Nor is a block in the back

(12-31-2014 04:51 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  So are you guys conflicted?

On the one hand sticking it to the P5 is delicious. OTOH, it is Boise St and the MWC that will get the credit.

Everyone knows it's Boise then everyone else in the MWC. Whatever little credit is given, Boise will get it.

(12-31-2014 08:30 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 04:51 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  So are you guys conflicted?

On the one hand sticking it to the P5 is delicious. OTOH, it is Boise St and the MWC that will get the credit.

Everyone knows it's Boise then everyone else in the MWC. Whatever little credit is given, Boise will get it.

I understand what you are saying, and if Boise continues to rep the G5 and continues to win the game, it will be a problem...but for right now, after a year in which many argued the G5 didn't deserve a New Years 6 spot period. Its better off for Boise to win, so more people will believe that the G5 champion is worthy.

(12-31-2014 08:30 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 04:51 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  So are you guys conflicted?

On the one hand sticking it to the P5 is delicious. OTOH, it is Boise St and the MWC that will get the credit.

Everyone knows it's Boise then everyone else in the MWC. Whatever little credit is given, Boise will get it.

You are right, very little credit will be given to Boise for this win, though they do deserve it. What I love about this board is that the same posters who post about the MWC sucking will be beating the drum about adding 4 to 6 of their teams to the AAC tomorrow.

(12-31-2014 08:37 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 08:30 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 04:51 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  So are you guys conflicted?

On the one hand sticking it to the P5 is delicious. OTOH, it is Boise St and the MWC that will get the credit.

Everyone knows it's Boise then everyone else in the MWC. Whatever little credit is given, Boise will get it.

I understand what you are saying, and if Boise continues to rep the G5 and continues to win the game, it will be a problem...but for right now, after a year in which many argued the G5 didn't deserve a New Years 6 spot period. Its better off for Boise to win, so more people will believe that the G5 champion is worthy.

Agreed.

(12-31-2014 05:07 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Boise should be in our conference. Having a MWC & AAC hurts all of the upper level G5 schools.

We need to be the Borg* and assimilate Boise, Fresno, SDSU, & Colorado State ... assuming that Air Force, Army, & BYU are not interested.


* Star Trek reference

East of the Mississippi:

UConn
Temple
Cincinnati
ECU
Memphis
USF
UCF
Tulane

West of the Mississippi:

Tulsa
SMU
Houston
Colorado State
Boise State
Fresno State
SDSU
Navy

(12-31-2014 07:44 PM)BlueRaiderBoy Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 05:04 PM)Chappy Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 05:02 PM)leapinggazelle Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 04:56 PM)Chappy Wrote:  I'm not conflicted at all.

Seeing the committee not even rank a G5 school most of the season makes me want to see Boise State win by 50.

Who exactly deserved to be ranked from the G5 during the season? All except ECU and CSU failed miserably OOC.

Colorado State, Boise, heck even Marshall.

Now that wasn't so hard to admit, was it? THEY STILL DESERVE TO BE RANKED!

No they don't. They lost, now back to the rabbit hole of whereversville Tenessee

(12-31-2014 05:55 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote:  AAC and MWC just needs to merge. Yes I am torn. On one hand, I like Boise and want them to run it up. On the other hand it will elevate the MWC and make them more of a competition for AAC in the future for access bowls, if they weren't already.

The Old C-USA/MWC Alliance talk a couple of years ago makes so much since now between the AAC/MWC...going forward maybe something both leagues should look into...

(12-31-2014 08:30 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 04:51 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  So are you guys conflicted?

On the one hand sticking it to the P5 is delicious. OTOH, it is Boise St and the MWC that will get the credit.

Everyone knows it's Boise then everyone else in the MWC. Whatever little credit is given, Boise will get it.

Can't say that....UCF and Cincinnati and others in the AAC have a say...if ECU would have handled business they had the early inside track for that spot.