Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
Author Message
Bull Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,349
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 380
I Root For: USF, UofH, AAC!
Location:
Post: #61
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
I'm not opmistic about USF. Needed two miracle comebacks to win 4 games against 4 very bad teams (no offense intended). I don't see any improvement from last season at all. No true quarterback, and very likely none next season as well. Couple that with a tough schedule... It wasn't Taggarts first season, and I didn't see any better play resulting from players buying into or learning his 'system' compared to last year...

Base on what, exactly, should anyone feel USF will perform better next season? And please don't tell me it's becuase we have a young team. So does UCF.
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2014 06:10 PM by Bull.)
12-01-2014 06:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,349
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 380
I Root For: USF, UofH, AAC!
Location:
Post: #62
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 11:18 AM)pesik Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 10:17 AM)mtmedlin Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 09:11 AM)USFRamenu Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 01:05 AM)pesik Wrote:  i think taggart gets fired next season, i dont see usf at all..i dont see a qb on usf taking them to the promised land and they arent improving

*^^^* This!!!

The QB of South Florida's future isn't on the roster yet. There has been no improvement in South Florida's game. They simply played a weaker schedule.

Even our new AD has seen it and went to have words with CWT at Half Time of the SMU game. Yes we won but there were no smiles. Every player and coach who walked to the busses could see Harlan's face. He never once smiled. 07-coffee3

White is improving and even though he isnt great, hell be ok next year. I liked whats happening with our defense and think they will be a strength next year.
We have some quality offensive linemen coming in and if we land a couple Jucos, then it will open up the run game.

I dont see Taggart going anywhere. He has 3 years left on his contract. we have to pay Holtz for the next three years and were paying Heath... we simply dont have the pockets deep enough to be paying three ex coaches . It would cost us over $1.5 million to do that.

Next year well get to a bowl. 2016 is the year we see taggarts system really work.

taggart WILL be fired if usf doesnt make a bowl next year...the difference between a successful football program and not is 30-40 mill, 1.5 is a price usf will pay...your new AD wont sit there and let what happened to the old AD happen to him

and 6-6? you have have FSU, maryland and syracuse, none of those 3 will be unbeatable (fsu losses jameis an oleary) but usf isnt remotely at the level to beat them, and before you bring up how close the maryland game was this year, you got 6 turnovers and still lost.
divsion play starts next year, uconn who could be much improved on diaco's year 2 will be the only team preseaseon team you'll be favored to bet in your division , and you might need some crazy luck to get smu, tulsa and tulane as your 3 cross division for me to see a chance at a bowl

usf has talent on the roster, i just dont believe in taggart system..i honestly don't think itll take much to turn it around.. if taggart was honestly like, eff it i give up, my offense doesn't work here, let me remove my offense hat, put on a CEO hat, goes a grabs some prolific spread offensive coach (maybe steal the Current WKU staff since he has ties there or whoever) and pulled a TCU, i not only think theyd make a bowl but would compete for a league championship (i think they are that talented)

but taggart still has 100% faith in his offense and system and will keep forcing on usf till he is fired

The 5 year extension to Hotlz absolutely WRECKED and KILLED our program. Bottom line. If Taggart was the guy, we might have recovered from that... but as of today, with two 2-win seasons (I don't count our miracle comebacks), in any normal world he'd be fired just like Hotlz. Two years is enough time to at least see SOME improvement. He only gets year 3 becuase of the Holtz situation.

Simply amazing what happened to what had been, until Leavitt got canned, a fairly successful program. Yeah no conference championships, but that's a pretty high standard for a young program new to a BCS conference. Winning seasons, bowls, rankings, and were drawing excellent crowds. We were in good shape until one simple blunder, the Holtz extension (which was based on NO performance), killed the program.
12-01-2014 06:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Cubanbull Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,617
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 392
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #63
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 06:14 PM)Bull Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 11:18 AM)pesik Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 10:17 AM)mtmedlin Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 09:11 AM)USFRamenu Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 01:05 AM)pesik Wrote:  i think taggart gets fired next season, i dont see usf at all..i dont see a qb on usf taking them to the promised land and they arent improving

*^^^* This!!!

The QB of South Florida's future isn't on the roster yet. There has been no improvement in South Florida's game. They simply played a weaker schedule.

