Our RPI currently is 31 out of 334 teams. We lost to Pacific (49), USC (22), Oklahoma (20) and CSUN (45). So, none of those losses were embarrassing. On the flip side we had wins over Miami (28) and TCU (94), both from money conferences. My point is that I wonder how we might have done if we had had to hope for an at-large.

(12-01-2014 09:53 PM)MICHAELSPAPPY Wrote:  Our RPI currently is 31 out of 334 teams. We lost to Pacific (49), USC (22), Oklahoma (20) and CSUN (45). So, none of those losses were embarrassing. On the flip side we had wins over Miami (28) and TCU (94), both from money conferences. My point is that I wonder how we might have done if we had had to hope for an at-large.

Nice not to have to worry about that, isn't it?

(12-01-2014 09:53 PM)MICHAELSPAPPY Wrote:  Our RPI currently is 31 out of 334 teams. We lost to Pacific (49), USC (22), Oklahoma (20) and CSUN (45). So, none of those losses were embarrassing. On the flip side we had wins over Miami (28) and TCU (94), both from money conferences. My point is that I wonder how we might have done if we had had to hope for an at-large.

Very well I think.