(12-29-2014 07:59 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:53 PM)Maize Wrote:  The schools IMO:

UCF, USF, Cincinnati, ECU, Memphis, SMU, Houston, BYU, Colorado State, Boise State, San Diego State and UNLV...

I don't think Colorado state, San Diego state or unlv could ever succeed in a p5 conference. I don't think any of those team could have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference

Ok, I agree with you on unlv. They ll always be a MWC football bottom feeder. But Colorado st? You don't think Colorado st could "have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference"--??? Don't you remember Colorado St from the mid 90's til late 2000's under Sonny Lubbick? They were in the Liberty Bowl all the time vs the CUSA....they were ranked all the time. You don't consider that as "sustainable success"?

Speaking of which . . . . . Boise killing AZ 21 zip.

I think a better question regarding the OP--what P5 schools could make it in a G5 conference with G5 resources?

How would Ole Miss do in the Sun Belt?

(12-31-2014 04:42 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:59 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:53 PM)Maize Wrote:  The schools IMO:

UCF, USF, Cincinnati, ECU, Memphis, SMU, Houston, BYU, Colorado State, Boise State, San Diego State and UNLV...

I don't think Colorado state, San Diego state or unlv could ever succeed in a p5 conference. I don't think any of those team could have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference

Ok, I agree with you on unlv. They ll always be a MWC football bottom feeder. But Colorado st? You don't think Colorado st could "have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference"--??? Don't you remember Colorado St from the mid 90's til late 2000's under Sonny Lubbick? They were in the Liberty Bowl all the time vs the CUSA....they were ranked all the time. You don't consider that as "sustainable success"?

No, I was watching college football in the mid nineties as I was like 2 years old

(12-31-2014 05:17 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 04:42 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:59 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:53 PM)Maize Wrote:  The schools IMO:

UCF, USF, Cincinnati, ECU, Memphis, SMU, Houston, BYU, Colorado State, Boise State, San Diego State and UNLV...

I don't think Colorado state, San Diego state or unlv could ever succeed in a p5 conference. I don't think any of those team could have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference

Ok, I agree with you on unlv. They ll always be a MWC football bottom feeder. But Colorado st? You don't think Colorado st could "have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference"--??? Don't you remember Colorado St from the mid 90's til late 2000's under Sonny Lubbick? They were in the Liberty Bowl all the time vs the CUSA....they were ranked all the time. You don't consider that as "sustainable success"?

No, I was watching college football in the mid nineties as I was like 2 years old

LOL, what are you like 12. (j/k)

(12-31-2014 05:17 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 04:42 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:59 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:53 PM)Maize Wrote:  The schools IMO:

UCF, USF, Cincinnati, ECU, Memphis, SMU, Houston, BYU, Colorado State, Boise State, San Diego State and UNLV...

I don't think Colorado state, San Diego state or unlv could ever succeed in a p5 conference. I don't think any of those team could have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference

Ok, I agree with you on unlv. They ll always be a MWC football bottom feeder. But Colorado st? You don't think Colorado st could "have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference"--??? Don't you remember Colorado St from the mid 90's til late 2000's under Sonny Lubbick? They were in the Liberty Bowl all the time vs the CUSA....they were ranked all the time. You don't consider that as "sustainable success"?

No, I was watching college football in the mid nineties as I was like 2 years old

So because you weren't watching college football in the 90's and you don't know how good Colorado St was, don't you think you might be unqualified a bit to make statements about things you know nothing about? For 12 years they were darn good
CSU's period of "unsustainable success in a G5 conference"
1994-11-2-holiday bowl
1995-8-4-holiday bowl
1996-7-5
1997-12-2-holiday bowl
1998-8-4
1999-9-4-liberty bowl
2000-10-2-liberty bowl
2001-7-5-New Orleans bowl
2002-10-4-liberty bowl
2003-7-6-San Francisco bowl
2004-4-7
2005-6-6-San Francisco Bowl
06-12-1 winning season, 1 bowl
2013-8-6-New Mexico bowl
2014-10-3-las Vegas bowl

(12-31-2014 04:58 PM)cotton1991 Wrote:  Speaking of which . . . . . Boise killing AZ 21 zip.

