(12-09-2014 07:40 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(12-09-2014 07:35 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-09-2014 07:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  So a perfect example doesn't count because it's "just one bill" Really? Seriously?
BTW, there is no legitimate rebuttal to support opposing that bill other than being anti anything that would ever make corporations more prone to lawsuits. The concept that the bill should be blocked due to frivolous lawsuits is laughable. That bill does a lot for equal pay because before that bill the stature of limitations were not long enough.

I don't think you have a clue what you are saying there.
I think you just proved ALL my points.
I rest my case.

Only losers yof an argument resort to that type of comment.

Ummm, no.

I am sorry but I don't buy your lying talking points.

(12-09-2014 08:45 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-09-2014 07:40 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(12-09-2014 07:35 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-09-2014 07:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  So a perfect example doesn't count because it's "just one bill" Really? Seriously?
BTW, there is no legitimate rebuttal to support opposing that bill other than being anti anything that would ever make corporations more prone to lawsuits. The concept that the bill should be blocked due to frivolous lawsuits is laughable. That bill does a lot for equal pay because before that bill the stature of limitations were not long enough.

I don't think you have a clue what you are saying there.
I think you just proved ALL my points.
I rest my case.

Only losers yof an argument resort to that type of comment.

Ummm, no.

I am sorry but I don't buy your lying talking points.

LOL. You are trying to defend talking point that is easily shown to be false.

Your last GOP POTUS nominee said "corporations are people too my friend"

Not to mention Citizens United ==> you know that pesky little thing that went 5-4 along party lines in the SCOTUS & when a constitutional amendment came up in the Senate to get rid of it, Every single Republican voted to kill the measure while nearly all of the Democrats were for it.

Welcome to the world of "Net Neutrality". it's stories like this which is why EVERYONE should be concerned when any mega-business (AT&T, Google, ComCast, etc.) screams "This is why Net Neutrality" is needed!

They only want it when it benefits the current ISP providers, not when startups and local govts step up to provide innovation and lower prices.

(12-09-2014 09:05 PM)john01992 Wrote:  LOL. You are trying to defend talking point that is easily shown to be false.

Only by equally false talking points... which is HIS point.

Quote:Your last GOP POTUS nominee said "corporations are people too my friend"

I don't recall the 'my friend', but according to the SCOTUS, that is 100% accurate in many instances. Political parties are 'people' as well, my friend... as are 'state bars' and LP's. The current DEM POTUS may not have said it, but he's certainly aware of it and instigated rules that address it both positively (for the ones he supports) and negatively (for the ones he doesn't)

Quote:Not to mention Citizens United ==> you know that pesky little thing that went 5-4 along party lines in the SCOTUS & when a constitutional amendment came up in the Senate to get rid of it, Every single Republican voted to kill the measure while nearly all of the Democrats were for it.

Yes, because as I said, MANY (but clearly not all) Democrats are against the people who sell you toilet paper that you need, but in favor of those who sell you bureaucratic paper.

(12-10-2014 12:47 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-09-2014 09:05 PM)john01992 Wrote:  LOL. You are trying to defend talking point that is easily shown to be false.

Only by equally false talking points... which is HIS point.

Quote:Your last GOP POTUS nominee said "corporations are people too my friend"

I don't recall the 'my friend', but according to the SCOTUS, that is 100% accurate in many instances. Political parties are 'people' as well, my friend... as are 'state bars' and LP's. The current DEM POTUS may not have said it, but he's certainly aware of it and instigated rules that address it both positively (for the ones he supports) and negatively (for the ones he doesn't)

Quote:Not to mention Citizens United ==> you know that pesky little thing that went 5-4 along party lines in the SCOTUS & when a constitutional amendment came up in the Senate to get rid of it, Every single Republican voted to kill the measure while nearly all of the Democrats were for it.

Yes, because as I said, MANY (but clearly not all) Democrats are against the people who sell you toilet paper that you need, but in favor of those who sell you bureaucratic paper.

Don't waste time with him, Hambone. He's the new Grad, living in a make believe world and launching ad hominem attacks on everyone who doesn't live in that world with him.