Last November, Los Angeles Unified School District lawyers fighting a civil lawsuit argued in court that a 14-year-old middle school student was mature enough to consent to having sex with her 28-year-old teacher, and that she bore some responsibility for what happened. The district's attorneys also introduced the girl's sexual history into the trial as part of their defense strategy.

Two legal experts sharply criticized the school district for using those tactics. They also said the case highlights a little-known conflict in California law: while the age of consent is firmly set at 18 in criminal cases, at least two appellate court rulings have found that in civil cases, it is possible to argue that a minor can consent to sex with an adult.

Last November's case involved a math teacher at Thomas Edison Middle School in Southeast Los Angeles who in December 2010 began a six-month sexual relationship with a girl who went to the school. The teacher, Elkis Hermida, was convicted of lewd acts against a child and sentenced in July 2011 to three years in state prison.

http://www.scpr.org/news/2014/11/13/4803...to-sex-wi/



Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Lesbian “rights” are trump in this card game.




Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

OK, great. She consented to the teacher committing a crime. But the teacher still committed the crime. Maybe she'll consent to him robbing a bank.

(11-13-2014 08:04 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Lesbian “rights” are trump in this card game.

Christian right is getting played in cases like this. This is a false dichotomy, and it is NOT either/or. Christian right should stay away from either side in this case.

(11-14-2014 08:33 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-13-2014 08:04 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Lesbian “rights” are trump in this card game.

Christian right is getting played in cases like this. This is a false dichotomy, and it is NOT either/or. Christian right should stay away from either side in this case.

Conservatives need to be vigilant in defending parental rights to consent and prosecute crimes against children. Religion has nothing to do with it. It is a parental right. Parents are responsible for their children. Children cannot sign contracts. Children cannot consent. An adult does not have the right to talk a child into willingly experimenting with them sexually. Steve is not a Christian and I am sure would agree.

(11-14-2014 08:39 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 08:33 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-13-2014 08:04 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Lesbian “rights” are trump in this card game.

Christian right is getting played in cases like this. This is a false dichotomy, and it is NOT either/or. Christian right should stay away from either side in this case.

Conservatives need to be vigilant in defending parental rights to consent and prosecute crimes against children. Religion has nothing to do with it. It is a parental right. Parents are responsible for their children. Children cannot sign contracts. Children cannot consent. An adult does not have the right to talk a child into willingly experimenting with them sexually. Steve is not a Christian and I am sure would agree.

You're getting played in cases like this. There are bigger strategies involved.

(11-14-2014 08:55 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 08:39 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 08:33 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-13-2014 08:04 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Lesbian “rights” are trump in this card game.

Christian right is getting played in cases like this. This is a false dichotomy, and it is NOT either/or. Christian right should stay away from either side in this case.

Conservatives need to be vigilant in defending parental rights to consent and prosecute crimes against children. Religion has nothing to do with it. It is a parental right. Parents are responsible for their children. Children cannot sign contracts. Children cannot consent. An adult does not have the right to talk a child into willingly experimenting with them sexually. Steve is not a Christian and I am sure would agree.

You're getting played in cases like this. There are bigger strategies involved.

Explain

(11-14-2014 08:58 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 08:55 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 08:39 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 08:33 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-13-2014 08:04 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Lesbian “rights” are trump in this card game.

Christian right is getting played in cases like this. This is a false dichotomy, and it is NOT either/or. Christian right should stay away from either side in this case.

Conservatives need to be vigilant in defending parental rights to consent and prosecute crimes against children. Religion has nothing to do with it. It is a parental right. Parents are responsible for their children. Children cannot sign contracts. Children cannot consent. An adult does not have the right to talk a child into willingly experimenting with them sexually. Steve is not a Christian and I am sure would agree.

You're getting played in cases like this. There are bigger strategies involved.

Explain

Here's an example

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-09...sband.html

The traditional marriage vow is consent until death. It has been overtly challenged as part of the feminist agenda for many years. Every loophole, every item for debate about what constitutes consent will be used as an assault on marriage, primarily on men.