http://news.yahoo.com/video/chicago-cons...31571.html

This will harm the environment as more water will cause engine parts to corrode faster. It takes a lot of energy, and creates a lot of CO2, to build an engine.

This is absolute insanity. Or corruption.

(12-09-2014 03:11 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  http://news.yahoo.com/video/chicago-cons...31571.html

This will harm the environment as more water will cause engine parts to corrode faster. It takes a lot of energy, and creates a lot of CO2, to build an engine.

This is absolute insanity. Or corruption.

They should use it in Air Force One for the next two years. See if he's cool with that.

This gas destroys engines. There is no way to avoid it. Who will pay for the repairs?

It takes 1.5 gallons of gas to produce one gallon of ethanol. How many polar bears must die because of this?

And turning food into fuel drives up the price of food in poor countries, forcing millions into starvation.

The whole concept is foolish. Ugh!!!!!!!

(12-09-2014 05:41 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  This gas destroys engines. There is no way to avoid it. Who will pay for the repairs?

It takes 1.5 gallons of gas to produce one gallon of ethanol. How many polar bears must die because of this?

And turning food into fuel drives up the price of food in poor countries, forcing millions into starvation.

The whole concept is foolish. Ugh!!!!!!!

So now you care about poor people in other countries? Funny that you care more about the poor in other countries and say f-you to the poor in this country.

(12-09-2014 07:00 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-09-2014 05:41 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  This gas destroys engines. There is no way to avoid it. Who will pay for the repairs?

It takes 1.5 gallons of gas to produce one gallon of ethanol. How many polar bears must die because of this?

And turning food into fuel drives up the price of food in poor countries, forcing millions into starvation.

The whole concept is foolish. Ugh!!!!!!!

So now you care about poor people in other countries? Funny that you care more about the poor in other countries and say f-you to the poor in this country.

I love the poor here. I just don't think those that sit at home should be able to collect over $40K per year in government benefits while watching Oprah.

I was out of college eight years before I reached $40K back in 1992.

(12-09-2014 08:18 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(12-09-2014 07:00 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-09-2014 05:41 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  This gas destroys engines. There is no way to avoid it. Who will pay for the repairs?

It takes 1.5 gallons of gas to produce one gallon of ethanol. How many polar bears must die because of this?

And turning food into fuel drives up the price of food in poor countries, forcing millions into starvation.

The whole concept is foolish. Ugh!!!!!!!

So now you care about poor people in other countries? Funny that you care more about the poor in other countries and say f-you to the poor in this country.

I love the poor here. I just don't think those that sit at home should be able to collect over $40K per year in government benefits while watching Oprah.

I was out of college eight years before I reached $40K back in 1992.

Just to finish this before going to the other spin room, can you provide to prove the $40,000 #? If you can(doubt you can) can you provide the number of people "making" that $40,000. Thanks.

It's all over the news. That's like me having to prove the existence of air. If you add up all of the benefits allowed (food stamps, welfare, unemployment, Obamacare subsidies, etc.), it's over $40K.

Google the website halfwaytoconcord.com with $40,000. I'm on a little iPhone and can't link it. It actually puts the amount at $45K. That's not the only place.