It’s not like two NYPD officers were shot just last night. Obama's trusted adviser no less....

Quote: Now that two slain cops have been buried, the Rev. Al Sharpton plans to resume kicking dirt on the NYPD.

The head of the Staten Island chapter of Sharpton’s National Action Network said anti-cop protesters would return to the borough’s state courthouse on Tuesday.

Cynthia Davis said NAN suspended its twice-weekly demonstrations out of respect to slain cops Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu and their families.

Ramos and Liu were assassinated on Dec. 20 by a gunman who wrote online that he wanted to avenge the uncharged police killings of Eric Garner in Staten Island and Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo.

“We were not going to protest before those officers were laid to rest properly, and unlike the police officers who decided to take protests to a funeral, we had much more respect than that,” Davis said.

She said the courthouse protests would continue “until we feel like we have gotten justice” in the Garner case, in which a grand jury declined to indict cop Daniel Pantaleo.

http://nypost.com/2015/01/06/with-cops-l...-protests/

It's going to be cold as a son of a ***** this week in NYC!

So ERC, when should one be allowed to exercise their constitutional rights? And who makes that decision?

(01-06-2015 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So ERC, when should one be allowed to exercise their constitutional rights? And who makes that decision?

Where did I say he didn't have a right to the protests? You are inventing words that don't exist. Nothing new to that for libs. Now, if he has the right to protest, I also possess the right to criticize his protests while making people aware of them. Or are you saying I don't? See I am used to hypocrisy on the left, so it doesn't surprise me.

Did or did you not type this?:

Quote:It’s not like two NYPD officers were shot just last night.

You're clearly implying that he should not protest because some criminal shot at police officers, a likely daily occurrence in the United States, in a totally unrelated incident to what they're protesting.

And in your thread title, please explain how these are "anti-police" protests.

If you protest an action by a certain individual, that in no way equates to you not wanting that person to either exist or merely do his job. That's a false narrative that the right has used for years.

(01-06-2015 03:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Did or did you not type this?:

Quote:It’s not like two NYPD officers were shot just last night.

You're clearly implying that he should not protest because some criminal shot at police officers, a likely daily occurrence in the United States, in a totally unrelated incident to what they're protesting.

I implied no such thing. Provide the proof to back that claim up. Easy, you can't. I implied that starting his protests the day after two more NYPD officers were shot in the line of duty is despicable. His protests are anti-police. That is not implied, but fact. Only a leftist like you would see it any other way.

(01-06-2015 03:36 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(01-06-2015 03:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Did or did you not type this?:

Quote:It’s not like two NYPD officers were shot just last night.

You're clearly implying that he should not protest because some criminal shot at police officers, a likely daily occurrence in the United States, in a totally unrelated incident to what they're protesting.

I implied no such thing. Provide the proof to back that claim up. Easy, you can't. I implied that starting his protests the day after two more NYPD officers were shot in the line of duty is despicable. His protests are anti-police. That is not implied, but fact. Only a leftist like you would see it any other way.

There is no point continuing to discuss anything with someone so purposely obtuse as yourself.