UofMstateU
Legend
Posts: 39,084
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 3551
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
|
RE: Playoff to expose weak BIG 10
(01-17-2015 04:56 PM)AntiG Wrote: (01-17-2015 04:34 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: (01-16-2015 09:27 PM)AntiG Wrote: (12-30-2014 09:13 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: The B10 has been getting exposed in bowl games for years. I doubt this year is any different.
O rly
Yes really. Would you like me to post the absolutely pathetic post season records for the B10, or would you like for me to start with the horridly abysmal BCS bowl record? Your choice.
Ohio St had a good run at the end, and was fortunate to have an NFL caliber quarterback as their 3rd string. But this year does not change historical fact. And the historical fact is that the B10 sucks in the post season. They just didnt suck this year. Get back to me when they pull this off again.
well your point in the beginning was proved wrong. doesn't matter what happens next year, your bitterness just comes right through.
So you agree that the B10 had been getting exposed repeatedly in the past, and I agree that this one year they didnt. I'm ok with that.
|
|
01-18-2015 12:33 PM |
|
AntiG
1st String
Posts: 1,396
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Rutgers
Location: NYC
|
RE: Playoff to expose weak BIG 10
(01-18-2015 12:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: (01-17-2015 04:56 PM)AntiG Wrote: (01-17-2015 04:34 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: (01-16-2015 09:27 PM)AntiG Wrote: (12-30-2014 09:13 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: The B10 has been getting exposed in bowl games for years. I doubt this year is any different.
O rly
Yes really. Would you like me to post the absolutely pathetic post season records for the B10, or would you like for me to start with the horridly abysmal BCS bowl record? Your choice.
Ohio St had a good run at the end, and was fortunate to have an NFL caliber quarterback as their 3rd string. But this year does not change historical fact. And the historical fact is that the B10 sucks in the post season. They just didnt suck this year. Get back to me when they pull this off again.
well your point in the beginning was proved wrong. doesn't matter what happens next year, your bitterness just comes right through.
So you agree that the B10 had been getting exposed repeatedly in the past, and I agree that this one year they didnt. I'm ok with that.
Doesn't really bother me because its certainly true that the B1G hasn't been particularly strong over the past decade outside of Ohio State. Michigan State was awesome last year though, and Wisconsin has been consistently excellent as well. But this year (which is what was funny about your thread starter), and the next few years coming up, the conference will continue to strengthen due to Harbaugh joining Michigan, Penn State's improved recruiting and Rutgers starting to really win over NJ's own recruits.
By the end of the season, B1G had a strong argument for being the premier conference for football in 2014, while the SEC and ACC (outside of Ga Tech) got massively exposed. The Big 12 continues to be underrated as always (they've really been the 2nd best football conference for the past decade) and the Pac 12 is still a so-so power conference, ahead of the ACC.
|
|
01-19-2015 01:42 AM |
|
shere khan
Southerner
Posts: 60,509
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7458
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Teh transfer portal
|
Re: RE: Playoff to expose weak BIG 10
(01-19-2015 01:42 AM)AntiG Wrote: (01-18-2015 12:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: (01-17-2015 04:56 PM)AntiG Wrote: (01-17-2015 04:34 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: (01-16-2015 09:27 PM)AntiG Wrote: O rly
Yes really. Would you like me to post the absolutely pathetic post season records for the B10, or would you like for me to start with the horridly abysmal BCS bowl record? Your choice.
Ohio St had a good run at the end, and was fortunate to have an NFL caliber quarterback as their 3rd string. But this year does not change historical fact. And the historical fact is that the B10 sucks in the post season. They just didnt suck this year. Get back to me when they pull this off again.
well your point in the beginning was proved wrong. doesn't matter what happens next year, your bitterness just comes right through.
So you agree that the B10 had been getting exposed repeatedly in the past, and I agree that this one year they didnt. I'm ok with that.
Doesn't really bother me because its certainly true that the B1G hasn't been particularly strong over the past decade outside of Ohio State. Michigan State was awesome last year though, and Wisconsin has been consistently excellent as well. But this year (which is what was funny about your thread starter), and the next few years coming up, the conference will continue to strengthen due to Harbaugh joining Michigan, Penn State's improved recruiting and Rutgers starting to really win over NJ's own recruits.
By the end of the season, B1G had a strong argument for being the premier conference for football in 2014, while the SEC and ACC (outside of Ga Tech) got massively exposed. The Big 12 continues to be underrated as always (they've really been the 2nd best football conference for the past decade) and the Pac 12 is still a so-so power conference, ahead of the ACC.
One touchdown over bama and a field goal dink off the upright in ot against Auburn is not massive exposure
Miss and miss state were pretenders and fed a narrative for espn. Let the big ten win 3 or 4 in row and then you have a case
Excluding gatech, fsu and Clemson. The acc is a league of weak sisters.
Auburn is gonna commit crimes against nature when they play louiseville to open the season
All the old big East schools are the ones that really got exposed.
|
|
01-19-2015 11:31 AM |
|
shere khan
Southerner
Posts: 60,509
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7458
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Teh transfer portal
|
Re: RE: Playoff to expose weak BIG 10
(01-19-2015 11:31 AM)shere khan Wrote: (01-19-2015 01:42 AM)AntiG Wrote: (01-18-2015 12:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: (01-17-2015 04:56 PM)AntiG Wrote: (01-17-2015 04:34 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: Yes really. Would you like me to post the absolutely pathetic post season records for the B10, or would you like for me to start with the horridly abysmal BCS bowl record? Your choice.