Even our new AD has seen it and went to have words with CWT at Half Time of the SMU game. Yes we won but there were no smiles. Every player and coach who walked to the busses could see Harlan's face. He never once smiled. 07-coffee3

White is improving and even though he isnt great, hell be ok next year. I liked whats happening with our defense and think they will be a strength next year.
We have some quality offensive linemen coming in and if we land a couple Jucos, then it will open up the run game.

I dont see Taggart going anywhere. He has 3 years left on his contract. we have to pay Holtz for the next three years and were paying Heath... we simply dont have the pockets deep enough to be paying three ex coaches . It would cost us over $1.5 million to do that.

Next year well get to a bowl. 2016 is the year we see taggarts system really work.

taggart WILL be fired if usf doesnt make a bowl next year...the difference between a successful football program and not is 30-40 mill, 1.5 is a price usf will pay...your new AD wont sit there and let what happened to the old AD happen to him

and 6-6? you have have FSU, maryland and syracuse, none of those 3 will be unbeatable (fsu losses jameis an oleary) but usf isnt remotely at the level to beat them, and before you bring up how close the maryland game was this year, you got 6 turnovers and still lost.
divsion play starts next year, uconn who could be much improved on diaco's year 2 will be the only team preseaseon team you'll be favored to bet in your division , and you might need some crazy luck to get smu, tulsa and tulane as your 3 cross division for me to see a chance at a bowl

usf has talent on the roster, i just dont believe in taggart system..i honestly don't think itll take much to turn it around.. if taggart was honestly like, eff it i give up, my offense doesn't work here, let me remove my offense hat, put on a CEO hat, goes a grabs some prolific spread offensive coach (maybe steal the Current WKU staff since he has ties there or whoever) and pulled a TCU, i not only think theyd make a bowl but would compete for a league championship (i think they are that talented)

but taggart still has 100% faith in his offense and system and will keep forcing on usf till he is fired

The 5 year extension to Hotlz absolutely WRECKED and KILLED our program. Bottom line. If Taggart was the guy, we might have recovered from that... but as of today, with two 2-win seasons (I don't count our miracle comebacks), in any normal world he'd be fired just like Hotlz. Two years is enough time to at least see SOME improvement. He only gets year 3 becuase of the Holtz situation.

Simply amazing what happened to what had been, until Leavitt got canned, a fairly successful program. Yeah no conference championships, but that's a pretty high standard for a young program new to a BCS conference. Winning seasons, bowls, rankings, and were drawing excellent crowds. We were in good shape until one simple blunder, the Holtz extension (which was based on NO performance), killed the program.

That extension was a bonehead move.
12-01-2014 06:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ecumbh1999 Offline
Keeper of the Code
*

Posts: 11,888
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 255
I Root For: East Carolina
Location:
Post: #64
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(11-30-2014 11:54 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:15 AM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:12 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If this conference continues to be so piss poor on the back end and mediocre on the front end, anyone could turn it around.

Still better than the ACC

03-lmfao ACC 4 teams ranked AAC not so much.

You lost to State.03-lmfao take your 3-9 had to have OT to beat Villanova self and go.
12-01-2014 07:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DowdyPirate Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,078
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 234
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #65
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(11-30-2014 11:54 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:15 AM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:12 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If this conference continues to be so piss poor on the back end and mediocre on the front end, anyone could turn it around.

Still better than the ACC

03-lmfao ACC 4 teams ranked AAC not so much.

01-wingedeagle ECU beat two of the average ACC teams. "Average ACC teams" make up 90% of the ACC excluding FSU, WFU, and of course da Cuse
12-01-2014 07:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
indydoug Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 403
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 15
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #66
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(11-30-2014 10:15 AM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:12 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If this conference continues to be so piss poor on the back end and mediocre on the front end, anyone could turn it around.

Still better than the ACC

You mean better than that conference that went 4-0 vs. the mighty SEC this weekend?
12-01-2014 07:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
indydoug Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 403
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 15
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #67
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 10:52 AM)oldtiger Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 09:43 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 08:57 AM)pesik Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 01:33 AM)PlainTiger Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:14 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  You would have to wait until the conference schedules come out before knowing, because you would need to know who draws a Memphis like conference schedule.

