KnightLight Wrote:tigersharktwo Wrote:Do not expect any majority of BE football school presidents to vote to share their tv and BCS money with anyone but a current BCS member to have a split(ND,PSU,UMD).The likelihood of that is about zero.
Today's Did You Know:
Did you know just 3 plus years ago...many Big East Presidents felt that same very way...but they finally DID add 3 non-BCS Football Schools (plus 2 new Basketball Schools that were not a member of a "Big 6" Conference) and have now seen how the BCS "label" can improve those schools success on and off the court.
Since some already have changed their mind...and that "it" (adding non-BCS Schools) has already HAPPENED, I'd say its WELL above "zero".
I hate it when posters from other boards come on this one and actually make TigerSharkTwo sound intelligent - it only encourages him.
The difference between what happened in 2003 and what is being talked about now is that the Big East football schools HAD to add 3 schools back then in order to reach the mandatory 8 schools to be considered a Division 1-A conference. Now it's a choice.
Sort of like C-USA, back when they had 7 schools remaining in 2003 - they HAD to add at least 1 school, but then they had a choice to add an additional, one, two, or four.
They chose to add 4 more on top of the mandatory 1.
TS2 is of the rather firm belief that
given a choice now, the Big East football presidents won't add the equivalents of a Tulsa, a Rice, and/or an SMU simply to be a 9 or 10 team all-sports conference.
It remains to be seen if he is proven correct or not.
Cheers,
Neil