I think a better question regarding the OP--what P5 schools could make it in a G5 conference with G5 resources?

How would Ole Miss do in the Sun Belt?

Spot on: Iowa st, Vanderbilt, Washington st, Kansas, Duke, Kentucky, Syracuse, Rutgers, BC, wake forest, Pitt, northwestern, Illinois, Purdue, Indiana and a few more come to mind instantly as teams that would be bottom feeders in football in a G5 conference with G5 recourses.

(12-29-2014 07:50 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  He just named the champion of each conference

No, he named "A" champion of each conference. His obvious ignorance is hard to bear. There are numerous teams in the AAC which can compete with most Privileged 5 members if given the equal advantages which come with membership in P5 conferences.

(12-31-2014 08:22 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 05:17 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 04:42 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:59 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:53 PM)Maize Wrote:  The schools IMO:

UCF, USF, Cincinnati, ECU, Memphis, SMU, Houston, BYU, Colorado State, Boise State, San Diego State and UNLV...

I don't think Colorado state, San Diego state or unlv could ever succeed in a p5 conference. I don't think any of those team could have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference

Ok, I agree with you on unlv. They ll always be a MWC football bottom feeder. But Colorado st? You don't think Colorado st could "have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference"--??? Don't you remember Colorado St from the mid 90's til late 2000's under Sonny Lubbick? They were in the Liberty Bowl all the time vs the CUSA....they were ranked all the time. You don't consider that as "sustainable success"?

No, I was watching college football in the mid nineties as I was like 2 years old

So because you weren't watching college football in the 90's and you don't know how good Colorado St was, don't you think you might be unqualified a bit to make statements about things you know nothing about? For 12 years they were darn good
CSU's period of "unsustainable success in a G5 conference"
1994-11-2-holiday bowl
1995-8-4-holiday bowl
1996-7-5
1997-12-2-holiday bowl
1998-8-4
1999-9-4-liberty bowl
2000-10-2-liberty bowl
2001-7-5-New Orleans bowl
2002-10-4-liberty bowl
2003-7-6-San Francisco bowl
2004-4-7
2005-6-6-San Francisco Bowl
06-12-1 winning season, 1 bowl
2013-8-6-New Mexico bowl
2014-10-3-las Vegas bowl

Didn't realize they were good a while back. My mistake. Chill out. It's nbd

(01-01-2015 01:25 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 08:22 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 05:17 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(12-31-2014 04:42 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(12-29-2014 07:59 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  I don't think Colorado state, San Diego state or unlv could ever succeed in a p5 conference. I don't think any of those team could have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference

Ok, I agree with you on unlv. They ll always be a MWC football bottom feeder. But Colorado st? You don't think Colorado st could "have any sort of sustainable success even in a G5 conference"--??? Don't you remember Colorado St from the mid 90's til late 2000's under Sonny Lubbick? They were in the Liberty Bowl all the time vs the CUSA....they were ranked all the time. You don't consider that as "sustainable success"?

No, I was watching college football in the mid nineties as I was like 2 years old

So because you weren't watching college football in the 90's and you don't know how good Colorado St was, don't you think you might be unqualified a bit to make statements about things you know nothing about? For 12 years they were darn good
CSU's period of "unsustainable success in a G5 conference"
1994-11-2-holiday bowl
1995-8-4-holiday bowl
1996-7-5
1997-12-2-holiday bowl
1998-8-4
1999-9-4-liberty bowl
2000-10-2-liberty bowl
2001-7-5-New Orleans bowl
2002-10-4-liberty bowl
2003-7-6-San Francisco bowl
2004-4-7
2005-6-6-San Francisco Bowl
06-12-1 winning season, 1 bowl
2013-8-6-New Mexico bowl
2014-10-3-las Vegas bowl

Didn't realize they were good a while back. My mistake. Chill out. It's nbd

I'm chill. Happy new year