Yeah, cause this year both ECU and UCF drew easy Memphis like schedules.

Combined league records of teams not played:
Memphis 11-3
ECU 12-3
UCF 13-2

im not here to debate but find it funny you are using the very point they are debating against you as your justification
them= unbalanced schedules gave some teams better conference record than maybe otherwise
you= conference records show we played similar schedules

Wrong. His point is that people talk trash about Memphis' conference schedule. He just proved that Memphis didn't get the easiest one.

UCF didn't have to play either top 3 team. Memphis and Cincy played each other. Both top 3. As far as who was considered better half way through the season is irrelevant. ECU no matter what can only finish as high as tied for third.

UCF is still tied for first but as pointed out they played 7 team in conference that Memphis played. The only difference is Memphis had to play @ Cincy, and UCF has to play @ ECU.

ECU didn't have to play Cincy or Houston.

Either way you look at it as of right now. Memphis did not have the easiest path based on current standings.

So the Memphis has a weak schedule would also apply to UCF and ECU in that argument.

I'd say the point was made pretty clear. He not saying Memphis played all 5 top teams, but to be fair only 1 team in our current top 6 did.

Below are the conference schedules of the 3 programs still in the hunt for the championship.

6 of 8 opponents on the 3 programs still in the race for the conference title are the same and are bolded. Two programs played the same opponents in 7 of 8 games, and all three had 6 common opponents.

The red games are where there are differences.

Houston...........Houston............Houston
Tulane.............Tulane..............Tulane
Temple............Temple.............Temple
Connecticut......Connecticut......Connecticut
SMU.................SMU..................SMU
South Florida....South Florida....South Florida

East Carolina......Cincinnati..........Memphis
Tulsa.................Tulsa................East Carolina


One team played no team that is in contention for the conference championship, while the other two played each other.

It was impossible for the conference office to know in advance which teams would be the toughest, but the schedules are more even than most here are acknowledging. Judge for yourself who had the easiest road to the championship. ECU is indeed tougher than Tulsa, so one program may have a point to make.

Looks like UC had the toughest of the other 3 with combined records of non- played teams 8-7.
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2014 08:04 PM by indydoug.)
12-01-2014 08:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
oldtiger Away
Forgiven Through Jesus' Grace
*

Posts: 23,014
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1181
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Germantown

DonatorsBlazerTalk AwardMemphis Hall of Fame
Post: #68
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 08:03 PM)indydoug Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 10:52 AM)oldtiger Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 09:43 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 08:57 AM)pesik Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 01:33 AM)PlainTiger Wrote:  Yeah, cause this year both ECU and UCF drew easy Memphis like schedules.

Combined league records of teams not played:
Memphis 11-3
ECU 12-3
UCF 13-2

im not here to debate but find it funny you are using the very point they are debating against you as your justification
them= unbalanced schedules gave some teams better conference record than maybe otherwise
you= conference records show we played similar schedules

Wrong. His point is that people talk trash about Memphis' conference schedule. He just proved that Memphis didn't get the easiest one.

UCF didn't have to play either top 3 team. Memphis and Cincy played each other. Both top 3. As far as who was considered better half way through the season is irrelevant. ECU no matter what can only finish as high as tied for third.

UCF is still tied for first but as pointed out they played 7 team in conference that Memphis played. The only difference is Memphis had to play @ Cincy, and UCF has to play @ ECU.

ECU didn't have to play Cincy or Houston.

Either way you look at it as of right now. Memphis did not have the easiest path based on current standings.

So the Memphis has a weak schedule would also apply to UCF and ECU in that argument.

I'd say the point was made pretty clear. He not saying Memphis played all 5 top teams, but to be fair only 1 team in our current top 6 did.

Below are the conference schedules of the 3 programs still in the hunt for the championship.

6 of 8 opponents on the 3 programs still in the race for the conference title are the same and are bolded. Two programs played the same opponents in 7 of 8 games, and all three had 6 common opponents.

The red games are where there are differences.

