Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
Author Message
CliftonAve Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 21,916
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1181
I Root For: Jimmy Nippert
Location:
Post: #1
Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
Best/Worst in terms of dollars spent vs. wins (football):

Best
1. Cincinnati
2. UCF
3. Kansas State
4. Oregon
5. Mississippi

Worst
1. Colorado
2. Cal
3. Kansas
4. Arkansas
5. Kentucky

http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=...ncaaf.html
12-22-2014 01:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Captain Bearcat Offline
All-American in Everything
*

Posts: 9,505
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 768
I Root For: UC
Location: IL & Cincinnati, USA
Post: #2
RE: Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
At least Kentucky is getting a good return for their buck on basketball. But they're spending so much that they still aren't exactly a bargain.
12-22-2014 02:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaredf29 Offline
Smiter of Trolls
*

Posts: 7,336
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 301
I Root For: UCF
Location: Nor Cal
Post: #3
RE: Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
Arkansas is probably going to come off that list pretty soon, pretty awesome that UC and UCF are the top two though.
12-22-2014 05:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


SuperFlyBCat Offline
Banned

Posts: 49,583
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #4
RE: Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
(12-22-2014 05:38 PM)jaredf29 Wrote:  Arkansas is probably going to come off that list pretty soon, pretty awesome that UC and UCF are the top two though.

04-cheers
12-22-2014 06:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
goofus Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,329
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 151
I Root For: Iowa
Location: chicago suburbs
Post: #5
RE: Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
This list can be a mixed blessing. Cincy has had great success hiring coaches in Dantonio, Kelly and Jones, but I guess they do not have the resources to keep a good coach around. Which is why they never have an overpaid coach.

it is also a sign that the Big East and AAC were nothing but stepping stone conferences. That was a good sign that the Big East was not a power conference when their coaches can be stolen away consistently.
Now I know somebody is going to make a joke about the Nebraska-Oregon State-Wisconsin-Pitt chain reaction that can happen between P5 schools, but that is more rare except for Pitt.

Cincy keeps losing its coach to a P5 school, and replaces him with a MAC coach, or Tommy Tupperville, one or the other.
12-23-2014 05:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


indycat Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,375
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 23
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
(12-23-2014 05:32 AM)goofus Wrote:  This list can be a mixed blessing. Cincy has had great success hiring coaches in Dantonio, Kelly and Jones, but I guess they do not have the resources to keep a good coach around. Which is why they never have an overpaid coach.

it is also a sign that the Big East and AAC were nothing but stepping stone conferences. That was a good sign that the Big East was not a power conference when their coaches can be stolen away consistently.
Now I know somebody is going to make a joke about the Nebraska-Oregon State-Wisconsin-Pitt chain reaction that can happen between P5 schools, but that is more rare except for Pitt.

Cincy keeps losing its coach to a P5 school, and replaces him with a MAC coach, or Tommy Tupperville, one or the other.

Last time I checked, Notre Dame (Kelly) Tennessee (Jones) and Michigan State (Dantonio) were considered destination coaching opportunities. Oh, but wait, Saban left Michigan State for the SEC (LSU). Bielema left the Badgers for the SEC (Arkansas). The B10 must be a stepping stone for the SEC?

Tuberville's compensation at Cincy is top 40; well above many P5 coaches. If he chooses to leave someday, so be it. Forbes is pointing out that Cincinnati football has earned the nation's best return on investment. Accept the facts; no negative spin required.

Imagine what Cincinnati will do with P5 resources?
12-23-2014 08:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
goofus Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,329
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 151
I Root For: Iowa
Location: chicago suburbs
Post: #7
RE: Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
Ok fair point.

And Lane Kiffen left Tenn for USC, Franklin left Vandy for PSU, and Urban Meyer eventually moved from Florida to Ohio State.

So the SEC and all conferences lose their share of coaches to other schools.

Of course locking in a good coach is no guaruntee of continued success.

Bobby Bowden became very mediocre in last seasons. Joe Paterno is now remembered as a fraud who let his assistants do all the coaching.

Kirk Ferentz and Iowa has been very average ever since he got one of those inflated contracts where he can not get fired. I am surprised Iowa was not on bottom 5 list.

The list goes on.
12-23-2014 09:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


indycat Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,375
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 23
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
(12-23-2014 09:10 AM)goofus Wrote:  Ok fair point.

And Lane Kiffen left Tenn for USC, Franklin left Vandy for PSU, and Urban Meyer eventually moved from Florida to Ohio State.

So the SEC and all conferences lose their share of coaches to other schools.

Of course locking in a good coach is no guaruntee of continued success.

Bobby Bowden became very mediocre in last seasons. Joe Paterno is now remembered as a fraud who let his assistants do all the coaching.

Kirk Ferentz and Iowa has been very average ever since he got one of those inflated contracts where he can not get fired. I am surprised Iowa was not on bottom 5 list.

The list goes on.

Yes, good analysis. To me, coaches should be able to move for better opportunities but the worst case scenario is walking before the bowl game. Generally speaking, I'm not one who wants more regulation in any realm but it's a real downer for the players and fans following a successful season. But I suppose there's no solution for that.
12-23-2014 09:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
herdfan2013 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,138
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 39
I Root For: Marshall
Location: Huntington
Post: #9
RE: Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
There aren't many destination gigs: Alabama, USC, ND, OSU, Michigan, Texas, maybe Oklahoma? These schools could pick off a coach from anywhere else.

Basketball end of the line gigs would be UNC, Duke, Kentucky. I don't think anyone else is safe from poaching by these three. (I want to say Kansas but Roy Williams doesn't think so).
12-23-2014 12:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcats#1 Offline
Ad nauseam King
*

Posts: 45,310
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 1224
I Root For: Pony94
Location: In your head.
Post: #10
RE: Forbes Best and Worst Teams for the Buck
(12-23-2014 05:32 AM)goofus Wrote:  This list can be a mixed blessing. Cincy has had great success hiring coaches in Dantonio, Kelly and Jones, but I guess they do not have the resources to keep a good coach around. Which is why they never have an overpaid coach.

it is also a sign that the Big East and AAC were nothing but stepping stone conferences. That was a good sign that the Big East was not a power conference when their coaches can be stolen away consistently.
Now I know somebody is going to make a joke about the Nebraska-Oregon State-Wisconsin-Pitt chain reaction that can happen between P5 schools, but that is more rare except for Pitt.

Cincy keeps losing its coach to a P5 school, and replaces him with a MAC coach, or Tommy Tupperville, one or the other.

true...but we keep winning. You guys pay your coach a lot and for what? Every heard of the term "time to cut bait"?

Your coach is 115-84 (.578) and gets 3.6 mil/yr......I'd say that's a pretty lousy return. You can brag that you are "keeping him" but really, who wants him? Not me.
12-23-2014 01:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.