up, as did Guilmette. We out hustled UC, and outplayed UC, plain and simple.

Yes you did - so leave it at that.

(02-01-2015 03:18 PM)PirateJim Wrote:  AAC is a one team league for the NCAA tournament and that's only because they have to take one. You better win the conference tournament or you are going to the NIT. IMO.

Hahaha you obviously know NOTHING about CBB.

(02-01-2015 03:18 PM)PirateJim Wrote:  AAC is a one team league for the NCAA tournament and that's only because they have to take one. You better win the conference tournament or you are going to the NIT. IMO.

Your probably right, the loss to ECU clearly shows it.

(02-01-2015 03:26 PM)NewEnglandBull Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:18 PM)PirateJim Wrote:  AAC is a one team league for the NCAA tournament and that's only because they have to take one. You better win the conference tournament or you are going to the NIT. IMO.

Hahaha you obviously know NOTHING about CBB.

What do you think? If you say more than two, then you are out of your mind.

(02-01-2015 03:52 PM)PirateJim Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:26 PM)NewEnglandBull Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:18 PM)PirateJim Wrote:  AAC is a one team league for the NCAA tournament and that's only because they have to take one. You better win the conference tournament or you are going to the NIT. IMO.

Hahaha you obviously know NOTHING about CBB.

What do you think? If you say more than two, then you are out of your mind.

3 minimum and I have all of my faculties!!

(02-01-2015 03:08 PM)laser101 Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:05 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:04 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Where are those other Cincinnati fans that talked crap about ECU last month?

I don't know but they need to man up.

Great win for ECU, congratulations.

Thanks man...good game

(02-01-2015 03:07 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:05 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 03:04 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Where are those other Cincinnati fans that talked crap about ECU last month?

I don't know but they need to man up.

Man up about what? We lost. Not scoring a field goal in the last 8.5 minutes is absolutely pathetic.

17-4 run to end the game to a team with an rpi over 250? Mind numbing loss and just ruined the Super Bowl for me.... Ugh.

It was aimed at certain Cinci fans talking trash in other threads about how awful ECU basketball is and then not saying congrats after ECU pulled the big upset. I congratulated you guys after you beat us in that incredible football game last year...

  ImageUploadedByTapatalk1422825507.529018.jpg (Size: 99.55 KB / Downloads: 22)


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

(02-01-2015 04:23 PM)PurpleReigns2012 Wrote:  Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Like the Tacko reference thrown in there.

UCONN down by 15 mid way through the second half... Not good for the AAC as a whole.

(02-01-2015 04:32 PM)T-Town Cane Wrote:  UCONN down by 15 mid way through the second half... Not good for the AAC as a whole.

Meh. UCONN would've had to run the table which would've probably had knocked someone else out anyway.

Good game Pirates, your team played hard and smart down the stretch. I do not think this will kill UCs tournament hopes. I'm surprised we are still so inconsistent game to game though, but it is what it is.

(02-01-2015 04:33 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(02-01-2015 04:32 PM)T-Town Cane Wrote:  UCONN down by 15 mid way through the second half... Not good for the AAC as a whole.

Meh. UCONN would've had to run the table which would've probably had knocked someone else out anyway.

I'm not saying they would have made the tourney, but them loosing will makes it tougher for us to get 3 teams in.

They must not be an NCAA team if they're losing to UH. Then again last year, they lost here and it led to a national title, so maybe it'll be a spark.

you know what would make this not matter to Tulsa fans....

beating Houston and UCONN

(02-01-2015 03:18 PM)PirateJim Wrote:  AAC is a one team league for the NCAA tournament and that's only because they have to take one. You better win the conference tournament or you are going to the NIT. IMO.

At this point, there is no denying the truth in this.

Houston is trying to Coog it out there

its embarasing the lack of student support at houston, the wife asked me wtf do i tell her

Everyone is just worn out from the lack of good coaching these last 20 years or so, except for the Penders era when he teased the fans with the prospect of getting an at-large bid every season before succumbing to one too many bad losses.