Houston...........Houston............Houston
Tulane.............Tulane..............Tulane
Temple............Temple.............Temple
Connecticut......Connecticut......Connecticut
SMU.................SMU..................SMU
South Florida....South Florida....South Florida

East Carolina......Cincinnati..........Memphis
Tulsa.................Tulsa................East Carolina


One team played no team that is in contention for the conference championship, while the other two played each other.

It was impossible for the conference office to know in advance which teams would be the toughest, but the schedules are more even than most here are acknowledging. Judge for yourself who had the easiest road to the championship. ECU is indeed tougher than Tulsa, so one program may have a point to make.

Looks like UC had the toughest of the other 3 with combined records of non- played teams 8-7.

Although the schedules are so close, it's hard to rank them. However, if fair minded people were forced to, I agree that the hardest would be the Bearcats by a pretty slim margin.

My point was that the schedules are so close, there is no real advantage for any one team, particularly the one that has been drug through the mud around scheduling.
12-01-2014 08:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mtmedlin Offline
I came, I saw, I wasn't impressed.
*

Posts: 4,824
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 183
I Root For: USF & Naps
Location: Tierra Verde
Post: #69
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
Quote:White is improving and even though he isnt great, hell be ok next year. I liked whats happening with our defense and think they will be a strength next year.
We have some quality offensive linemen coming in and if we land a couple Jucos, then it will open up the run game.

I dont see Taggart going anywhere. He has 3 years left on his contract. we have to pay Holtz for the next three years and were paying Heath... we simply dont have the pockets deep enough to be paying three ex coaches . It would cost us over $1.5 million to do that.

Next year well get to a bowl. 2016 is the year we see taggarts system really work.
Quote:taggart WILL be fired if usf doesnt make a bowl next year...the difference between a successful football program and not is 30-40 mill, 1.5 is a price usf will pay...your new AD wont sit there and let what happened to the old AD happen to him

and 6-6? you have have FSU, maryland and syracuse, none of those 3 will be unbeatable (fsu losses jameis an oleary) but usf isnt remotely at the level to beat them, and before you bring up how close the maryland game was this year, you got 6 turnovers and still lost.
divsion play starts next year, uconn who could be much improved on diaco's year 2 will be the only team preseaseon team you'll be favored to bet in your division , and you might need some crazy luck to get smu, tulsa and tulane as your 3 cross division for me to see a chance at a bowl

usf has talent on the roster, i just dont believe in taggart system..i honestly don't think itll take much to turn it around.. if taggart was honestly like, eff it i give up, my offense doesn't work here, let me remove my offense hat, put on a CEO hat, goes a grabs some prolific spread offensive coach (maybe steal the Current WKU staff since he has ties there or whoever) and pulled a TCU, i not only think theyd make a bowl but would compete for a league championship (i think they are that talented)

but taggart still has 100% faith in his offense and system and will keep forcing on usf till he is fired

Next year I think we get wins vs Florida A&M, Uconn, Tulsa and SMU. We were better then them last year and were only getting better next year.

Even though I have alot of respect for Syracuse, they are a mess right now. I think our chances are very good in that game. So that would be 5.

Our 3rd game from the west could be anybody... if its Tulane or Navy, I like our chances.

Now, the ONE thing that nobody likes to talk about when bashing USF is that we had the HARDEST AAC schedule. I dont think anybody else played All of the top 5 of our conference. Add in Wisconsin who is top 20 and two ACC schools that are 7-5 and you get a harder schedule then USF has had in a bit. If we had an easier AAC schedule, then I think were closer to a bowl game... but I really wouldnt have wanted it that way.

Next year our road schedule sucks, but our opponent selection is better. We have some very good Offensive linemen coming on, our defense improved each game and I believe we will be a better team. I think 6-6 is possible, which will get Taggart another year.

2016 we will see the payoff... and yall will have to trust me when I say that there is alot more to whats going on at USF when it comes to Taggart. Some pretty strong alumni were the ones that made Genshaft fire Skippy and they were the ones that helped land Taggart. Unless we have an utter meltdown and go backwards, Tag will be our coach in 2016.
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2014 09:14 PM by mtmedlin.)
12-01-2014 09:13 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DowdyPirate Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,078
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 234
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #70
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 07:55 PM)indydoug Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:15 AM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:12 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If this conference continues to be so piss poor on the back end and mediocre on the front end, anyone could turn it around.

