“The sense of entitlement these people displayed is reprehensible” said chair member, Dr. Amancio Dominguez, in an interview with National Report. “We deal with legitimate and widespread instances of human rights violations, and frankly the issues presented to us here are not even a blip on our radar. It is in our opinion after reviewing all the evidence that the officer in question committed absolutely no wrong doing.”

“We have much more important things to do than involve ourselves in county level legal proceedings. This was an absolute waste of our time. Compared to human rights violations that are prevalent in such 3rd world countries as North Korea and Brazil, America’s plight simply does not compare. While instances of police brutality certainly do exist, we have found that this was no such a case, and we will not be intervening in the matter.” - See more at: http://nationalreport.net/un-dismisses-m...dO2gM.dpuf

- See more at: http://nationalreport.net/un-dismisses-m...dO2gM.dpuf

(11-21-2014 02:01 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  “The sense of entitlement these people displayed is reprehensible” said chair member, Dr. Amancio Dominguez, in an interview with National Report. “We deal with legitimate and widespread instances of human rights violations, and frankly the issues presented to us here are not even a blip on our radar. It is in our opinion after reviewing all the evidence that the officer in question committed absolutely no wrong doing.”

“We have much more important things to do than involve ourselves in county level legal proceedings. This was an absolute waste of our time. Compared to human rights violations that are prevalent in such 3rd world countries as North Korea and Brazil, America’s plight simply does not compare. While instances of police brutality certainly do exist, we have found that this was no such a case, and we will not be intervening in the matter.” - See more at: http://nationalreport.net/un-dismisses-m...dO2gM.dpuf

- See more at: http://nationalreport.net/un-dismisses-m...dO2gM.dpuf

Now that's an answer!

That's because the UN doesn't give two shiits about political correctness, they're gonna tell it like it is... Good for them.

(11-21-2014 02:03 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  That's because the UN doesn't give two shiits about political correctness, they're gonna tell it like it is... Good for them.

What UN are you looking at?

(11-21-2014 02:46 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(11-21-2014 02:03 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  That's because the UN doesn't give two shiits about political correctness, they're gonna tell it like it is... Good for them.

What UN are you looking at?

LOL, my thoughts exactly

(11-21-2014 02:46 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(11-21-2014 02:03 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  That's because the UN doesn't give two shiits about political correctness, they're gonna tell it like it is... Good for them.

What UN are you looking at?

I was thinking "foreign."

(11-21-2014 02:48 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(11-21-2014 02:46 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(11-21-2014 02:03 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  That's because the UN doesn't give two shiits about political correctness, they're gonna tell it like it is... Good for them.

What UN are you looking at?

LOL, my thoughts exactly

Yeah yeah yeah... Here, slap the back of my head and lets move on.

Fake article http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/mikebrownun.asp

(11-21-2014 02:51 PM)BeliefBlazer Wrote:  Fake article http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/mikebrownun.asp

Too bad. I think we'd all like to see the UN give proper answers like that.

(11-21-2014 02:53 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-21-2014 02:51 PM)BeliefBlazer Wrote:  Fake article http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/mikebrownun.asp

Too bad. I think we'd all like to see the UN give proper answers like that.

I saw that too, didn't know whether to believe it or not.

First I was like



Then I was like

Please people, it's the UN, it was created to interfere in pointless **** and ignore the real problems.

(11-21-2014 03:28 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  First I was like



Then I was like

LMFAO! Perfect!

The fact of the matter is that the UN shouldn't be concerned about isolated incidents like this. They should be concerned about human rights abuses in places like Mexico, North Korea, etc... not about someone getting killed by a police officer.

In this case, this is something that American's themselves should be addressing. Whether or not Mike Brown was a threat or not, I don't know. I do know that there are examples of officers playing nice and getting killed over it, and there are examples of officers being overzealous and killing innocent people. The data gathered in these situations should be transparent and easy to follow. If the officer broke protocol, it should be known. Just because he broke protocol doesn't mean he did anything wrong, but at least be transparent instead of making things look like a coverup.

Should have known from the beginning that that made too much sense to have come from the UN.

I knew the national report sounded familiar...

(11-21-2014 03:53 PM)mlb Wrote:  The fact of the matter is that the UN shouldn't be concerned about isolated incidents like this. They should be concerned about human rights abuses in places like Mexico, North Korea, etc... not about someone getting killed by a police officer.

In this case, this is something that American's themselves should be addressing. Whether or not Mike Brown was a threat or not, I don't know. I do know that there are examples of officers playing nice and getting killed over it, and there are examples of officers being overzealous and killing innocent people. The data gathered in these situations should be transparent and easy to follow. If the officer broke protocol, it should be known. Just because he broke protocol doesn't mean he did anything wrong, but at least be transparent instead of making things look like a coverup.

Very true. Like the kidnapping and murder of 43 Mexican children, then burned and buried.
And girls sold into the sex slave industry.