Division strength will shift thru through the years. Navy wanted to be in West and UC in East

(12-01-2014 05:10 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(12-01-2014 05:06 PM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  Yeah I personally think the whole AAC is on the rise.

SMU with Chad Morris
Memphis
Navy
Tulane is on the rise.
Houston
Tulsa

The West could be very strong as well.

The AAC is gonna very strong from top to bottom here in the next season or 2.

Now if only we could dominate our OOC to prove it. Let the dice fall as they will in conference, but no one else should beat us but ourselves. ESPECIALLY FCS + G4

Yeah, we definitely have to take care of business. As I said, I think we should all be better. SMU is gonna take some time, but with Morris running the show, knowing what he can do even with SMU's current roster I think they could even win some games their not supposed too. I have huge respect for him.

You cheer on Louisville original thread poster. Why do you care about Navy and AAC?

That's the most important thing going forward. We need at least 3-4 teams going into conference 3-1 at worst

UC should have our own division and get more money than the rest of you.

(12-01-2014 05:44 PM)Savacool Wrote:  You cheer on Louisville original thread poster. Why do you care about Navy and AAC?

I thought he was being a good visitor.

(12-01-2014 05:46 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  UC should have our own division and get more money than the rest of you.

Boise St. approves this message.

(12-01-2014 05:56 PM)tnzazz Wrote:  

(12-01-2014 05:46 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  UC should have our own division and get more money than the rest of you.

Boise St. approves this message.

The Boise division?

(12-01-2014 05:44 PM)Savacool Wrote:  You cheer on Louisville original thread poster. Why do you care about Navy and AAC?

Are you an AIM Bot?

Any word on permanent cross divisional rivals? I'd love to have navy.

(12-01-2014 06:40 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Any word on permanent cross divisional rivals? I'd love to have navy.

Don't think there will be permanent ones

(12-01-2014 06:40 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Any word on permanent cross divisional rivals? I'd love to have navy.

I prefer to be like ECU not UNCheat

(12-01-2014 05:06 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Navy should be in the East, and Cincy in the West...but if thats what Navy wants, OK.

Navy wants it, and so does Aresco. He's trying to use Navy to lure Air Force and BYU into the west, and send Memphis east.

I heard that UC demanded that they never play Tulsa.

(12-01-2014 05:44 PM)Savacool Wrote:  You cheer on Louisville original thread poster. Why do you care about Navy and AAC?

prolly because last year was the only chance louiesville will have to win a football conference championship ever again and well we know how that ended

(12-01-2014 07:39 PM)panicstricken Wrote:  I heard that UC demanded that they never play Tulsa.

Never heard that and I doubt it.

I do agree with Cougar. Navy in the West with schools like Tulsa,SMU and Tulane fit and could also attract Air Gorce and BYU down the road

(12-01-2014 07:39 PM)panicstricken Wrote:  I heard that UC demanded that they never play Tulsa.

I thought everyone made that demand.

(12-01-2014 07:42 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(12-01-2014 07:39 PM)panicstricken Wrote:  I heard that UC demanded that they never play Tulsa.

I thought everyone made that demand.

Not USF

(12-01-2014 06:40 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Any word on permanent cross divisional rivals? I'd love to have navy.

UConn and SMU should be permanent rivals ... they have so much in common:

UConn: Northeastern, public, secular, rural, basketball tradition
SMU: Southwestern, private, religious, urban, football tradition

Actually, SMU is not really "religious"; the Methodist church has a "hands off" policy. One thing the schools do have in common is they're tied in the U.S News rankings.

As an ECU fan? Thank you for not putting Navy in the East.