Still better than the ACC

You mean better than that conference that went 4-0 vs. the mighty SEC this weekend?

Yup.
12-01-2014 10:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pirate1 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,294
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 86
I Root For: ThePiratesofECU
Location: Pahoa, Hawaii
Post: #71
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
UConn will be the turn around with Memphis staying around at the top with UCF.
12-01-2014 10:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Offline
The Black Knight of The Deplorables

Posts: 9,618
Joined: Oct 2013
I Root For: Army, SFU
Location: Michie Stadium 1945
Post: #72
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 10:28 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 07:55 PM)indydoug Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:15 AM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:12 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If this conference continues to be so piss poor on the back end and mediocre on the front end, anyone could turn it around.

Still better than the ACC

You mean better than that conference that went 4-0 vs. the mighty SEC this weekend?

Yup.

The ACC beat 3 Top Ten AP teams. I am usually big on the "bash ACC" bandwagon but they earned some respect this year.
12-01-2014 10:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DowdyPirate Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,078
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 234
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #73
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 10:35 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 10:28 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 07:55 PM)indydoug Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:15 AM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  
(11-30-2014 10:12 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  If this conference continues to be so piss poor on the back end and mediocre on the front end, anyone could turn it around.

Still better than the ACC

You mean better than that conference that went 4-0 vs. the mighty SEC this weekend?

Yup.

The ACC beat 3 Top Ten AP teams. I am usually big on the "bash ACC" bandwagon but they earned some respect this year.
They beat one? Georgia. Their only good win was GT @ UGA 30-24 in OT. Louisville should've won by more, so should've FSU.

Oh wait you mean the whole year? Pshhh. The SEC beat like 3 every week LOL 03-wink
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2014 10:39 PM by DowdyPirate.)
12-01-2014 10:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcats#1 Offline
Ad nauseam King
*

Posts: 45,310
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 1224
I Root For: Pony94
Location: In your head.
Post: #74
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
LOL how is anybody saying the AAC is better than the ACC with a straight face?!?!?!?

Folks, the AAC isn't even close top to bottom to the ACC and that just being honest. Come on.....really?!?!?
12-01-2014 10:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DowdyPirate Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,078
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 234
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #75
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 10:53 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  LOL how is anybody saying the AAC is better than the ACC with a straight face?!?!?!?

Folks, the AAC isn't even close top to bottom to the ACC and that just being honest. Come on.....really?!?!?

It was a joke that a Syracuse fan decided to take super literally so we are where we are now.
12-01-2014 11:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mtmedlin Offline
I came, I saw, I wasn't impressed.
*

Posts: 4,824
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 183
I Root For: USF & Naps
Location: Tierra Verde
Post: #76
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 10:53 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  LOL how is anybody saying the AAC is better than the ACC with a straight face?!?!?!?

Folks, the AAC isn't even close top to bottom to the ACC and that just being honest. Come on.....really?!?!?

I can say were better... in one category. Over the past 20 years our teams have significantly fewer NCAA violations.

(notice I am careful to not go too far back...smu, well ya know.)
12-01-2014 11:05 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcats#1 Offline
Ad nauseam King
*

Posts: 45,310
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 1224
I Root For: Pony94
Location: In your head.
Post: #77
RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 11:05 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 10:53 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  LOL how is anybody saying the AAC is better than the ACC with a straight face?!?!?!?

Folks, the AAC isn't even close top to bottom to the ACC and that just being honest. Come on.....really?!?!?

I can say were better... in one category. Over the past 20 years our teams have significantly fewer NCAA violations.

(notice I am careful to not go too far back...smu, well ya know.)

true
12-02-2014 09:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Insane_Baboon Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,669
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 52
I Root For: VT & UCF
Location:
Post: #78
Re: RE: Turnaround Candidates for Next Season - Your Input
(12-01-2014 10:53 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  LOL how is anybody saying the AAC is better than the ACC with a straight face?!?!?!?

Folks, the AAC isn't even close top to bottom to the ACC and that just being honest. Come on.....really?!?!?
Our top is about as good as their middle and our middle is about as good as their bottom. We are in no way close to as good as the ACC. I agree.
12-02-2014 09:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.