Ohio St had a good run at the end, and was fortunate to have an NFL caliber quarterback as their 3rd string. But this year does not change historical fact. And the historical fact is that the B10 sucks in the post season. They just didnt suck this year. Get back to me when they pull this off again.
well your point in the beginning was proved wrong. doesn't matter what happens next year, your bitterness just comes right through.
So you agree that the B10 had been getting exposed repeatedly in the past, and I agree that this one year they didnt. I'm ok with that.
Doesn't really bother me because its certainly true that the B1G hasn't been particularly strong over the past decade outside of Ohio State. Michigan State was awesome last year though, and Wisconsin has been consistently excellent as well. But this year (which is what was funny about your thread starter), and the next few years coming up, the conference will continue to strengthen due to Harbaugh joining Michigan, Penn State's improved recruiting and Rutgers starting to really win over NJ's own recruits.
By the end of the season, B1G had a strong argument for being the premier conference for football in 2014, while the SEC and ACC (outside of Ga Tech) got massively exposed. The Big 12 continues to be underrated as always (they've really been the 2nd best football conference for the past decade) and the Pac 12 is still a so-so power conference, ahead of the ACC.
One touchdown over bama and a field goal dink off the upright in ot against Auburn is not massive exposure
Miss and miss state were pretenders and fed a narrative for espn. Let the big ten win 3 or 4 in row and then you have a case
Excluding gatech, fsu and Clemson. The acc is a league of weak sisters.
Auburn is gonna commit crimes against nature when they play louiseville to open the season
All the old big East schools are the ones that really got exposed.
Oh and Penn state can rot in hell
(This post was last modified: 01-19-2015 11:32 AM by shere khan.)
|
|
01-19-2015 11:32 AM |
|
DexterDevil
DCTID
Posts: 5,008
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 218
I Root For: EMU, DCFC
Location: Jackson, Mi
|
RE: Playoff to expose weak BIG 10
(01-19-2015 11:32 AM)shere khan Wrote: (01-19-2015 11:31 AM)shere khan Wrote: (01-19-2015 01:42 AM)AntiG Wrote: (01-18-2015 12:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: (01-17-2015 04:56 PM)AntiG Wrote: well your point in the beginning was proved wrong. doesn't matter what happens next year, your bitterness just comes right through.
So you agree that the B10 had been getting exposed repeatedly in the past, and I agree that this one year they didnt. I'm ok with that.
Doesn't really bother me because its certainly true that the B1G hasn't been particularly strong over the past decade outside of Ohio State. Michigan State was awesome last year though, and Wisconsin has been consistently excellent as well. But this year (which is what was funny about your thread starter), and the next few years coming up, the conference will continue to strengthen due to Harbaugh joining Michigan, Penn State's improved recruiting and Rutgers starting to really win over NJ's own recruits.
By the end of the season, B1G had a strong argument for being the premier conference for football in 2014, while the SEC and ACC (outside of Ga Tech) got massively exposed. The Big 12 continues to be underrated as always (they've really been the 2nd best football conference for the past decade) and the Pac 12 is still a so-so power conference, ahead of the ACC.
One touchdown over bama and a field goal dink off the upright in ot against Auburn is not massive exposure
Miss and miss state were pretenders and fed a narrative for espn. Let the big ten win 3 or 4 in row and then you have a case
Excluding gatech, fsu and Clemson. The acc is a league of weak sisters.
Auburn is gonna commit crimes against nature when they play louiseville to open the season
All the old big East schools are the ones that really got exposed.
Oh and Penn state can rot in hell
Can't say I disagree with that last statement.
|
|
01-19-2015 06:24 PM |
|
AntiG
1st String
Posts: 1,396
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Rutgers
Location: NYC
|
RE: Playoff to expose weak BIG 10
(01-19-2015 06:24 PM)DexterDevil Wrote: (01-19-2015 11:32 AM)shere khan Wrote: (01-19-2015 11:31 AM)shere khan Wrote: (01-19-2015 01:42 AM)AntiG Wrote: (01-18-2015 12:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: So you agree that the B10 had been getting exposed repeatedly in the past, and I agree that this one year they didnt. I'm ok with that.
Doesn't really bother me because its certainly true that the B1G hasn't been particularly strong over the past decade outside of Ohio State. Michigan State was awesome last year though, and Wisconsin has been consistently excellent as well. But this year (which is what was funny about your thread starter), and the next few years coming up, the conference will continue to strengthen due to Harbaugh joining Michigan, Penn State's improved recruiting and Rutgers starting to really win over NJ's own recruits.
By the end of the season, B1G had a strong argument for being the premier conference for football in 2014, while the SEC and ACC (outside of Ga Tech) got massively exposed. The Big 12 continues to be underrated as always (they've really been the 2nd best football conference for the past decade) and the Pac 12 is still a so-so power conference, ahead of the ACC.
One touchdown over bama and a field goal dink off the upright in ot against Auburn is not massive exposure
Miss and miss state were pretenders and fed a narrative for espn. Let the big ten win 3 or 4 in row and then you have a case
Excluding gatech, fsu and Clemson. The acc is a league of weak sisters.
Auburn is gonna commit crimes against nature when they play louiseville to open the season
All the old big East schools are the ones that really got exposed.
Oh and Penn state can rot in hell
Can't say I disagree with that last statement.
|
|
01-19-2015 07:25 PM |
|